Accuracy Of Endoscopic Ultrasonography Research Articles

Study of preoperative diagnostic modalities in Chinese patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUNDEndoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and magnifying endoscopy (ME) reliably determine indications for endoscopic resection in patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC). ME is widely accepted for predicting the invasion depth of superficial esophageal cancer with satisfying accuracy. However, the addition of EUS is controversial.AIMTo evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of ME vs EUS for invasion depth prediction and investigate the influencing factors in patients with SESCC to determine the best diagnostic model in China.METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed patients with suspected SESCC who completed both ME and EUS and then underwent endoscopic or surgical resection at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center between January 2018 and December 2021. We evaluated and compared the diagnostic efficiency of EUS and ME according to histological results, and investigated the influencing factors.RESULTSWe included 152 lesions from 144 patients in this study. The diagnostic accuracies of ME and EUS in differentiating invasion depth were not significantly different (73.0% and 66.4%, P = 0.24); both demonstrated moderate consistency with the pathological results (ME: kappa = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-0.68, P < 0.01; EUS: kappa = 0.46, 95%CI: 0.34-0.57, P < 0.01). ME was significantly more accurate in the diagnosis of high-grade intraepithelial (HGIN) or carcinoma in situ (odds ratio [OR] = 3.62, 95%CI: 1.43-9.16, P = 0.007) subgroups. Using a miniature probe rather than conventional EUS can improve the accuracy of lesion depth determination (82.3% vs 49.3%, P < 0.01). Less than a quarter of circumferential occupation and application of a miniature probe were independent risk factors for the accuracy of tumor invasion depth as assessed by EUS (< 1/4 circumferential occupation: OR = 3.07, 95%CI: 1.04-9.10; application of a miniature probe: OR = 5.28, 95%CI: 2.41-11.59, P < 0.01). Of the 41 lesions (41/152, 27.0%) that were misdiagnosed by ME, 24 were corrected by EUS (24/41, 58.5%). CONCLUSIONPreoperative diagnosis of SESCC should be conducted endoscopically using white light and magnification. In China, EUS can be added after obtaining patient consent. Use of a high-frequency miniature probe or miniature probe combined with conventional EUS is preferable.

Role of endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of patients with missed common bile duct stones

BACKGROUNDCholedocholithiasis develops in up to 20% of patients with gall bladder stones. The challenge in diagnosis usually occurs with small stones that may be missed by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is accurate in detecting common bile duct (CBD) stones missed by MRCP, especially the small ones or those impacted at the distal CBD or the papillary region. AIMTo evaluate the accuracy of EUS in detecting CBD stones missed by MRCP. METHODSPatients with an intermediate likelihood of choledocholithiasis according to ESGE guidelines and those with acute pancreatitis of undetermined cause were included. The presence of choledocholithiasis was evaluated by MRCP and EUS, and then results were confirmed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The sensitivity and specificity of EUS and MRCP were compared regarding the presence of stones, the size, and the number of detected stones. RESULTSNinety out of 100 involved patients had choledocholithiasis, while ten patients were excluded as they had pancreatic or gall bladder masses during EUS examination. In choledocholithiasis patients, the mean age was 52.37 ± 14.64 years, and 52.2% were males. Most patients had biliary obstruction (74.4%), while only 23 (25.6%) patients had unexplained pancreatitis. The overall prevalence of choledocholithiasis was 83.3% by EUS, 41.1% by MRCP, and 74.4% by ERCP. Also, the number and size of CBD stones could be detected accurately in 78.2% and 75.6% by EUS and 41.1% and 70.3% by MRCP, respectively. The sensitivity of EUS was higher than that of MRCP (98.51% vs 55.22%), and their predictive value was statistically different (P < 0.001). Combination of both tools raised the sensitivity to 97.22% and specificity to 100%. CONCLUSIONEUS could be a useful tool in assessing patients with suspected choledocholithiasis especially if combined with MRCP. However, its usefulness depends on its availability and the experience of the local centers.

Clinical Characteristics of Patients WithSurgically Resected Pancreatic Cysts: A Retrospective Analysis of 136 Patients.

To retrospectively analyze the characteristics of pancreatic cysts with respect to histopathological diagnosis and various diagnostic imaging tools. The clinical features of 136 patients and characteristics of histopathologically diagnosed cysts were retrospectively assessed. The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for pancreatic cysts was compared. Risk factors for high-grade dysplasia/invasive cancer in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) were also determined. The final analysis included 30 serous cystic neoplasms (SCNs) (21.6%), 13 mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) (9.4%), 65 IPMNs (46.8%), and 13 solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) (9.4%). The percentage of women with MCNs, SPNs, SCNs, and IPMNs was 100.0, 76.9, 73.3, and 47.7%, respectively (P < .001). The percentages of patients over 60 years of age with IPMNs, SCNs, MCNs, and SPNs were 73.9, 23.3, 0, and 0%, respectively (P < .001). The percentage of cysts located in the body and tail of the pancreas in MCNs, SCNs, SPNs, and IPMNs was 100, 70, 53.9, and 46.2%, respectively (P < .001). A unique honeycomb appearance was observed in 26.7% of SCNs. The overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS, CT, and MRI for pancreatic cysts was 82.6, 72.5, and 73.9%, respectively. Lesion size and presence of solid components were independent predictors of high-risk IPMNs. Patient characteristics and cyst features can help to differentiate pancreatic cyst types and identify high-risk IPMNs. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS for pancreatic cysts is superior to that of CT and MRI.

Cap-Assisted Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Effective Option

Introduction: The incidence of rectal neuroendocrine tumors (r-NETs) is increasing, and most small r-NETs can be treated endoscopically. The optimal endoscopic approach is still debatable. Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) leads to frequent incomplete resection. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows higher complete resection rates but is also associated with higher complication rates. According to some studies, cap-assisted EMR (EMR-C) is an effective and safe alternative for endoscopic resection of r-NETs. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EMR-C for r-NETs ≤10 mm without muscularis propria invasion or lymphovascular infiltration. Methods: Single-center prospective study including consecutive patients with r-NETs ≤10 mm without muscularis propria invasion or lymphovascular invasion confirmed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), submitted to EMR-C between January 2017 and September 2021. Demographic, endoscopic, histopathologic, and follow-up data were retrieved from medical records. Results: A total of 13 patients (male: 54%; n = 7) with a median age of 64 (interquartile range: 54–76) years were included. Most lesions were located at the lower rectum (69.2%, n = 9), and median lesion size was 6 (interquartile range: 4.5–7.5) mm. On EUS evaluation, 69.2% (n = 9) of tumors were limited to muscularis mucosa. EUS accuracy for the depth of invasion was 84.6%. We found a strong correlation between size measurements by histology and EUS (r = 0.83, p < 0.01). Overall, 15.4% (n = 2) were recurrent r-NETs and had been pretreated by conventional EMR. Resection was histologically complete in 92% (n = 12) of cases. Histologic analysis revealed grade 1 tumor in 76.9% (n = 10) of cases. Ki-67 index was inferior to 3% in 84.6% (n = 11) of cases. The median procedure time was 5 (interquartile range: 4–8) min. Only 1 case of intraprocedural bleeding was reported and was successfully controlled endoscopically. Follow-up was available in 92% (n = 12) of cases with a median follow-up of 6 (interquartile range: 12–24) months with no evidence of residual or recurrent lesion on endoscopic or EUS evaluation. Conclusion:EMR-C is fast, safe, and effective for resection of small r-NETs without high-risk features. EUS accurately assesses risk factors. Prospective comparative trials are needed to define the best endoscopic approach.

Application of endoscopic ultrasonography for detecting esophageal lesions based on convolutional neural network.

BACKGROUNDA convolutional neural network (CNN) is a deep learning algorithm based on the principle of human brain visual cortex processing and image recognition.AIMTo automatically identify the invasion depth and origin of esophageal lesions based on a CNN.METHODSA total of 1670 white-light images were used to train and validate the CNN system. The method proposed in this paper included the following two parts: (1) Location module, an object detection network, locating the classified main image feature regions of the image for subsequent classification tasks; and (2) Classification module, a traditional classification CNN, classifying the images cut out by the object detection network.RESULTSThe CNN system proposed in this study achieved an overall accuracy of 82.49%, sensitivity of 80.23%, and specificity of 90.56%. In this study, after follow-up pathology, 726 patients were compared for endoscopic pathology. The misdiagnosis rate of endoscopic diagnosis in the lesion invasion range was approximately 9.5%; 41 patients showed no lesion invasion to the muscularis propria, but 36 of them pathologically showed invasion to the superficial muscularis propria. The patients with invasion of the tunica adventitia were all treated by surgery with an accuracy rate of 100%. For the examination of submucosal lesions, the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was approximately 99.3%. Results of this study showed that EUS had a high accuracy rate for the origin of submucosal lesions, whereas the misdiagnosis rate was slightly high in the evaluation of the invasion scope of lesions. Misdiagnosis could be due to different operating and diagnostic levels of endoscopists, unclear ultrasound probes, and unclear lesions.CONCLUSIONThis study is the first to recognize esophageal EUS images through deep learning, which can automatically identify the invasion depth and lesion origin of submucosal tumors and classify such tumors, thereby achieving good accuracy. In future studies, this method can provide guidance and help to clinical endoscopists.

Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound with artificial intelligence for gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A meta-analysis.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are thought to have a malignant potential. However, utilizing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to differentiate GISTs from other types of subepithelial lesions (SELs) remains challenging. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based diagnostic systems for EUS have been reported to have a promising performance, although the results of the previous studies remain controversial. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based EUS in distinguishing GISTs from other SELs. A literature search was conducted on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify relevant articles. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of eligible studies were analyzed. Seven studies were eligible for the final analysis. The combined sensitivity and specificity of AI-based EUS were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.96) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.67-0.87), respectively. The overall diagnostic odds ratio of AI-based EUS for GISTs was 36.74 (95% CI 17.69-76.30) with an AUROC of 0.94. AI-based EUS showed high diagnostic ability and might help better differentiate GISTs from other SELs. More prospective studies on the diagnosis of GISTs using AI-based EUS are warranted in clinical setting.

Impact of endoscopic ultrasonography on the accuracy of T staging in esophageal cancer and factors associated with its accuracy: A retrospective study.

The sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for esophageal cancer are variable. The aim of the present study was to determine the accuracy of EUS for the T staging of esophageal cancer and to explore the factors that affect the accuracy.This was a retrospective study of patients with esophageal cancer who underwent EUS between January 2018 and September 2019 at the author's hospital. All patients underwent EUS, surgery, and pathological examination. The diagnostic value of ultrasound-based T (uT) staging was evaluated using the pathological T (pT) staging as the gold standard.Finally, 169 patients were included. Among the 169 patients, 37 were overstaged by EUS, 33 were understaged, and 99 were correctly staged. The overall accuracy of EUS was 58.6%. Sensitivity was low, at 0% to 70.8% depending upon the pT stage, but specificity was higher, at 71.0% to 100.0%, also depending upon the pT stage. The multivariable analysis revealed that highly differentiated tumors (odds ratio = 9.167, P = .041) and pT stage ≥T2 (odds ratio = 2.932, P = .004) were independent factors of accurate uT stage.The staging of esophageal cancer using EUS has low sensitivity but high specificity. Highly differentiated tumors and pT stage ≥2 tumors were associated with the accuracy of uT staging.

The Value of Gastric Cancer Staging by Endoscopic Ultrasonography Features in the Diagnosis of Gastroenterology.

This research was aimed at exploring the application value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the diagnosis of gastric cancer staging and the correlation between staging and clinical features of gastric cancer. A total of 72 patients with gastric cancer were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The patients in the pathological group underwent postoperative pathological examination, while those in the EUS group received preoperative EUS examination. The results showed that the staging accuracy of EUS was 73.33% for T1, 78.57% for T2, 27% for T3, and 100% for T4, compared with the pathological staging. The accuracy of N- and N+ was 42.5% and 82.3% in EUS, respectively, and the total accuracy was 55.7%. There was no considerable difference in the accuracy of T staging between early gastric cancer and advanced gastric cancer (P > 0.05), but there was a considerable difference in N staging (P < 0.05). Lymph node metastasis affected the accuracy of N staging (P < 0.05). The number and location of metastatic lymph nodes did not affect the judgment of metastatic lymph nodes (P > 0.05). In addition, the proportion of understaging and overstaging was greatly different among different lesion sizes and histological types of gastric cancer (P < 0.05). To sum up, the accuracy of EUS for T and N staging of gastric cancer needed to be improved. The location of gastric cancer lesions affected the accuracy of T staging, while the depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis affected the accuracy of N staging.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between linear EUS and miniprobe EUS for submucosal invasion in suspected cases of early gastric cancer.

This study assessed the accuracy of linear endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to diagnose submucosal (SM) invasion and compared linear EUS with mini-probe EUS in suspected early gastric cancer (EGC) patients. Patients diagnosed with biopsy-verified suspected EGC were analyzed retrospectively. All cases were examined by linear EUS or miniprobe EUS for preoperative diagnosis of invasion depth and underwent endoscopic or surgical treatment for radical resection. The invasion depth evaluated by EUS and pathology were categorized as no invasion of SM and invasion of SM or deeper. The diagnosis of EUS was compared with postoperative pathology results. A total of 105 patients were included in the final analysis. The overall prediction accuracy of linear EUS (n = 57) for SM invasion in suspected EGC was higher than that of mini-probe EUS (n = 48), although no statistically significant differences were noted (82.5% vs 72.9%, p = 0.344). The negative predictive value (NPV) of linear EUS was significantly higher than that of mini-probe EUS (100% vs 82.8%, p = 0.037). The binary logistic regression analysis showed that tumor size (p = 0.036), the presence of ulceration (p < 0.001) and EUS type (p = 0.027) were independent risk factors for the diagnosis of SM invasion by EUS. The area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) was 0.889 and 0.719 for linear and mini-probe EUS, respectively. Linear EUS diagnosed suspected EGC for SM invasion with a higher accuracy than mini-probe EUS. In addition, large and ulcerative lesions may lead to overestimation.

Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of computed tomography-negative common bile duct stone: Prospective randomized controlled trial.

For suspected common bile duct stone (CBDS) missed on computed tomography (CT), there is no clear evidence on whether endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is the better diagnostic tool. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of EUS and MRCP for cases of missed CBDS on CT. Patients suspected of having CBDS were enrolled and randomly allocated to the EUS or MRCP group. Upon the initial examination, those having CBDS or sludge formation underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), while those who were CBDS-negative underwent a second examination with either MRCP or EUS, which was distinct from the initial diagnostic procedure. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy, and the secondary outcomes were diagnostic ability, detection rate and characteristics of CBDS in the second examination, and the frequency of adverse events. Between April 2019 and January 2021, 50 patients were enrolled in the study. The accuracy was 92.3% for EUS and 68.4% for MRCP (P = 0.055). EUS showed 100% sensitivity, 88.2% specificity, 81.8% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value, and MRCP showed 33.3% sensitivity, 84.6% specificity, 50% positive predictive value, and 73.3% negative predictive value. The CBDS detection rate in the second examination was 0% for MRCP after a negative EUS and 35.7% for EUS after a negative MRCP (P = 0.041). No adverse events occurred in any of the patients. Endoscopic ultrasound may be a superior diagnostic tool compared to MRCP for the detection of CBDS that are undetected on CT. (UMIN000036357).

Diagnostic Efficacy and Decision-Making Role of Preoperative Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Early Gastric Cancer.

Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most commonly used method for T staging of early gastric cancer (EGC). However, the studies pertaining to EUS for staging EGC reported widely varied sensitivities and specificities. This study aimed to estimate the overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS for staging the depth of EGCs and to explore the influential factors.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 208 consecutive patients with EGC, and all patients underwent EUS for estimating tumor invasion depth, followed by either curative surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The diagnostic accuracy of EUS was evaluated by comparing the final histologic results of resected specimens. The correlation between accuracy of EUS and characteristics of EGC lesion was analyzed.Results: A total of 211 EGC lesions in 208 patients were included. The overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS in assessing the tumor invasion depth of EGC was 55.9%. Multivariate analysis showed that submucosal invasion (OR 2.615; 95% CI 1.203–5.684, P = 0.015) was independently associated with misdiagnosis of the depth of EGC and 0-III type lesions (OR 31.495; 95% CI 2.083–476.256, P = 0.013) were an independent risk factor for over-diagnosis of invasion depth by EUS. However, EUS was only suitable for lesions within absolute indications for endoscopic resection.Conclusions: The overall accuracy of EUS in diagnosing invasion depth of EGC was relatively low. Thus, EUS is not necessary routinely for determining the therapeutic strategy for EGC.

Role of endoscopic ultrasonography for differential diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions

ObjectiveTo determine the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions (SMLs).MethodsThis was a retrospective study involving patients diagnosed with SMLs using EUS and confirmed by histopathology from November 2014 to December 2020 at The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University.ResultsA total of 231 patients with SMLs were examined by EUS. Histologically, 107 lesions were stromal tumors, and 75 lesions were leiomyomas. Stromal tumors were mainly located in the stomach (89.7%), and leiomyomas were predominantly seen in the esophagus (69.3%). The diagnostic accuracy of EUS for stromal tumors and leiomyomas was 80.4% and 68.0%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was highest for lesions located in the muscularis mucosa. The mean diameter of stromal tumors measured using EUS was significantly larger than that of leiomyomas (21.89 mm vs. 12.35 mm, p < 0.001). Stromal tumors and leiomyomas originated mainly from the muscularis propria (94.4%) and the muscularis mucosa (56.0%), respectively. Compared with the very low-risk and low-risk groups of stromal tumors according to the National Institute of Health guidelines, the intermediate-risk and high-risk groups were more likely to have a lesion > 3 cm (p < 0.001) and a surface ulcer (p < 0.01) identified by EUS.ConclusionsEUS has good diagnostic value for the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal SMLs based on the lesion size and the muscle layer of origin. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS lesions is related to the origin, and the diagnostic accuracy is greatest in the mucosal muscularis layer. Stromal tumors > 3 cm and a surface ulcer on EUS are likely to be intermediate or high risk for invasion.

The diagnostic role of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions

Aim: To reveal the malignancy rates of pancreatic cyctic lesions and success rates of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in differentiating between malignant vs non-malignant cystic lesions of the pancreas. Methods: In this study, 138 patients were included. CT, MRI, EUS and pathology reports of the related patients were scrutinised and descriptive statistical methods were used. Sensitivity and specificity values of CT, MRI and EUS were calculated by taking the postoperative histopathology results as the gold standard. Results: In assessment the data of patients with neoplastic or non-neoplastic pancreatic cysts, the highest sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy in the malignant-benign distinction of the lesions was determined in CT. Although EUS had similar sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy rates as CT, its specificity was considered to be lower than CT. MRI had lower sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy rates compared to both of modalities (EUS and CT). The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of EUS guided FNA biopsies were found to be quite low than other diagnostic modalities. Conclusion: While CT and EUS showed high correlation with each other in terms of overall diagnostic compliance, there was a moderate correlation between MRI and EUS.

The New American Joint Committee on Cancer T staging system for stomach: increased complexity without clear improvement in predictive accuracy for endoscopic ultrasound

BackgroundThe efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for determining the T category of gastric cancer is variable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the superiority of EUS by using the 6th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for stomach cancer compared to the new 7th/8th edition.MethodsA retrospective analysis of clinical and EUS imaging features of 348 gastric carcinoma patients who underwent radical resection were retrospectively analyzed. Differences between the 6th and 7th/8th edition T staging systems for preoperative EUS evaluation were compared.ResultsThe accuracy of EUS T staging was 72.4% for the 7th/8th edition and 78.4% for the 6th edition. T3 stage accuracy was significantly worse when the T3 group status was changed. The tumor location, echoendoscope type, and histological type were associated with inaccuracy. We further analyzed the EUS image features for each tumor T stage and found that an indistinctly visible muscularis propria (MP) or with obvious thickening was considered an indicator of lesions involved in the MP with a sensitivity of 81.3%; an MP completely disappeared and accompanied with a serosal layer intact may be a marker that the lesion invaded to the subserosa. We also found that irregularities in the outer edge of the gastric wall were markers of gastric serosal layer penetration with a positive predictive value of 92.2%.ConclusionsThe increased complexity of the 7th/8th edition T staging system is accompanied by worsening of the predictive accuracy for EUS as compared to the 6th edition. Furthermore, the tumor location, echoendoscope type, histological type, and EUS image features for each tumor T stage should warrant attention.

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY IN RESECABLE ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Abstract INTRODUCTION In localized oesophageal cancer (EC), a correct clinical tumor staging is essential in order to offer an optimal treatment, although often challenging. The aim of this work is to assess the accuracy of the diagnostic tests by comparing them with the pathological staging. MATERIAL AND METHODS Retrospective observational study of patients who underwent oesophagectomy for cancer in a referral hospital between January 2003 and September 2019. Those patients who received neoadjuvant treatment were excluded in order to avoid bias from dowstaging effects. The preoperative stage cT and cN as well as the combination of both (cTNM) were compared with the pathological stage of the surgical specimen (pT, pN, pTNM), considered the gold standard. Computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) were evaluated for cT and cN, while Positron emission tomography (PET/CT) only for cN. Furthermore, the pT stage was correlated with the tumor length described in the oesophagogram (EG). RESULTS Among the 63 patients included, the clinical staging was correct in 16 cases (global accuracy 25.4%), it was overstaged in 21 (33.2%) and understaged in 26 (41.3%). For cT staging, the accuracy of EUS was higher than that of CT (46.6% and 34.9% respectively), specially for early stages. EG tumor length correlated with pT stage (p &amp;lt; 0.05). For cN staging, PET/CT had the highest sensitivity (50.0%) and NPV (75.0%). CONCLUSIONS Despite the multiple diagnostic tools used, the global accuracy of clinical staging in localized EC is still a challenge, with the therapeutic and prognostic implications that this entails.

Examination of Endoscopic Ultrasonographic Diagnosis for the Depth of Early Gastric Cancer

BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is one of the helpful tools to diagnose depth of early gastric cancer (EGC). In this study, we examined efficiencies of EUS for EGC such as overall accuracy, risk factors of over/under-staging, and accuracies of each invasive distance.MethodsA total of 403 EGC lesions that could be investigated by EUS during pre-operation and histological diagnosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or surgery were enrolled in this study. For the 403 cases, we analyzed the accuracies of depth by conventional endoscopy (CE) and EUS retrospectively. We evaluated the clinical survey items of CE and EUS which will be described later to compare the differences between “accuracy group” and “over-staging group”, and between “accuracy group” and “under-staging group”, retrospectively. Additionally, 78 EGC lesions which were confined to the submucosa and for which it was possible to measure accurate invasive distance from the muscularis mucosae were examined for the relationship between preoperative diagnosis of depth by CE and EUS and invasive distance retrospectively.ResultsThe overall accuracies of both CE and EUS in predicting EGC invasion depth were 87.3%. For CE staging, histological classification was the factor which influenced over-staging. Gastric regions and tumor area were the factors which influenced under-staging of CE. For EUS staging, tumor area was the factor which influenced over-staging, and gastric regions were the factors which influenced under-staging. Both CE and EUS were not sufficient for predicting the lesions confined to < 500 µm from the muscularis mucosae because the accuracies of both in predicting depth were less than 50%. However, EUS has a higher accuracy than CE for the lesions confined to 500 - 2,000 µm.ConclusionsThe overall accuracies of both CE and EUS in predicting EGC invasion depth were equal, but the contributing factors for over/under-staging were different. Both CE and EUS are not sufficient at present to predict the lesions confined to < 500 µm from the muscularis mucosae. However, the accuracy of EUS in predicting them may increase if high-performance EUS systems are developed in the future.

Comparative study between endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosis of biliary obstruction

Introduction Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a diagnostic procedure that continues to have greater clinical applications. EUS performed before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with obstructive jaundice can reduce morbidity and mortality. Aim This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of both EUS and ERCP as combined or individual procedures in 30 patients diagnosed with biliary obstruction. Patients and methods From January 2017 to December 2019 in Al Azhar University Hospitals in Cairo, we recruited 30 patients with obstructive jaundice. All the patients underwent clinical examination, laboratory investigations, and abdominal US followed by EUS and ERCP procedures at the same session, and EUS findings were compared with that of ERCP. Results The diagnostic accuracy of EUS was as follows: choledocholithiasis in 92%, and malignant lesions in 95%. EUS showed pathology in 47.3% of patients who had an unknown pathology in biliary system at initial investigations. The overall diagnostic performance of EUS shows that the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 90.9, 89, 91.7, 95, and 93.5%, respectively. Regarding common bile duct stone (s), by ERCP, it was present in 13 (43.3%) cases, whereas by EUS, it was present in 12 (40%) cases. Regarding malignant lesions (ampullary tumor, cholangiocarcinoma, and pancreatic tumor), by ERCP, they were present in four (13.3%), seven (23.3%), three (10%) cases, respectively, whereas by EUS, they were present in five (16.6), six (20%), and five (16.6) cases, respectively. The complication rate was 3.3%. Conclusions EUS established high diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing the causes of obstructive jaundice, with no statistically significant difference between ERCP and EUS findings. This accurately guided ERCP need and avoided needless ERCP. EUS and ERCP in a single session for treatment of obstructive jaundice is scientifically valuable.

Staging esophageal cancer: low EUS accuracy in t2n0 patients.

Background and study aims Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide. Staging of EC is performed with computed tomography (CT), positron-emission tomography (PET), and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Patient management mostly depends on lymph node status. Compared to histopathology, the accuracy of EUS for T and N parameters is about 85 % and 75 %, respectively. Errors in staging may change prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess the role of EUS in T2-N0 EC considering the experience of two high-volume digestive endoscopic centers. Methods Two prospectively collected databases were queried to identify all patients with EC, staged as cT2N0 by EUS, with no distant metastases at CT/PET scan and who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. Preoperative EUS staging (cTNM) was compared to histopathology of the surgical specimen (pTNM) to evaluate accuracy. Results Of 729 consecutive patients with EC between January 2011 and September 2018, 72 (49 men) had cT2N0 disease. CT and PET scans confirmed the absence of distant metastasis. In 43 of 72 patients (60 %), the evaluation was correct, 23 of 72 (31,7 %) were understaged, and six of 72 patients (8,3 %) were overstaged. Among the understaged patients, eight were understaged by tumor depth (35 %), seven by nodal involvement (30 %), and eight by both (35 %). All six patients who were overstaged had T1b-N0 disease. EUS accuracy was 77 % in staging for tumor depth and 82 % in staging for nodal metastases. The positive predictive value (PPV) for cT2N0 EC was 60 % (43 pT2N0 /72 cT2N). Conclusions The accuracy of EUS staging of T2N0 EC is low, with only 60 % of patients undergoing appropriate therapy based on histopathology.

Endoscopic ultrasonography findings of pancreatic parenchyma for predicting subtypes of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

Background and aimsThe subtypes of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are closely associated with the clinicopathological behavior and recurrence after surgical resection. However, there are no established non-invasive methods to confirm the subtypes of IPMNs without surgery. The aim of this study is to predict the subtypes of IPMNs using the findings of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). MethodsSixty-two consecutive patients with IPMNs who underwent EUS before surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The following EUS findings were analyzed and their relationship with the subtypes was evaluated: diameter of the main pancreatic duct, cyst size, number of cysts, height of mural nodule, early chronic pancreatitis (CP) finding, fatty parenchyma and atrophic parenchyma. ResultsThe subtypes of IPMNs were as follows: gastric (G)-type 38 (61%), intestinal (I) -type 14 (23%) and pancreatobiliary (PB) -type 10 (16%). Fatty parenchyma was significantly associated with G-type (P < 0.0001). Early CP findings ≥2 and atrophic parenchyma were significantly correlated with I-type (P < 0.0001). PB-type was significantly associated with pancreatic parenchyma without early CP findings or fatty degeneration in comparison to the other subtypes (P < 0.0001). Using the above characteristic EUS findings, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were as follows: 63%, 92% and 74%, respectively, in G-type, 57%, 96% and 87% in I-type, and 90%, 94% and 94% in PB-type. ConclusionsThe evaluation of EUS findings, especially focused on the pancreatic parenchyma, has the potential to predict the subtypes of IPMN.

Etiological Diagnosis of Linear-Array Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Distal Common Bile Duct Dilatation.

The etiology of distal common bile duct (CBD) dilatation is complex. Linear-array endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) can not only visualize the distal and surrounding structures of the bile duct closely but also obtain pathological specimens by fine-needle aspiration, which provides an important basis for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of linear-array EUS in the etiology of distal CBD dilatation. Patients with distal CBD dilatation underwent linear-array EUS in the endoscopic center of The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Kunshan were collected from January 2015 to June 2019. The pathology results after surgery, endoscopic pathology, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) results were retrospectively analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy of linear-array EUS and CT or MRI was compared. For the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis, the diagnostic accuracy of linear-array EUS was 97.5%, which was significantly higher than that of MRI (86.36%) and CT (89.74) (P < 0.001 and 0.006, respectively). The diagnostic accuracy of linear-array EUS for periampullary tumors was 93.75%, which was higher than MRI and CT with an accuracy of 82.73% and 80.34% (P = 0.004 and 0.001, respectively). Linear EUS was effective for the etiological diagnosis of distal CBD dilatation.