You have accessJournal of UrologyKidney Cancer: Basic Research1 Apr 2011230 THE RENAL CELL CARCINOMA SIDE POPULATION: THE POTENTIAL USE OF TARGETED AGENTS AS NOVEL MDR MODULATORS TO CIRCUMVENT CHEMORESISTANCE Matthew Liew, Thomas Tawadros, Claire Hart, Michael Brown, and Noel Clarke Matthew LiewMatthew Liew Manchester, United Kingdom More articles by this author , Thomas TawadrosThomas Tawadros Manchester, United Kingdom More articles by this author , Claire HartClaire Hart Manchester, United Kingdom More articles by this author , Michael BrownMichael Brown Manchester, United Kingdom More articles by this author , and Noel ClarkeNoel Clarke Manchester, United Kingdom More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.299AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the commonest malignant renal tumour accounting for 60,000 new cases and 13,000 deaths in the US per year. The only curative treatment is surgery in early stage disease, as metastatic disease is highly chemo-resistant with response rates of less than 6%. A key mechanism of chemoresistance is the ability to efflux chemotherapeutic agents via multidrug resistant pumps (MDR), where MDR expression has been correlated with a poorer prognosis. We have previously shown that RCC tumours contain a verapamil sensitive side population (SP), as defined by their ability to efflux the fluorescent dye Hoechst 33342. Moreover, recent reports have suggested that the newer ‘targeted' agents used in metastatic RCC may also target MDR. The objective of this study was to assess the ability of targeted agents to sensitise RCC to other chemotherapeutic agents. METHODS RCC SP and Non-SP populations were treated with various chemotherapeutic agents. IC50 values were determined by SRB assay and drug efflux by FACS and fluorescence microscopy. Combination studies were also conducted using verapamil, temsirolimus, sunitinib and sorafenib as potential MDR inhibitors. RESULTS Verapamil sensitive SPs were isolated from 5 out of the 8 RCC cell lines tested. The 2245R cell line had the highest SP (6.0 ± 4.6%), and was chosen for further studies. The IC50 values for the SP, compared to the non SP, was significantly higher with docetaxel, paclitaxel, adriamycin and etoposide (5.4 vs 3.3, 42 vs 13, 90 vs 48 nM, and 11.6 vs 8.8 μM respectively). There was no difference seen between sub-populations treated with cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil. Retention of adriamycin fluorescence following treatment was significantly lower in the SP using FACS and fluorescent microscopy techniques. Sunitinib, sorafenib and temsirolimus were able to block the SP at ìM concentrations with a similar efficiency to verapamil, and these agents were able to reverse the enhanced chemoresistance observed in the SP. CONCLUSIONS We have shown that the SP cells are the chemo-resistant sub-population in RCC cell lines and established that the increased resistance seen is via active drug efflux pump mechanisms. We have also demonstrated that this process can be reversed using ‘targeted' agents as novel MDR modulators. This data indicate that the use of conventional chemotherapy should be considered in future RCC trials using ‘targeted' agents. © 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e94 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2011 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Matthew Liew Manchester, United Kingdom More articles by this author Thomas Tawadros Manchester, United Kingdom More articles by this author Claire Hart Manchester, United Kingdom More articles by this author Michael Brown Manchester, United Kingdom More articles by this author Noel Clarke Manchester, United Kingdom More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract