The topic of crustal permeability is of broad interest in light of the controlling effect of permeability on diverse geologic processes and also timely in light of the practical challenges associated with emerging technologies such as hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas production (‘fracking’), enhanced geothermal systems, and geologic carbon sequestration. This special issue of Geofluids is also motivated by the historical dichotomy between the hydrogeologic concept of permeability as a static material property that exerts control on fluid flow and the perspective of economic geologists, geophysicists, and crustal petrologists who have long recognized permeability as a dynamic parameter that changes in response to tectonism, fluid production, and geochemical reactions. Issues associated with fracking, enhanced geothermal systems, and geologic carbon sequestration have already begun to promote a constructive dialog between the static and dynamic views of permeability, and here we have made a conscious effort to include both viewpoints. This special issue also focuses on the quantification of permeability, encompassing both direct measurement of permeability in the uppermost crust and inferential permeability estimates, mainly for the deeper crust. The directly measured permeability (k) of common geologic media varies by approximately 16 orders of magnitude, from values as low as 10 m in intact crystalline rock, intact shales, and fault gouge, to values as high as 10 m in well-sorted gravels. The permeability of Earth’s upper crust can be regarded as a process-limiting parameter, in that it largely determines the feasibility of advective solute transport (k ~ >10 20 m), advective heat transport (k ~ ≥10 16 m), and the generation of elevated fluid pressures (k ~ ≤10 17 m) – processes which in turn are essential to ore deposition, hydrocarbon migration, metamorphism, tectonism, and many other fundamental geologic phenomena. The hydrodynamics of fluids in the brittle upper crust, where topography and magmatic heat sources dominate patterns of flow and externally derived (meteoric) fluids are common (e.g. Howald et al. 2015) are distinct from the ductile lower crust, dominated by devolatilization reactions and internally derived fluids (e.g. Connolly & Podladchikov, 2015). The brittle–ductile transition between these regimes occurs at 10–15 km depth in typical continental crust. Permeability below the brittle–ductile transition is non-negligible, at least in active orogenic belts (equivalent to mean bulk k of order 10 19 to 10 18 m) so that the underlying ductile regime can be an important fluid source to the brittle regime (e.g. Ingebritsen & Manning 2002). The overall objective of this special issue is to synthesize current understanding of static and dynamic permeability through representative publications from multiple disciplines. The objective of this introduction to the special issue is to define crucial nomenclature and the ‘static’ and ‘dynamic’ permeability perspectives and to briefly summarize the contents of this special issue, which is divided into the following sections: the physics of permeability, static permeability, and dynamic permeability.
Read full abstract