Diagnosis Of Abusive Head Trauma Research Articles

Neurological symptoms in pediatric abusive head trauma: Multi-center data for clinical forensic medicine

Central nervous system-associated lesions can frequently be found in abusive head trauma (AHT) cases. Since there are frequently no visible signs of injury on the body surface, the diagnosis of AHT can be challenging. In particular, if the affected child shows only isolated neurological symptoms, these are often misinterpreted as a minor illness. Using a retrospective study design at three university hospitals, 72 medico-legal cases of “shaken baby syndrome” – a common variant of AHT – were analyzed. A comparison between confession cases (n=15) and non-confession cases was used in order to reduce the risk of circular reasoning. The most common neurological symptoms in the present cases were: epileptic seizures (44 %), pallor (37 %), somnolence (31 %), reduced muscle tone (25 %), vomiting (20 %) and unconsciousness (15 %). There were also no statistically significant differences between confession and non-confession cases, nor when comparing the simultaneous presence of skin or skeletal lesions. The combination of several symptoms serves as an indicator for the presence of AHT and should lead to further diagnostic measures under the hypothesis of the presence of an AHT in clinical observation.

Prosecuting cases of abusive head trauma in Switzerland: a descriptive study of the impact of medical documentation and delay of reporting on judicial outcome

Abusive head trauma (AHT) is a criminal offence that is prosecuted ex officio, following report to the police from physicians or child protection services. The aim of this study was to assess whether the judicial outcome (dismissal vs indictment) was influenced by the quality of the medical documentation and/or the time span between AHT diagnosis and reporting child abuse to the police. The cohort was divided in two groups: 13/23 dismissals (57%) and 10/23 indictments (43%). The diagnostic probability of the AHT cases was certain for both groups. Nonetheless, in fraction of dismissed cases, alternative explanations for the observed lesions seemed plausible to the public prosecutor. Legal files of only 3/12 dismissed cases had a forensic report, while 6/10 cases that were indicted included a forensic report. Further, the legal file of several dismissed cases entirely lacked medical documentation (3/12), which was not the cases for indicted cases. The period between AHT diagnosis and reporting to the police was not different for dismissals (29 ± 19 days) and indictments (7 ± 4 days) (p = 0.32). Physicians filed reports more rapidly (6 ± 1 days) compared to childhood protection service (70 ± 46 days) (p = 0.01) and that may increase the rate of indictments (9/18) compared to reporting via the childhood protection service (1/5). Despite diagnostic certainty, other causes for the lesions were considered as plausible alternative explanations to judicial professionals in several dismissed cases. These seemed to have less medical documentation and forensic evaluations. In addition, more rapid reporting to the police by physicians seems to increase the likelihood of indictments.

How Antiscience Creates Confusion About the Diagnosis of Abusive Head Trauma

This Viewpoint exposes the antiscience and misinformation used to generate skepticism about abusive head trauma in young children, putting this vulnerable population at risk.

Clinical and Forensic Investigation Protocols for Diagnosing Abusive Head Trauma: A Literature Review.

Abusive head trauma (AHT) represents a very serious global public health problem. Prevention of these episodes is essential to reduce the morbidity and mortality of this phenomenon. All healthcare professionals should be able to recognize the signs of abuse. However, diagnosis is very complex as the signs are often blurred and cannot be recognized with certainty without carrying out adequate instrumental investigations. It has been calculated that approximately one-third of AHT cases remain undetected and require more than one medical visit to be correctly interpreted and diagnosed. On the other hand, the literature has recently also emphasized the problems related to possible false diagnoses of abuse and the numerous family and personal repercussions that follow from this issue. For these reasons, correct and timely recognition is essential to avoid the risk of recurrence of AHT and to start proper forensic investigations, in order to identify the offender or exonerate a suspect. The present work explores the most recent evidence of recent years in the field of AHT diagnostics through a literature review. The purpose of this article is to provide forensic pathologists with clear tools for diagnosis based on the literature. To this end, the review suggests clinical and forensic protocols aimed at the timely diagnosis of AHT in order to prevent abuse from remaining undetected.

Retinal hemorrhages due to intracranial hypertension, is it possible to differentiate them from those associated with abuse?

BackgroundRetinal hemorrhages (RHs) are suggestive of abusive head trauma (AHT). Even so, controversy persists about other possible causes, a fact that hinders the diagnosis of abuse. ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence and patterns of RHs associated with increased intracranial pressure (ICP) in young children. Participants and methodsProspective, single center study of children aged 29 days-3 years undergoing a lumbar puncture with opening pressure (OP) measured during routine clinical care in the emergency department, over a 4-year period. Children with known causes of RHs were excluded. All the children underwent a detailed ophthalmological examination within 72 h of admission. For children with RHs, an in-depth investigation was carried out to rule out AHT. ResultsThirty-four patients were included: 20(58.8 %) were boys, median age 11.7 months (range 1-33 months). Overall, 29(85.3 %) had clinical findings of increased ICP. The duration of symptoms was ≤4 days in all patients except one, in whom it was 1.5 months. The median OP was 27cmH2O (range 20-60cmH2O). One of the children was found to have RHs, with evaluation resulting in a diagnosis of AHT. No RHs were found in any of the others studied. Using the Wilson method, we can be confident to an upper limit of 95 % that the probability of RHs occurring secondary to increased ICP alone is at most 0.1. ConclusionsRHs were not detected in patients with isolated nontraumatic increased ICP, measured via OP and diagnosed in the ED. Therefore, if RHs are detected, investigation into the possibility of AHT is warranted.

Heads above the parapet: abusive head trauma and the legal system, appealing to reason

Because of its translation to the courtroom the diagnosis of abusive head trauma (AHT) has been subjected to a high level of scrutiny and has been associated with controversy in legal circles and the public media. The narrative that AHT is an unreliable medical diagnosis with a poor evidence base underpinning it (‘junk science’) that has resulted in children being wrongfully removed and parents wrongfully convicted is advanced by a small group of alternative theorists. There is evidence that the rate of successful appeal against criminal convictions in relation to AHT in the USA is rising and this can be related in part to the provision of expert defense testimony, some of which is based on methodologically flawed or deliberately misleading academic material.

Abusive head injury in the very young: outcomes from a Singapore children's hospital.

Abusive head trauma (AHT) is a serious problem in children. The aims of this study are to identify risk factors that correlate with outcomes for those requiring neurosurgical intervention for very young children with AHT, assessment of variables associated with outcomes, and corroboration of our results with literature. This is an ethics-approved, retrospective study. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients aged 2years old or less with a diagnosis of AHT managed by the Neurosurgical Service, KK Women's and Children's Hospital. Demographical and clinical variables are incorporated in the statistical analyses. Logistic regression was applied to statistically significant variables for the risk prediction model. From 2000 to 2020, 24 patients required surgery for AHT. Timepoint was set at 12months post-diagnosis. Univariate analyses demonstrated that patients with mild TBI were likely to have a favourable GOS-E Peds (p = 0.01), whereas radiological presence of cerebral oedema (p < .001), development of scar epilepsy (p = 0.021), and progression to cerebral palsy (p = 0.001) were associated with unfavourable GOS-E Peds. This is the first study focused on neurosurgical outcomes for very young children with AHT in Singapore. We advocate multidisciplinary efforts to improve outcomes for this devastating condition.

Diagnosis of Abusive Head Trauma : Neurosurgical Perspective.

Abusive head trauma (AHT) is the most severe form of physical abuse in children. Such injury involves traumatic damage to the head and/or spine of infants and young children. The term AHT was introduced to include a wider range of injury mechanisms, such as intentional direct blow, throw, and even penetrating trauma by perpetuator(s). Currently, it is recommended to replace the former term, shaken baby syndrome, which implicates shaking as the only mechanism, with AHT to include diverse clinical and radiological manifestations. The consequences of AHT cause devastating medical, social and financial burdens on families, communities, and victims. The potential harm of AHT to the developing brain and spinal cord of the victims is tremendous. Many studies have reported that the adverse effects of AHT are various and serious, such as blindness, mental retardation, physical limitation of daily activities and even psychological problems. Therefore, appropriate vigilance for the early recognition and diagnosis of AHT is highly recommended to stop and prevent further injuries. The aim of this review is to summarize the relevant evidence concerning the early recognition and diagnosis of AHT. To recognize this severe type of child abuse early, all health care providers maintain a high index of suspicion and vigilance. Such suspicion can be initiated with careful and thorough history taking and physical examinations. Previously developed clinical prediction rules can be helpful for decision-making regarding starting an investigation when considering meaningful findings. Even the combination of biochemical markers may be useful to predict AHT. For a more confirmative evaluation, neuroradiological imaging is required to find AHT-specific findings. Moreover, timely consultation with ophthalmologists is needed to find a very specific finding, retinal hemorrhage.

Whole-Spine MRI in Children With Suspected Abusive Head Trauma.

BACKGROUND. Abusive head trauma (AHT) in children has recently been associated with findings on cervical spine MRI. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether whole-spine MRI in children with suspected AHT shows additional abnormalities not identified on cervical spine MRI. METHODS. This retrospective study included 256 children younger than 3 years old (170 boys, 86 girls; mean age, 5.9 months) who underwent skeletal survey and head MRI for suspected child abuse from January 2019 to December 2020. Per institutional protocol, children with suspected AHT also underwent whole-spine MRI. AHT diagnoses were established by a combination of clinical information from medical record review and injuries described in reports from skeletal survey, head MRI, and head CT (if performed). Two pediatric neuroradiologists independently reviewed whole-spine MRI examinations for presence and level of intraspinal hemorrhage (classified as subarachnoid, subdural, or epidural), ligamentous injury, spinal cord edema, and vertebral fractures; subdural hematoma, epidural hematoma, ligamentous injury, and fracture unidentified by skeletal survey were considered major findings. Interobserver agreement was assessed; a third radiologist resolved discrepancies. Findings were summarized with attention to injuries isolated to the thoracolumbar spine. RESULTS. A total of 148 of 256 (57.8%) children underwent whole-spine MRI. AHT was diagnosed in 79 of 148 (53.4%) children who underwent whole-spine MRI versus in 2 of 108 (1.9%) who did not undergo whole-spine MRI (p < .001). Interobserver agreement, expressed as kappa coefficient, was 0.90 for intraspinal hemorrhage, 0.69 for ligamentous injury, 0.66 for spinal cord edema, and 0.95 for fracture. A total of 57 of 148 (38.5%) whole-spine MRI examinations showed injuries, and 34 of 148 (23.0%) showed injuries localized to the thoracolumbar spine. A total of 47 of 148 (31.8%) whole-spine MRI examinations showed major findings, of which 24 (51.1%) were localized to the thoracolumbar spine. Isolated thoracolumbar injuries included 23 of 34 spinal subdural hematomas, 2 of 3 spinal epidural hematomas, and 9 of 11 vertebral fractures, including five fractures not identified by skeletal survey. Diagnosis of AHT was more common in children with positive, versus negative, whole-spine MRI examinations (76.8% vs 39.1%; p < .001). CONCLUSION. In children with suspected AHT, whole-spine MRI commonly shows isolated thoracolumbar injuries. CLINICAL IMPACT. The results support performing whole-spine MRI rather than cervical spine MRI in children with suspected AHT.

The role of retinal imaging in the management of abusive head trauma cases.

As retinal hemorrhage (RH) is the most frequent and reliable finding of abusive head trauma (AHT), an ophthalmology consultation should be systematically required in suspected cases. Full retinal examination through pharmacologically dilated pupil can detect the type and pattern of RHs, helping to distinguish abusive from non-abusive head trauma. We performed a retrospective analysis of a case series of 6 infants (aged 0.6-10 months) with AHT who were admitted to the Emergency Department of Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS in Rome with severe intracranial hemorrhages. Children underwent full multidisciplinary assessment including dilated fundus examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and digital wide-field fundus photography (DWFFP - in our case RetCam). In our paper we report the clinical presentation, the ocular findings and outcome at discharge. The mean age at the hospital admission was 6.28 months. In all infants, intracranial hemorrhages were found. Preretinal and intraretinal hemorrhages were detected, collecting good-quality retinal images. Imaging of retinal hemorrhages represents a fundamental moment of AHT diagnosis and documentation. Although RetCam is the gold standard for the acquisition of retinal images in suspected cases, OCT is extremely valuable in forensic evaluation since it can detect even small macular hemorrhages. Therefore, the combination of RetCam and OCT imaging can give relevant hints for the diagnosis of AHT, allowing to evaluate the extent, spread and morphology of RHs.

A National Analysis of Ophthalmic Features and Mortality in Abusive Head Trauma

It is important to recognize presenting features and factors associated with mortality in abusive head trauma (AHT) owing to the severity of the diagnosis and the necessity for prompt action. To describe the prevalence and economic burden of AHT and identify factors associated with mortality. This retrospective, cross-sectional study used the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample database to identify all emergency department visits in the US for patients younger than 5 years with a primary diagnosis of abusive head trauma between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2018. This study was conducted in 2021. Prevalence, demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, mortality, and economic burden associated with AHT. Weighted national estimates were calculated using sampling weights provided in the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample database. From 2006 to 2018, there were an estimated 12 287 cases of emergency department visits in the US for patients younger than 5 years with a primary diagnosis of AHT. The estimated number of AHT cases decreased by 672 (95% CI, 403-940; P < .001) from 2006 to 2018. The incidence decreased by 6.7% each year (incidence rate ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.93-0.94; P < .001) between 2006 and 2018. During the course of a hospital visit, 646 patients (5.3%) died. The majority of patients with a diagnosis of AHT were younger than 1 year (n = 7046; 57.3%), were male (n = 7268; 59.2%) and had Medicaid insurance (n = 8585; 70.0%). After controlling for demographic characteristics, factors associated with increased mortality were age greater than 1 year (odds ratio [OR], 2.45; 95% CI, 1.50-3.99; P < .001), first or second income quartile (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.08-2.91; P = .02), midwestern United States (OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.04-4.00; P = .04), level 1 trauma center (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.07-6.75; P = .04), orbital fracture (OR, 15.38; 95% CI, 2.41-98.18; P = .004), cerebral edema (OR, 8.49; 95% CI, 5.57-12.93; P < .001), intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.71-10.67; P = .002), hypoxic ischemic brain injury (OR, 4.16; 95% CI, 2.13-8.10; P < .001), skull fractures (OR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.76-5.82; P < .001), subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.22-4.83; P = .01), retinal hemorrhage (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.40-3.38; P < .001), and subdural hemorrhage (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.05-3.98; P = .04). This study's findings suggest that health care disparities may be present in the treatment of AHT. Recognizing factors suggested in this investigation to be associated with higher mortality, public health efforts should be targeted toward low-income areas and in the midwestern United States.

The role of household composition of children diagnosed with abusive head trauma

BackgroundTo prevent abusive head trauma (AHT), many studies focus on understanding the risk factors. Few studies assess the role of household composition. ObjectiveTo describe the household composition of children diagnosed with AHT and assess the relationships between patient and household characteristics, perpetration, and fatality. Participants and settingChildren admitted to a large pediatric hospital with AHT between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019. MethodsThe diagnosis of AHT was made at initial hospitalization by a child abuse pediatrician with a multidisciplinary team review. The electronic medical records of identified patients were reviewed to identify demographic information, the number and ages of all of their siblings and the number and relationship to patients of all adults who were reported as being present at the time of AHT and therefore considered to be possible perpetrators. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample. Comparisons were made using Fisher exact tests and Mann-Whitney tests. ResultsChildren with AHT who were under 12 months of age and had siblings in the home, particularly siblings under age 5, had greater odds of being injured by a biological parent.Children 12 months or older and children without siblings had greater odds of being injured by a boyfriend or girlfriend of their parent or guardian. ConclusionsIn cases of AHT, the possible perpetrator differed based on the presence of young siblings living in the home, which has important implications for AHT prevention.

Fragilità genitoriali e danni ai bambini: un caso di abusive head trauma

The diagnosis of Abusive Head Trauma (AHT) is often difficult to formulate due to the non-specificity of the clinical presentation and the difficulty in the anamnestic review of the traumatic event that leads the patient to be evaluated by the PS pediatrician. An accurate clinical evaluation, the support of blood chemistry and instrumental tests and the recognition of environmental risk factors in the family context could be able to exclude other conditions. The prognostic sequelae vary greatly and can lead to permanent outcomes and death.

Early Diagnosis of Abusive Head Trauma to Avoid Repetitive Shaking Events.

Early Diagnosis of Abusive Head Trauma to Avoid Repetitive Shaking Events.

Abusive Head Trauma

Abusive head trauma(AHT) is a leading cause of severe traumatic brain injury in children under 2 years old. Patients with AHT present with various clinical features, including acute subdural hematoma, retinal hemorrhage, and extensive hemispheric hypodensity, which has recently been reproduced in a basic experimental model. Despite multidisciplinary treatment, the outcome is poor, and neurological sequelae often remain. However, functional recovery seems possible with aggressive rehabilitation. The medical rationale for the diagnosis of AHT has a significant impact on the judicial decision-making process to determine evidence of child abuse, enabling collaboration with the police, prosecutors, and other investigative agencies, including lawyers. In Japan, infantile acute subdural hematoma(hematoma type I)is a clinical form of hematoma that often occurs after 6-10 months, when the child is able to walk. It is accompanied by backward fall, sudden loss of consciousness, pallor, spastic paralysis of the extremities, and retinal hemorrhage. A nationwide survey of infant acute subdural hematoma due to minor injury is currently being planned, and it is hoped that this would be comprehensive in Japan. Medical personnel involved in neurosurgical emergencies have an important responsibility as a safety network for pediatric care and are expected to play a central role in the diagnosis of AHT through collaboration with many specialized departments.

Re-evaluation of abusive head trauma in Norway appears flawed.

A review by Wester et al in Acta Paediatrica presented 17 adjudicated cases of Norwegian infants with abusive head trauma (AHT).(1) Their interpretation of the medical findings identified alternative diagnoses for 16 of the 17 children and suggested that the injuries were not inflicted and may have been the result of spontaneously occurring events. The authors stated that eight children had clinical and radiological characteristics consistent with external hydrocephalus, complicated by chronic subdural haematoma, and that six had findings compatible with hypoxic-ischaemic insults. Fractures were attributed to prematurity and sequelae from birth trauma. If their interpretations are correct, this study calls for a thorough review of how the medical community, forensic experts and the courts manage AHT cases. However, there are several elements of concern in the Wester et al study that we believe need clarification before a conclusion can be reached.

Retinal hemorrhage patterns: a new paradigm

The current paradigm for interpretation of retinal hemorrhages (RH) focuses on diagnosis of abusive head trauma based on severity of RH, for which classifications have been published. While RH severity has value, there is overlap in severity between accidental and abusive injuries, some patterns are diagnostic even if RH are not severe, and medical diagnoses are not addressed. We sought to develop a new paradigm for RH interpretation using patterns that distinguish medical from traumatic causes of RH.

Unsubstantiated belief in the diagnostic accuracy of the triad of abusive head trauma may lead to incorrect diagnoses of alleged abuse cases.

Unsubstantiated belief in the diagnostic accuracy of the triad of abusive head trauma may lead to incorrect diagnoses of alleged abuse cases.

Abusive head trauma: neuroimaging mimics and diagnostic complexities.

Traumatic brain injury is responsible for approximately half of all childhood deaths from infancy to puberty, the majority of which are attributable to abusive head trauma (AHT). Due to the broad way patients present and the lack of a clear mechanism of injury in some cases, neuroimaging plays an integral role in the diagnostic pathway of these children. However, this nonspecific nature also presages the existence of numerous conditions that mimic both the clinical and neuroimaging findings seen in AHT. This propensity for misdiagnosis is compounded by the lack of pathognomonic patterns and clear diagnostic criteria. The repercussions of this are severe and have a profound stigmatic effect. The authors present an exhaustive review of the literature complemented by illustrative cases from their institutions with the aim of providing a framework with which to approach the neuroimaging and diagnosis of AHT.

The impact of the consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children.

It seems paradoxical that facts, data and science are still considered controversial despite the harrowing death of a multitude of people from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an unparalleled health care crisis of our lifetime. In addition, while scientists are desperately attempting to produce a vaccine for COVID-19, a large segment of the populace still believes in conspiracies related to vaccines. Therefore, it is not surprising that the diagnosis of abusive head trauma (AHT) faces similar challenges — the difference being that AHT challenges are mostly in the realms of law courts rather than actual clinical management of these infants. Against this backdrop, the Child Abuse Imaging Committee of the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) collaborated with other leading experts to develop the consensus statement on AHT. This consensus statement has had a significant impact since its publication. It is now endorsed by 17 multinational, multidisciplinary organizations. The consensus statement has helped educate the diverse stakeholders of AHT and has helped further our understanding of AHT and the issues related to it. This could serve as the template for developing future consensus documents.