AcrySof Natural Intraocular Lens Research Articles

Contrast Sensitivity and Spherical Aberration in Eyes Implanted with AcrySof IQ and AcrySof Natural Intraocular Lens: the Results of a Meta-Analysis

BackgroundTo systematically evaluate the visual performance of aspheric AcrySof IQ and spherical AcrySof Natural intraocular lens (IOL) after cataract surgery.Methodology/Principal FindingsPotential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved implanting AcrySof IQ and AcrySof Natural were searched from PubMed, Web of science, EMBASE, Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals Databases and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed by the Jadad method. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity and spherical aberration were pooled using a random-effects model. Seven studies were identified and analyzed to compare AcrySof IQ (236 eyes) with AcrySof Natural (232 eyes) after phacoemulsification. There was no significant difference in postoperative BCVA between AcrySof IQ and AcrySof Natural (p =0.137) after a follow up of 3 months. For contrast sensitivity, these differences reached statistical significance under photopic conditions at two spatial frequencies (3 cycles per degree (cpd), 6 cpd, 12 cpd, and 18 cpd; p =0.022, p =0.017, p = 0.065, and p=0.191, respectively) and under mesopic conditions at three spatial frequencies (3 cpd, 6 cpd, 12 cpd, and 18 cpd; p =0.007, p =0.033, p =0.030, and p =0.080, respectively). Eyes with AcrySof IQ also had statistically significant less spherical aberration than eyes with AcrySof Natural (p<0.001). Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were relatively stable and reliable.Conclusions/SignificanceThe overall findings indicate that AcrySof IQ with a modified aspheric surface induced significantly less spherical aberration than AcrySof Natural. Contrast sensitivity in eyes with AcrySof IQ is better than that in eyes with AcrySof Natural, especially under mesopic conditions.

Alpins and thibos vectorial astigmatism analyses: proposal of a linear regression model between methods

OBJETIVO: Estabelecer modelos de regressão linear entre os índices propostos por Alpins com os vetores astigmáticos de Thibos, avaliando a validade e a força dessas correlações. MÉTODOS: Série de casos na qual foram avaliados prospectivamente 62 olhos de 31 pacientes de catarata com astigmatismo corneano pré-operatório entre 0,75 e 2,50 dioptrias para ambos os olhos. Os pacientes foram aleatoriamente distribuídos entre 2 grupos: um submetido a implante de lente intraocular (LIO) AcrySof ToricTM em ambos os olhos e outro grupo, [...]

Visual performance of Acrysof ReSTOR compared with a monofocal intraocular lens following implantation in cataract surgery

The aim of this study was to compare the visual performance of Acrysof ReSTOR and Acrysof Natural intraocular lenses (IOLs) following cataract surgery. A randomized prospective study was performed in which 64 eyes (51 patients) were divided randomly into two groups. Monofocal IOLs (Acrysof Natural) were implanted into 34 eyes (27 patients) and multifocal IOLs (Acrysof ReSTOR) were implanted into 30 eyes (24 patients) using phacoemulsification surgery. The corrected distance visual acuity, near visual acuity, pseudoaccommodation, contrast sensitivity (CS) and wavefront analysis were measured at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after surgery. The distance vision of the monofocal and ReSTOR patients improved equally with glasses (P<0.05). A greater improvement in near vision without glasses was observed in the ReSTOR-implanted patients (P<0.01). The CS values of the multifocal IOL group were significantly lower than those of the monofocal IOL group for all spatial frequencies tested (P<0.05). The spherical aberration was significantly higher in the multifocal IOL group compared with the monofocal IOL group (P<0.05). We observed no differences in coma between the two groups. The difference in the amplitude of pseudoaccommodation between the two groups was statistically significant (−3.14±0.91 D in the ReSTOR group vs. −1.03±0.33 D in the Natural group, P<0.01). The improvement in near vision was significantly more evident in the ReSTOR patients. Compared with the monofocal IOL lens, the multifocal lens is able to increase the amplitude of pseudoaccommodation. However, increased spherical aberration may contribute to lower CS values in the multifocal IOL group.

Accelerated 20-year sunlight exposure simulation of a photochromic foldable intraocular lens in a rabbit model

To assess the long-term biocompatibility and photochromic stability of a new photochromic hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) under extended ultraviolet (UV) light exposure. John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Experimental study. A Matrix Aurium photochromic IOL was implanted in right eyes and a Matrix Acrylic IOL without photochromic properties (n = 6) or a single-piece AcrySof Natural SN60AT IOL (n = 5) in left eyes of 11 New Zealand rabbits. The rabbits were exposed to a UV light source of 5 mW/cm(2) for 3 hours during every 8-hour period, equivalent to 9 hours a day, and followed for up to 12 months. The photochromic changes were evaluated during slitlamp examination by shining a penlight UV source in the right eye. After the rabbits were humanely killed and the eyes enucleated, study and control IOLs were explanted and evaluated in vitro on UV exposure and studied histopathologically. The photochromic IOL was as biocompatible as the control IOLs after 12 months under conditions simulating at least 20 years of UV exposure. In vitro evaluation confirmed the retained optical properties, with photochromic changes observed within 7 seconds of UV exposure. The rabbit eyes had clinical and histopathological changes expected in this model with a 12-month follow-up. The new photochromic IOL turned yellow only on exposure to UV light. The photochromic changes were reversible, reproducible, and stable over time. The IOL was biocompatible with up to 12 months of accelerated UV exposure simulation.

Reduced effect of glare disability on driving performance in patients with blue light–filtering intraocular lenses

To compare the effects of glare on driving performance in patients who had implantation of a blue light-filtering acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) and those who had implantation of an acrylic IOL with no blue-light filter. Department of Applied Psychology, Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona, USA. Cross-sectional study. Patients with a blue light-filtering AcrySof Natural SN60AT IOL (study group) and patients with an AcrySof SA60AT IOL with no blue-light filter (control group) who had good visual acuity and a valid driver's license performed left-turn maneuvers in a driving simulator in front of oncoming traffic. The safety margin (time to collision minus time taken to turn at intersection with oncoming traffic) was calculated. The measurements were repeated with a glare source simulating low-angle sun conditions (daytime driving). With glare, the safety margin was statistically significantly greater in the study group (n= 17) than in the control group (n = 17) (mean 2.534 seconds ± 0.488 [SD] and 2.116 ± 0.511 seconds, respectively) (P < .05). Comparing no-glare conditions and glare conditions, the study group had significantly lower glare susceptibility, fewer collisions with the oncoming car, and a lower impact on intersection approach speed than the control group. The IOL incorporating blue light-filtering technology significantly reduced glare disability and improved the driver's ability to safely execute a left turn with oncoming traffic in the presence of glare simulating low-angle sun conditions. The real-world benefit of this technology is presumably mediated by a stronger signal to detect approaching objects (motion-in-depth) as a result of a reduction in glare disability. No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes.

Ocular wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with AcrySof IQ or AcrySof Natural intraocular lenses

This study aimed to compare ocular wavefront aberrations for pupil diameters of 4 mm and 6 mm, and contrast sensitivity, in eyes with AcrySof IQ and AcrySof Natural intraocular lenses (IOLs). Sixty eyes of 60 patients were enrolled in this prospective randomized study. After phacoemulsification the eyes received either AcrySof IQ SN60WF or AcrySof Natural SN60AT IOLs. One month after surgery, all patients underwent complete ophthalmological examination including corneal topography, wavefront analysis for pupil diameters of 4 mm and 6 mm, and contrast sensitivity measurements with the CSV 1000E instrument under photopic and mesopic conditions with and without glare. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in age, sex or other preoperative ocular characteristics (p > 0.05). Patients with AcrySof IQ IOLs had higher contrast sensitivity at 6 c.p.d. under photopic conditions, at 6 c.p.d. and 18 c.p.d. under mesopic conditions, and at 6 c.p.d., 12 c.p.d. and 18 c.p.d. under mesopic conditions with glare (p < 0.05). Corneal spherical aberration was 0.273 ± 0.074 μm in the AcrySof Natural group and 0.294 ± 0.086 μm in the AcrySof IQ group (p = 0489). Ocular spherical aberration was 0.362 ± 0.141 μm and 0.069 ± 0.043 μm (p < 0.001) for 6-mm diameter pupils and 0.143 ± 0.091 μm and 0.017 ± 0.016 μm (p < 0.001) for 4-mm diameter pupils, with AcrySof Natural and AcrySof IQ IOLs, respectively. There were no significant differences in other higher-order aberrations between the groups (p > 0.05). Aspherical AcrySof IQ IOLs significantly reduced spherical aberration for pupil diameters of both 4 mm and 6 mm and also improved contrast sensitivity more than spherical AcrySof Natural IOLs, especially in mesopic conditions.

Augmentation of Macular Pigment following Implantation of Blue Light–Filtering Intraocular Lenses at the Time of Cataract Surgery

(Photo)-oxidative stress is believed to play a role in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), with the threshold for retinal damage being lowest for short-wavelength (blue) light. Macular pigment (MP), consisting of the carotenoids lutein (L), zeaxanthin (Z) and meso-Z, has a maximum absorption at 460 nm and protects the retina from (photo)-oxidative injury. This study was designed to investigate whether the blue light-filtering properties of the Alcon AcrySof Natural intraocular lens (ANIOL) implanted during cataract surgery affects MP optical density (MPOD). Forty-two patients scheduled for cataract surgery were recruited for the study. These patients all had a preoperative best corrected visual acuity rating (BCVAR) of at least 0.5 (logMAR) in the study eye. The patients were randomized to have either the standard Alcon AcrySof three-piece acrylic intraocular lens (AIOL) (controls) or the ANIOL implanted at the time of cataract surgery. The spatial profile of MPOD (i.e., at 0.25 degrees, 0.5 degrees, 1.0 degrees, and 1.75 degrees eccentricity) was measured with customized heterochromatic flicker photometry (cHFP) 1 week before and 1 week after surgery, and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Serum concentrations of L and Z were also measured at each study visit. There was a highly significant and positive correlation between all MPODs (e.g., at 0.25 degrees) recorded 1 week before and after surgery in eyes with an AIOL implant (r = 0.915, P < 0.01; paired samples t-test, P = 0.631) and in those ANIOL implants (r = 0.868, P < 0.01; paired samples t-test, P = 0.719). Average MPOD across the retina increased significantly with time (after 3 months) in the ANIOL group (repeated-measures, general linear model, P < 0.05), but remained stable in the AIOL group (repeated-measures, general linear model, P > 0.05). There were no significant time or lens effects observed for serum L over the study period (P > 0.05). There was a significant time effect for serum Z over the study period (P < 0.05), but not a significant time/lens interaction (P > 0.05). Customized HFP can reliably measure the MPOD spatial profile in the presence of lens opacity, and cataract surgery does not artifactually alter MPOD readings. This study also provides evidence that implanting an IOL that filters blue light is associated with augmentation of MPOD in the absence of raised serum concentrations of L and Z. However, further and longitudinal study is needed to assess whether the observed increase in MPOD after implantation of blue-filtering IOLs is associated with reduced risk of AMD development and/or progression.

The Effect of the AcrySof Natural Lens on Glare Disability and Photostress

To investigate whether implanting "blue-filtering" yellow intraocular lenses (IOL) could provide a visual benefit in terms of glare disability and photostress recovery. A case-control study. Researchers masked to group assignments tested 58 subjects: 17 with yellow IOLs (AcrySof Natural; SN60WF; Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, Texas, USA), 20 with clear IOLs, and 21 phakic controls. Photostress recovery and visual acuity under veiling glare conditions were assessed in a Maxwellian view optical system. Photostress recovery was assessed by measuring the time required to detect a grating stimulus (1 degree diameter) after a 5-second exposure to an intense circular disk (1 degree diameter) of broad-band xenon light. For the veiling glare experiment, subjects fixated on the grating stimulus, and the intensity of a broad-band xenon annulus (the glare source, 10 degrees inner, 12 degrees outer diameter) was adjusted until the grating stimulus was no longer seen. Subjects with AcrySof Natural (P < .0001) and clear IOLs (P < .035) could withstand significantly more light than the phakic controls. Subjects with the AcrySof Natural lens could withstand significantly more light (P < .02) than subjects with clear IOLs. Photostress recovery was significantly longer for subjects with clear IOLs vs phakic controls (P < .01), but the AcrySof Natural lens was not different from phakic controls (P < .09). Photostress recovery was similar between subjects with clear or AcrySof Natural lens (P < .32). The AcrySof Natural lens is related to reduced glare disability relative to a clear IOL or phakic controls.

New approach to evaluate retinal protection by intraocular lenses against age-related lipofuscin accumulation–mediated retinal phototoxicity

To present a new approach for evaluating intraocular lenses (IOLs) for retinal protection from age-related lipofuscin accumulation-mediated phototoxicity. Alcon Laboratories Inc., Fort Worth, Texas, USA, and Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom. Age-related lipofuscin accumulation-mediated action spectra for retinal phototoxicity in an aphakic eye were created for this evaluation. Transmission curves for 6 IOLs and for cornea and spectral radiant power distribution for sunlight and 2 lamps were used. Pseudophakic action spectra and retinal phototoxicity for 3 wavelength ranges and 3 ages were computed. The percentage protection of each IOL was computed as the reduction in phototoxicity relative to the aphakic eye. Retinal phototoxicity increased 3.66 times from the third to ninth decade of age. The comparative retinal phototoxicity and retinal protection provided by IOLs were dependent on the light source and range of wavelength; however, unlike phototoxicity, retinal protection was independent of age. The 420 to 480 nm range was the most useful for discriminating protection by IOLs. Retinal phototoxicity significantly increased with age; however, the retinal protection by IOLs was independent of age. The interaction between the transmission curve of IOLs and light sources required inclusion of widely used lamps besides sunlight for evaluation of IOLs. For the 420 to 480 nm wavelength range, the 3 light sources clearly discriminated the protection provided by IOLs. The AcrySof Natural IOL (Alcon) provided the highest protection consistently for the tested light sources.

Postoperative Optical Aberrations in Eyes Implanted With AcrySof Spherical and Aspheric Intraocular Lenses

To evaluate and compare optical and visual quality of eyes implanted with spherical and aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs). Twenty eyes of 17 patients were implanted with the AcrySof Natural IQ aspheric IOL (SN60WF) and 20 eyes of 15 patients were implanted with the AcrySof Natural spherical IOL (SN60AT). Photopic monocular distance best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was recorded at 6 months postoperatively. Corneal aberrations were measured with the CSO Eyetop topographer, and ocular aberrations were measured with a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer for a 6-mm pupil. Ocular spherical aberration was computed for different pupil diameters (3, 4, 5, and 6 mm). No statistically significant differences were found between the BSCVA of the AcrySof IQ IOL (0.023 +/- 0.004 logMAR) and AcrySof Natural IOL (0.031 +/- 0.003 logMAR) (P = .15). The corneal higher order aberrations showed no statistically significant differences between groups (P > .1). However, spherical aberration and higher order ocular aberrations in the AcrySof IQ eyes were lower than eyes implanted with the AcrySof Natural IOL (P < .01). A statistically significant increase in the spherical aberration coefficient with pupil diameter was found only for the spherical IOL group (P = .0023). Statistically significant differences in the spherical aberration coefficient were found between groups at all pupil diameters (P < .001). A significant reduction in ocular spherical aberration was noted after AcrySof IQ IOL implantation at all pupil diameters compared to the spherical IOL, although photopic BSCVA between groups remained similar.

Ocular aberrations and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery with AcrySof IQ intraocular lens implantation: Clinical comparative study

To determine whether implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL) with a modified posterior aspherical surface (AcrySof IQ, Alcon Surgical Laboratories) results in reduced ocular aberrations (spherical aberration) and improved contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery. Brasilia Ophthalmologic Hospital, Brasilia, and Sao Geraldo Eye Hospital, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. In an intraindividual randomized prospective study of 25 patients with bilateral cataract, an IOL with a modified posterior surface (AcrySof IQ) was compared with a biconvex IOL with spherical surfaces (AcrySof Natural, Alcon). Ocular aberrations with a 5.0 mm and 6.0 mm pupil were measured with a Hartmann-Shack aberrometer. Quality of vision was measured by visual acuity and contrast sensitivity under mesopic and photopic conditions. All patients were followed for 3 months. There were no statistically significant differences between eyes in postoperative uncorrected and best corrected distance visual acuities after a follow-up of 1 month and 3 months. Postoperatively, there was a statistically significant between-group difference in contrast sensitivity under photopic conditions without glare at 18 cycles per degree (cpd) (P = .04) and under mesopic conditions without glare at all spatial frequencies (3 cpd, 6 cpd, 12 cpd, and 18 cpd; P = .03, P = .009, P = .003, and P = .003, respectively) and with glare at 3 cpd and 6 cpd (P = .001 and P = .02, respectively). The difference in higher-order aberration (HOA) values between groups was statistically significant with a 5.0 mm and 6.0 mm pupil, with the AcrySof IQ IOL inducing less HOA than the AcrySof Natural IOL. Eyes with an AcrySof IQ IOL also had statistically significant less spherical aberration than eyes with an AcrySof Natural IOL with both pupil diameters (P<.001). The AcrySof IQ IOL with a modified posterior surface induced significantly less HOA and spherical aberration than the AcrySof Natural IOL. Contrast sensitivity was better under mesopic conditions with the AcrySof IQ IOL.

Prospective visual evaluation of apodized diffractive intraocular lenses

To evaluate distance, intermediate, and near visual performance in patients who had multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain. The best corrected distance visual acuity, best distance-corrected near visual acuity, intermediate visual acuity, distance contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions, and patient satisfaction were measured in 325 patients and 335 patients who had bilateral implantation of the model SA60D3 IOL (AcrySof ReSTOR, Alcon) and model SN60D3 IOL (AcrySof Natural ReSTOR), respectively. At the 6-month postoperative visit, binocular best corrected distance acuity with the ReSTOR IOL and the Natural ReSTOR IOL was 0.034 logMAR+/-0.004 (SD) and 0.019+/-0.020 logMAR, respectively (approximately 20/20). Binocular best distance-corrected near acuity was 0.011+/-0.012 logMAR and 0.035+/-0.013 logMAR, respectively (approximately 20/20). Intermediate visual acuity with both IOL models worsened significantly as a function of the distance of the test (P<.01). Photopic contrast sensitivity was within the standard normal range with both IOLs. Under mesopic conditions, contrast sensitivity with both IOLs was comparable to that with monofocal IOLs and lower, particularly at higher spatial frequencies, than under photopic conditions. No statistically significant differences in visual acuity or photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity were found between the 2 IOL models (P>.1). A patient satisfaction questionnaire showed that both IOLs performed well and were comparable in satisfaction regarding distance, intermediate, and near activities under different lighting conditions. The AcrySof ReSTOR IOL and AcrySof Natural ReSTOR IOL provided good visual performance at distance and near under photopic and mesopic conditions. Intermediate vision with both models was reduced compared with distance and near vision.

Contrast sensitivity and glare disability after implantation of AcrySof IQ Natural aspherical intraocular lens: Prospective randomized masked clinical trial

To evaluate contrast sensitivity and glare disability after implantation of an AcrySof IQ Natural SN60WF aspherical intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon Laboratories). Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India. One hundred twenty consecutive patients who had phacoemulsification in a prospective triple-masked trial were randomized to receive an AcrySof SA60AT IOL (40 eyes), AcrySof Natural SN60AT IOL (40 eyes), or AcrySof IQ SN60WF IOL (40 eyes). At 3 months, contrast sensitivity was measured using the CSV-1000E contrast sensitivity chart test face (Vector Vision) at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degrees (cpd) under photopic conditions (85 cd/m(2)) and mesopic conditions (2.7 cd/m(2)) with 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm fixed central apertures, with and without glare. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used and a pair-wise comparison performed. The main outcome measure was the difference in contrast sensitivity between IOLs at each spatial frequency. The best corrected visual acuity was similar between the 3 IOL groups (P = .6). The AcrySof IQ group had significantly higher contrast sensitivity at 18 cpd under photopic conditions (P = .008); at 3, 6, 12, and 18 cpd during mesopic testing with a 4.0 mm aperture without glare (P = .018, P = .011, P = .007, and P = .0001, respectively) and with glare (P = .003, P = .006, P = .005, and P = .004, respectively); and at all spatial frequencies during mesopic testing with a 6.0 mm aperture without glare (P = .018, P = .006, P = .009, and P = .0001, respectively) and with glare (P = .019, P = .002, P = .01, and P = .017, respectively). Eyes with the AcrySof IQ SN60WF IOL had significantly higher contrast sensitivity than eyes with an AcrySof SA60AT or AcrySof Natural SN60AT IOL at all spatial frequencies during mesopic testing (with and without glare) with 4.0 and 6.0 mm artificial pupil.

Effect of a yellow intraocular lens on scotopic vision, glare disability, and blue color perception

To compare the photopic and scotopic contrast sensitivity with and without glare as well as blue color perception between eyes with an AcrySof SN60AT Natural intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon Laboratories Inc.) and eyes with a conventional AcrySof SA60AT IOL. Ankara University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey. Right eyes of 38 patients with an AcrySof Natural IOL and right eyes of 38 age-matched patients with a conventional AcrySof SA60AT IOL were included in a study. Contrast sensitivity was measured with the Functional Acuity Contrast Test under photopic conditions. Scotopic contrast sensitivity in the presence or absence of glare was measured using the Mesotest II (Oculus GmbH). Blue-green color vision was evaluated with the Moreland equation of the HMC Anomaloskop MR (Oculus GmbH). The mean age of patients was 66.6 years +/- 8.2 (SD) in the Natural IOL group and 66.4 +/- 8.0 years in the conventional IOL group. There was no statistically significant difference in photopic contrast sensitivity, scotopic contrast sensitivity with and without glare, or disability glare between the 2 groups (P>.05). Photopic and scotopic contrast sensitivity with and without glare significantly decreased with age in both groups (P<.01). There was no statistically significant difference in anomaloscope scores between the 2 groups (P>.05). The Moreland middle match point showed a significant shift toward blue with age in both groups (P<.01). The AcrySof SN60AT Natural IOL provided contrast sensitivity under photopic and scotopic conditions (with and without glare) and blue color perception comparable that obtained with the AcrySof SA60AT IOL. Scotopic vision and blue color discrimination decreased with age with both IOLs.

Comparison of visual function following implantation of Acrysof Natural intraocular lenses with conventional intraocular lenses

Recently an intraocular lens (IOL) has been introduced which blocks blue light. As blocking blue light may be to the patient's detriment, this study was designed to evaluate visual function following implantation of a blue-blocking (Acrysof Natural) IOL. Patients were recruited for this non-randomized controlled interventional study, from those attending a private rural ophthalmology clinic for cataract surgery (n = 93). Only those who had previously had a conventional IOL implanted into one eye were offered an Acrysof Natural IOL for the second eye. Postoperatively patients underwent refracted Snellen visual acuity, contrast sensitivity using a CSV-1000E instrument and colour vision testing using a Farnsworth D-15 test, with a subset (n = 20) undergoing a Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test. Results were then compared between eyes. Finally, a subset (n = 63) completed a survey designed to assess the subjective impact of the Acrysof Natural IOL. There were no statistically significant differences between eyes implanted with conventional IOLs compared with Acrysof Natural IOLs for visual acuity (t = 0.57; P = 0.57), contrast sensitivity (t = 0.43; P = 0.67 for 3 cycles per degree [cpd], t = 0.56; P = 0.58 for 6 cpd, t = 0.09; P = 0.93 for 12 cpd and t = 0.16; P = 0.87 for 18 cpd) or colour vision with the Farnsworth D-15 (Chi(2) = 0.38; P = 0.55) or the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-Hue test t = 0.34; P = 0.74). Most subjects reported that they could not tell a difference between the two IOLs subjectively or that any difference experienced was not significant. Our sample did not show any significant differences between eyes implanted with conventional IOLs and the Acrysof Natural IOL. We would suggest that the Acrysof Natural IOL may be used without any significant difference in visual function.

AcrySof Natural intraocular lens optical characteristics during and after different doses of ultraviolet-visible light illumination

To determine the optical transmission properties of a recently introduced intraocular lens (IOL) (AcrySof Natural SN60AT, Alcon Laboratories) and compare them with those of a conventional IOL (AcrySof SA60AT, Alcon Laboratories) after ultraviolet (UV)-visible light irradiation. Eye Clinic and Department of Clinical Physiopathology, University of Florence, and the National Institute of Applied Optics, Florence, Italy. Two IOLs, the AcrySof Natural with a UV and blue-light filter and the AcrySof without a blue-light filter, were studied. Three IOLs of each model with different dioptric powers were examined in two experimental setups. The samples were stressed with very high irradiance to reproduce light aging, and the transmission properties of the IOLs were studied. No significant decrease in transmission was found at a UV-visible light dose equivalent to 100 years of light aging. The AcrySof Natural IOL has stable optical characteristics.

Wavefront Analysis and Contrast Sensitivity of Aspheric and Spherical Intraocular Lenses: A Randomized Prospective Study

To compare visual performance, total and high order wavefront aberrations (coma, spherical aberration, and other terms), and contrast sensitivity in 120 eyes implanted with one monofocal aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) and two spherical IOLs. Randomized prospective study. Sixty patients were randomized to receive three IOL types: Alcon AcrySofIQ (40 eyes), AcrySofNatural (40 eyes), and advanced medical optic (AMO)Sensar (40 eyes). Complete ophthalmologic examination including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal topography, and wavefront analysis were performed preoperatively, 30 days, and 90 days postoperatively. Pelli-Robson chart test and functional acuity contrast testing (FACT-Optec6500) were performed approximately 50 days after surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis chi(2), analysis of variance (ANOVA), and multiple comparisons Tukey test. After 90 days, all eyes had postoperative BSCVA > or =20/32. The AcrySofIQ IOL showed statistically significant less induction of spherical aberration (P < .001) when compared with the AMOSensar and the AcrySofNatural IOLs. The AMOSensar presented significantly less spherical aberration then the AcrySofNatural (P < .05). The AcrySofIQ also had lower values of total and high-order aberration (HOA) (P < .05) when compared with the AMOSensar and the AcrySofNatural. The mean values of trefoil 9, coma, and HOA root mean square (RMS) decreased between one and three months (P < .001, P < .001, P = .023, P < .001, respectively) in all groups. Mean Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity values in photopic condition were similar between the groups. The AcrySofIQ showed better results in 3cpd spatial frequency in mesopic condition using FACT-Optec 6500 (P = .008), although there were no statistical differences in photopic and mesopic with glare conditions.

Effect of the AcrySof Natural intraocular lens on blue–yellow perimetry

To assess the differences in blue-yellow perimetry values in patients with an AcrySof Natural intraocular lens (IOL) in 1 eye and a conventional AcrySof IOL in the fellow eye. Cataract and glaucoma clinics of a medical school associated with a public hospital in Brazil. Forty-six patients had bilateral phacoemulsification and implantation of an AcrySof SN60AT IOL (Alcon) in 1 eye and an MA30AC IOL (Alcon) in the fellow eye. Blue-yellow perimetry was performed in both eyes, and the data were analyzed in blinded fashion using the Mann-Whitney U test. No statistically significant differences were observed in short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) values between the 2 IOLs. There was no interference by the yellow filter of the AcrySof Natural IOL in blue-yellow perception as determined by SWAP.

Visual performance: Comparison of foldable intraocular lenses

To compare best distance visual acuity, color perception, and contrast sensitivity between eyes with an AcrySof Natural intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon Laboratories Inc.) and fellow eye with an AcrySof IOL and to compare results in the IOL groups to those in normal, similarly aged patients with clear phakic eyes. Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya, Guwahati, India. This prospective randomized parallel group single-center patient-masked examiner-masked study comprised 26 eyes of 13 healthy patients with bilateral age-related cataract. All patients had cataract surgery by phacoemulsification in both eyes; 1 eye received an AcrySof Natural IOL (SN60AT) and the fellow eye, an AcrySof (SA60AT) IOL. Final postoperative examination was performed at the end of 18 months. In addition to other findings, visual acuity, color perception, and contrast sensitivity were recorded. A group of normal, similarly aged phakic individuals with clear lenses was examined for contrast sensitivity. The records thus obtained were analyzed statistically. The AcrySof and AcrySof Natural IOL groups had a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity and color perception in comparison to preoperative status, and this was maintained until the last postoperative follow-up at 18 months. There was no statistically significant difference in the findings between the 2 IOL groups. The AcrySof and the AcrySof Natural IOL groups showed significant improvement in contrast sensitivity from the preoperative to the postoperative period (both P < .001). However, the AcrySof Natural IOL group was better than the AcrySof IOL group when each group was compared separately to similarly aged phakic individuals with clear lenses. Pseudophakia following AcrySof Natural SN60AT and AcrySof SA60AT IOL implantation led to equivalent visual acuity and color perception. But the contrast sensitivity in the AcrySof Natural group was better and near normal in reference to a healthy, age-matched control group.

Color perception with AcrySof Natural and AcrySof single-piece intraocular lenses under photopic and mesopic conditions

To examine color perception in patients receiving bilateral implantation of an ultraviolet (UV) and blue-light filtering intraocular lens (IOL) (AcrySof Natural SN60AT, Alcon Laboratories Inc.) or a UV-only filtering IOL (AcrySof SA60AT) and to compare the results with those in a phakic group. Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. In this prospective study, age-matched subjects who passed the Ishihara test and had visual acuities of 20/25 or better were recruited. There were 2 pseudophakic groups (bilateral SN60AT or SA60AT IOLs) and 1 phakic group. The Farnsworth-Munsell (FM) 100-hue test was administered to each subject twice under different conditions. The phakic and AcrySof Natural SN60AT groups were tested under photopic and mesopic conditions. The SA60AT subjects were further divided into subgroups (with and without yellow clip-on lenses) and tested under photopic and mesopic conditions. A 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the square-root-transformed total error score showed no statistical differences (P = .637) between the treatment groups. Similarly, a 1-way ANOVA of the red-green error score (P = .729) and blue-yellow error score (P = .484) indicated no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups. The ANOVA results of the FM 100-hue test under mesopic conditions showed that the total error score in the AcrySof Natural IOL group was significantly lower (P = .046) than in the phakic group. There were no between-group differences in error scores under mesopic conditions. The FM 100-hue testing showed no difference in color perception between subjects with AcrySof Natural IOLs and those in an age-matched phakic control group or in those with a UV-only filtering AcrySof IOL with or without yellow clip-on lenses.