Acute Care Setting Research Articles

Cross‐sectional evaluation of a clinical decision support tool to identify medication‐related problems at discharge from the acute care setting

AbstractBackgroundThere are many reported pharmacist‐led transitions of care (TOC) programs to address medication‐related problems (MRP) at discharge from the acute care setting. Most have identified time and labor resources as significant limitations. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a medication risk score (MRS)‐driven clinical decision support system (CDSS) in identifying actionable MRPs and improving medication safety in the acute care discharge TOC setting.MethodsA cross‐sectional analysis was conducted in a cohort of 481 subjects discharged from the acute care setting. The MRS‐CDSS was utilized to identify MRPs and provide recommendations for risk reduction. The distribution of MRPs, recommendations, and their associations with MRS severity were analyzed. Additionally, the potential reduction in MRS per subject and its correlation with MRS severity were examined.ResultsThe median MRS reduction per subject was 2 points, while high/severe‐risk patients showed a median potential reduction of 7 points. Among the identified MRPs (n = 691), drug interaction, drug use without indication, and adverse drug reaction accounted for 89.7% of all MRPs. The top three recommendations, discontinue medication, change the time of administration, and start alternative therapy, represented 94.1% of all recommendations. Stratified analysis by MRS category revealed a significant increase in adverse drug reaction MRPs and recommendations to discontinue medications with higher MRS severity. The results were consistent with previous outpatient studies, supporting the MRS‐CDSS's ability to enhance medication safety.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that the MRS‐CDSS effectively identifies actionable MRPs and has the potential to substantially reduce overall pharmacotherapy regimen risk when applied during acute care discharge TOC. The findings support implementable recommendations directed at patient safety and the allocation of health care resources to high‐risk patients for maximum benefit.

Screening for Risk of Fall-Related Inpatient Trauma in a US Acute Care Setting.

Introduction Falls during hospitalization are a leading cause of preventable trauma-related injuries. Factors associated with fall risk include an unfamiliar environment, changes in health status, and efficacy based on the home environment. Assessing fall efficacy with an individualized prevention plan can decrease falls. The primary aim of this study was to estimate the effect of implementing a fall efficacy screening and intervention on reducing patient falls. Methods The study utilized a quasi-experimental, cross-sectional design with a convenience sample of patients admitted to an in-patient adult medical unit within a community hospital over a twelve-month period. Sampling times included pre-implementation, immediately post-implementation, and a second post-implementation phase. The intervention consisted of an admission fall efficacy screening tool and an individualized educational initiative. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics of central tendency and dispersion, along with inferential statistics using independent sample t-tests, chi-square tests, correlations, and binary logistic regression. Results Among the study participants (n=2,074), the total sample had an average age of 67.7 (+/- 17.4) years and had mean scores of 13.3 (6.9) on the Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International and 51.8 (20.3) on the Morse Fall Scale. Fifty-two percent of the study population were female; 16.2% of the patients were diagnosed with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or CVA-like symptoms. Fall rates decreased with a rate of change of -4.15% after efficacy screening and intervention. Males demonstrated higher efficacy in avoiding falls compared to females (t(828) = 3.369, p <0.001). Patients with a CVA diagnosis demonstrated higher efficacy scores compared to non-CVA patients (t(2071) = -3.348, p <0.001). FES risk groups (ORof 5.632, 95% CI (2.171-7.892)) and age over 65 (OR 1.21, 95% CI (1.006-1.442)) were significant predictors of a fall when patients with a primary CVA diagnosis were omitted from the sample (p= 0.022 and 0.046 respectively). Conclusion The findings suggest that efficacy screening may be associated with decreased falls for acute care non-CVA inpatient populations over 65 years of age. Further research into the predictive utility of fall efficacy screening in acute care CVA and non-CVA hospitalized patient populations aged 65 years and above is recommended.

"We Wanna Be Nurses Because We Want the Human Connection": Acceptability and Usability of a Person-Centered Narrative Intervention in an Acute Care Setting.

The use of narrative interventions in health care is an effective way to communicate connection between patients and clinicians. The electronic health record (EHR) is a primary mode of communicating patient information across clinical teams. Thus, incorporating a person-centered cocreated narrative with patients into the EHR is an opportunity to share a person's cultural values, beliefs, and preferences; provide connection; and foster positive patient-clinician interactions. This study of a person-centered narrative intervention was a randomized controlled trial to test intervention effects on the person's (patient) perceptions of the quality of communication with their nurses and their psychosocial and existential well-being. This article describes the clinical team's experiences and reach of the cocreated person-centered narrative integration into the patient's EHR. The data collected included (1) exit interviews (n = 14), (2) a usability survey (n = 8), and (3) data collected from the EHR for clinicians (n = 600) who accessed the uploaded narratives. Overall, the System Usability Scale and nurse participant's experiences provided confirmation that the person-centered narrative intervention was usable. There were also interprofessional groups of clinicians in the health care system who accessed the narratives. Future research should continue to identify core components and implementation strategies of EHR-integrated person-centered narratives in complex health care settings.

Identifying intraoperative events in a simulated laparotomy video: a multinational study of inattentional blindness among anesthesiologists.

Medical errors may be occasionally explained by inattentional blindness (IB), i.e., failing to notice an event/object that is in plain sight. We aimed to determine whether age/experience, restfulness/fatigue, and previous exposure to simulation education may affect IB in the anesthetic/surgical setting. In this multicentre/multinational study, a convenience sample of 280 anesthesiologists watched an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient undergoing laparotomy and (independently/anonymously) recorded the abnormalities they noticed. The video contained four expected/common abnormalities (hypotension, tachycardia, hypoxia, hypothermia) and two prominently displayed unexpected/rare events (patient's head movement, leaky central venous line). We analyzed the participants' ability to notice the expected/unexpected events (primary outcome) and the proportion of expected/unexpected events according to age group and prior exposure to simulation education (secondary outcomes). Anesthesiologists across all ages noticed fewer unexpected/rare events than expected/common ones. Overall, younger anesthesiologists missed fewer common events than older participants did (P = 0.02). There was no consistent association between age and perception of unexpected/rare events (P = 0.28), although the youngest cohort (< 30yr) outperformed the other age groups. Prior simulation education did not affect the proportion of misses for the unexpected/rare events but was associated with fewer misses for the expected/common events. Self-perceived restfulness did not impact perception of events. Anesthesiologists noticed fewer unexpected/rare clinical events than expected/common ones in an attention-demanding video of a simulated trauma patient, in keeping with IB. Prior simulation training was associated with an improved ability to notice anticipated/expected events, but did not reduce IB. Our findings may have implications for understanding medical mishaps, and efforts to improve situational awareness, especially in acute perioperative and critical care settings.

Uses of infrared thermography in acute illness: a systematic review.

Infrared thermography (IRT) is a non-contact, non-ionising imaging modality, providing a visual representation of temperature distribution across a surface. We conducted a systematic search of indexed and grey literature for studies investigating IRT applications involving patients in acute care settings. Studies were categorised and described along themes identified iteratively using narrative synthesis. Quality appraisal of included studies was performed using the Quality Assessment tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Of 1,060 unique records, 30 studies were included. These were conducted in emergency departments and intensive care units involving adult, paediatric and neonatal patients. IRT was studied for the diagnosis, monitoring or risk stratification of a wide range of individual conditions. IRT was predominantly used to display thermal change associated with localised inflammation or microcirculatory dysfunction. Existing research is largely at an early developmental stage. We recommend that high quality diagnostic validation studies are now required for some clinical applications. IRT has the potential to be a valuable tool in the acute care setting and represents an important area for future research particularly when combined with advances in machine learning technology. CRD 42022327619 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=327619).

Oral ethanol prescribing for alcohol withdrawal syndrome: initial findings and future directions following implementation within a United Kingdom National Health Service setting

Introduction Prescribing of ethanol may be an alternative to benzodiazepines for managing alcohol withdrawal syndrome. We present our experience of oral ethanol prescribing within an acute United Kingdom National Health Service setting. Methods A retrospective review of patients presenting with alcohol withdrawal who were managed with oral ethanol or benzodiazepines was performed from data collected across two acute care settings. Ethanol prescribing inclusion: high risk of delirium tremens, or a history of harmful alcohol consumption (typically ≥30 units/day; in which 1 unit = 8 grams of alcohol; one standard United States drink = 14 grams of alcohol) or known to have a history of severe alcohol withdrawal, alcohol-related seizures or delirium tremens. Inverse propensity score weighting was used to partially account for variance between the two patient populations. Results Fifty (82 per cent male; average age 50.9 years) and 93 (84 per cent male; average age 46.5 years) patients in receipt of benzodiazepines or ethanol, respectively, were included. The likelihood of hospital admission was significantly reduced when individuals were managed with ethanol (odds ratio 0.206 (95 per cent confidence interval; 0.066-0.641), Wald chi-square P = 0.006). In those not admitted, the treatment type had no significant impact on length of stay or the number of occasions a pharmacological agent was required. In those admitted, treatment had no significant effect on length of stay. Discussion We offer preliminary evidence to support a role of oral ethanol in the management of patients with alcohol withdrawal. We have implemented a robust and translatable guideline. Despite limitations in the data set the impact of ethanol in reducing the likelihood of admission remained significant. Conclusions In individuals at significant risk of severe alcohol withdrawal, prescribing ethanol as part of a comprehensive care plan, may reduce unplanned admissions. The preliminary findings presented here warrant further assessment through prospective studies.

Adopting the “TDODAR” Model to Improve Clinical Decision-Making in Acute and Critical Care Settings

Adopting the “TDODAR” Model to Improve Clinical Decision-Making in Acute and Critical Care Settings

Consistency of Physical Therapist Discharge Recommendations in Acute Care

Introduction: Physical therapists assist with discharge planning for hospitalized patients by making recommendations regarding a patient’s optimal discharge location and ongoing rehabilitation needs. The purpose of this study was to examine the consistency of discharge recommendations made by physical therapists with experience working in an acute care setting, when provided with a set of clinical vignettes describing hospitalized patients. Review of Literature: Considering the complex/multifactorial nature of making discharge recommendations, one would expect there to be inconsistencies among physical therapists. However, we are not aware of a previous study examining the level of consistency for discharge recommendations made by physical therapists, when reviewing a set of clinical vignettes. Subjects: Nineteen physical therapists working in an acute care setting. Methods: The physical therapists were provided with 10 clinical vignettes describing hospitalized patients via an electronic survey distributed across three rehabilitation departments. Each vignette described the patient’s medical condition, past medical history, prior level of function, living situation, key examination findings, and other general characteristics. After independently reviewing each case, the physical therapists selected a discharge recommendation from a list of standard options. Fleiss’ kappa was examined to assess the level of agreement among the physical therapists. Results: Overall, Fleiss’ kappa was 0.28, which reflects fair agreement among the physical therapists. Discussion and Conclusion: The 19 physical therapists who participated in this study only exhibited fair agreement with respect to their discharge recommendations. This relatively low level of agreement suggests that efforts to improve the consistency of discharge recommendations should be explored.

Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on oral health care in acute stroke patients: a qualitative study

BackgroundStroke is a major public health problem, with the disabilities of the patients increasing their risk of poor oral health. Currently, in Ghana and Nigeria, no guideline exists for oral health care in stroke patients, while most of our acute stroke care settings have no documented protocol.AimThis study sought to understand the perspectives of healthcare professionals in Ghana and Nigeria about oral healthcare in acute stroke patients.MethodsA qualitative inductive approach was employed to explore healthcare professionals’ perspectives. After obtaining informed consent, in-depth interviews were conducted among doctors, nurses, and physiotherapists using semi-structured question guides. Participants’ responses were audiotaped for transcription and analysis. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached. Data were analyzed thematically to generate themes and sub-themes using an inductive approach.The resultsTwenty-five (25) health care professionals (HCP) aged 25–60 years with a mean age of 36.2 ± 4.2 years were interviewed. There were 15 (60.0%) males and 10 (40.0%) females. HCP included nurse practitioners 14 (56.0%), medical doctors 7 (28.0%), and physiotherapists 4 (16.0%). The HCP demonstrated adequate knowledge of stroke and considered oral health important for esthetic and clinical reasons. They, however, reported being unable to give it the required attention due to inadequate collaboration between the various professional cadres, insufficient equipment, and a skewed focus on other clinical needs of the acute stroke patients.ConclusionsThe findings indicate that HCPs perceived oral health care as very important among patients with acute stroke. However, they reported a lack of collaboration and integration of oral health care in routine stroke care as a major impediment.

Determining QTc in acute care settings: What we (don't) know.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

The Impact of an Online Preceptorship Training Program on Preceptor Self-Efficacy Among Nurse Case Managers Working in an Acute Care Setting.

The U.S. health care system is experiencing a critical workforce shortage of nurse case managers exacerbated by an older workforce and looming retirements and the growth of this specialty. This quality improvement project aimed to develop an online case manager preceptor training program and examine its impact on the nurse case manager preceptors' self-efficacy. This project was implemented at a 395-bed acute care, community-based hospital in the northeast. The target population for the intervention included a convenience sample of 13 nurse case managers who were assigned a preceptor role. The intervention was an abbreviated version of an online preceptorship program by Lippincott. The Preceptor Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.96, measured nurse preceptors' confidence in various skills including fostering critical thinking and providing feedback. Data from pre- and post-intervention PSEQ surveys were analyzed using a Wilcoxon rank sum test in SPSS version 28. The Wilcoxon rank sum test revealed a statistically significant improvement in preceptor confidence scores ( p =.043) between pre- and post-intervention PSEQ results. This project demonstrated feasibility of an online nurse case manager preceptor training program while also identifying improved preceptors' self-efficacy. Future research can include investigating the impact of a preceptor training program on the nurse case manager learners receiving role training from the trained case manager preceptor.

Correction to “Pharmacist‐led intervention to reduce inappropriate continuation of targeted medications initiated in the acute care setting at hospital and ICU discharge”

Correction to “Pharmacist‐led intervention to reduce inappropriate continuation of targeted medications initiated in the acute care setting at hospital and <scp>ICU</scp> discharge”

Palliative Care of Stroke Patients

Critical care clinicians frequently care for patients with acute brain injury, such as stroke. Regardless of the severity of the neurologic insult, these patients have life-altering deficits that threaten their personal identity and quality of life. The sudden nature of the injury often means that there has been little discussion between patients and their families about life-sustaining treatments, and most patients are unable to speak for themselves because of impaired cognition and communication. Thus, individuals experiencing stroke and their families present clinicians with unique and complex care needs in the acute care setting. Key professional organizations have endorsed the early integration of palliative care into the treatment of patients with stroke and devastating neurologic injury. Implementing interdisciplinary primary or specialty palliative care helps clinicians adopt a patient-centered approach to care and aids in decision-making.

Use and Intensification of Oral Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

Adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction are at increased risk for morbidity and mortality, especially if hospitalized for acute decompensation. Evidence-based medication therapies are frequently underused or inappropriately prescribed, which further exacerbates poor outcomes for these patients. Provider inertia has been identified as a leading cause of poor medication utilization. Nurse practitioners in an acute care setting are uniquely positioned to improve outcomes by prescribing and intensifying oral therapies during acute decompensated heart failure. This article describes the current evidence-related core guideline-directed medical therapy along with strategies for intensification during hospitalization.

Parenteral nutrition in the hospital setting/short-term parenteral nutrition.

This article is based on presentations and discussions held at the International Safety and Quality of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Summit concerning the acute care setting. Some European practices presented in this article do not conform with USP general chapter <797> requirements. Nevertheless, the purpose is to cover the challenges experienced in delivering high-quality PN within hospitals in the United States and Europe, in order to share best practices and experiences more widely. Core issues regarding the PN process within an acute care setting are largely the same everywhere: There are ongoing pressures for greater efficiency, optimization, and also concurrent commitments to make PN safer for patients. Within Europe, in recent years, the use of market-authorized multi-chamber bags (MCBs) has increased greatly, mainly for safety, cost-effectiveness, and efficiency purposes. However, in the US, hospitals with low PN volumes may face particular challenges, as automated compounding equipment is often unaffordable in this setting and the variety of available MCBs is limited. This can result in the need to operate several PN systems in parallel, adding to the complexity of the PN use process. Ongoing PN quality and safety initiatives from US institutions with various PN volumes are presented. In the future, the availability of a greater selection of MCBs in the US may increase, leading to a reduction in dependence on compounded PN, as has been seen in many European countries. The examples presented may encourage improvements in the safety and quality of PN within the acute care setting worldwide.

The Stress Index as a Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Isolated Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

The Stress Index (SI), calculated as the ratio of blood glucose to serum potassium levels, is a promising prognostic marker in various acute care settings. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of the SI for predicting mortality in patients with isolated moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). This retrospective cohort study included adult trauma patients (aged ≥ 20 years) with isolated moderate to severe TBI (Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥ 3 for only head region) treated from 2009-2022. The SI was computed from the initial glucose and potassium levels upon arrival at the emergency department. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between the SI and mortality after adjusting for relevant covariates. The most effective threshold value of the SI for predicting mortality was identified using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Among the 4357 patients with isolated moderate and severe TBI, 463 (10.6%) died. Deceased patients had a significantly higher SI (61.7 vs. 44.1, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, higher SI independently predicted greater mortality risk (odds ratio (OR) 6.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.66-26.99, p = 0.007). The optimal SI cutoff for predicting mortality was 48.50 (sensitivity 62.0%, specificity 71.4%, area under the curve 0.724). Patients with SI ≥ 48.5 had nearly two-fold higher adjusted mortality odds compared to those below the threshold (adjusted OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.51-2.50, p < 0.001). SI is a useful predictor of mortality in patients with isolated moderate-to-severe TBI. Incorporating SI with standard clinical assessments could enhance risk stratification and management approaches for this patient population.

An integrative review of the impact of allied health student placements on current staff’s knowledge and procedural skills in acute and primary care settings

BackgroundStaff shortages limit access to health services. The bidirectional benefits of allied health clinical placements are understood in the domains of student learning, health service delivery, and future workforce development. Still, the benefits to current workforce outcomes remain unknown. This review provides insights into the effects of allied health student placements in acute and primary care settings, particularly on healthcare staff's knowledge and procedural skills.MethodsThis search was based on the integrative review process established by Whittemore and Knafl in 2005. In October 2023, the first author (MH) searched five major electronic databases: Medline-EBSCO, PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus. The CLUSTER model was used to track additional references. The first three authors (MH, SM, and SC) were involved in screening, quality appraisal, and synthesis of the studies. Data were thematically synthesised and analysed.ResultsMeSH headings and keywords were used in key search areas: health education, health professional training, clinical placements, and allied health professions. The systematic search yielded 12 papers on allied health student placements across various healthcare settings in rural and metropolitan areas, with no high-quality methodologies measuring student placements' impact on staff knowledge and skills. Four main themes were identified from the analysis: meaningful student integration in service delivery, targeted educational support to healthcare staff, development of staff procedural skills and confidence, and the mechanisms of why student placements work in this aspect.ConclusionsThis review suggests that offering allied health student placement could be a promising approach to supporting rural healthcare staff in performing patient assessments and treatments proficiently and collaboratively. However, this requires further investigation to confirm.

Patient safety — Are we speaking the same language?

BackgroundSince the radical years following the To Err is Human report, patient safety research has become settled on standardisation and audit cultures. Recent work suggests a change in direction. Current efforts exploring the intricate relationship between stability and change within organisations establish a more balanced patient safety perspective. Frontline staff insights are key to this new knowledge. AimThis study aims to explore the patient safety perceptions of registered nurses working directly with patients in acute care settings. MethodFacilitated reflexive workshops were conducted with nine wards from October to November 2022. Data analysis explored creative works and reflective notes of group discussions with frontline registered nurses using a critical lens. FindingsWe offer four analytical interpretations of how frontline registered nurses understand and experience patient safety. These are as follows: buzzwords, keep ME safe, listen to US, and this is MY role. These manifest the business of patient safety where nurses are, under siege, the silenced team member and experience tension between accountability and responsibility. DiscussionCritical questioning and reappraisal of patient safety practices require the vast knowledge of frontline staff to be fully utilised. ConclusionThis research reveals much of what is avoided in patient safety literature — the tension between what registered nurses understand, experience, and can deliver in patient safety practice. It challenges organisational leaders to enable and support frontline nurses in driving local change.

Influence of multidisciplinary team care with abundant nurse staffing on patient-reported outcomes among patients with inflammatory bowel disease in clinical remission

BackgroundPatients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience difficulties in daily life and demanding self-care needs. The goal of our support for patients is to ease their difficulties and improve their belief in their capacity to self-manage their disease (self-efficacy), by increasing their ability for self-care. The nurse’s contribution is vital in empowering patients and supporting them to better manage their disease. There is evidence that higher nurse staffing levels are associated with better patient outcomes in acute care settings, but little is known about the outpatient setting. The objective of this study was to explore the impact of multidisciplinary team care with abundant nurse staffing levels on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among patients with IBD, encompassing Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), in clinical remission.MethodsPatients with IBD in clinical remission were included because disease activity influences the patient’s subjective evaluation. A total of 499 valid responses from two different sources were analyzed: 318 from a specialized IBD clinic with abundant nurse staffing and a multidisciplinary care team (UC: 83, CD: 235) and 181 from an online survey panel (UC: 109, CD: 72). The IBD Self-Efficacy Scale (IBD-SES) and the difficulty of life scale (DLS) were used as disease-specific PROMs.ResultsIn two multiple regression models adjusted by background characteristics (age, sex, diagnosis [UC/CD], employment status, use of biologics, and disease duration) using the IBD-SES or DLS as a dependent variable, the responses from clinic patients showed a more favorable score (higher self-efficacy or lower difficulty) than the online responses.ConclusionsMultidisciplinary team care with abundant nurse staffing may improve self-efficacy and ease difficulties of life among patients with IBD in clinical remission. These results could help bring attention to nurse staffing in an outpatient setting, which has previously been overlooked, and be the first to provide evidence of its importance in encouraging enhanced staffing levels.

Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma: A protocol for a systematic review

Background Neurocognitive disorders (NCDs), including delirium, cognitive impairment, or dementia are prevalent in up to 39% of older adults in acute care, particularly older trauma patients. Undiagnosed NCDs result in poor outcomes, such as increased incidence of depressive symptoms, longer length of stay, and mortality. Objective This study aims to identify the diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of NCDs in older trauma patients in acute settings. Design Systematic review protocol. Literature search Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library) will be searched for journal articles. Search terms related to NCDs, delirium and cognitive screening tools, and diagnostic accuracy will be included. Study selection criteria Cross-sectional, prospective, or retrospective cohort studies of adults aged ≥60 post-trauma, in an acute setting, will be included where the study aimed to validate a screening tool for detection of 1) delirium or 2) cognitive impairment, or dementia against a reference standard of a clinical decision, based on standardised diagnostic criteria or a validated tool. Data synthesis Two review authors will conduct study selection, data extraction, and appraisal. Data will be extracted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) checklist. Studies will be assessed for methodological quality by two independent review authors using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Narrative summaries will be generated describing risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability. Quantitative synthesis of study findings will be conducted. Conclusion This systematic review will aim to identify screening tools with the best diagnostic accuracy for detection of 1) delirium and 2) cognitive impairment or dementia in adults aged ≥60 post-trauma in acute care settings. Results will inform clinical practice to enhance the probability of patients with NCDs receiving appropriate care and management. Registration PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024518730 (11/03/2024).