Atrial fibrillation (AF) is by far the most common cause of stroke with cardiovascular etiology. It is commonly believed that a significant proportion of ischemic strokes of an unknown cause are in fact also embolic (ESUS). This leads to consideration that patients after ESUS are potential candidates for chronic NOAC treatment. However, the therapeutic strategy constructed in such a simple way has been verified negatively in recent randomized trials. It is uncertain whether the pharmaceutical industry will be interested in continuing research in a subpopulation of ESUS patients with a particularly high risk of AF. However, it is now possible to strive for extended ECG monitoring aimed at detecting paroxysmal AF that is not detected by standard post-stroke diagnostic workup. In both scenarios, pragmatic and economic considerations make it necessary to develop a method of proper patients selection. The discussed analysis of data collected during the CRYSTAL-AF study, discussed by me, allows to better understand the imperfection of the current thinking about ESUS and provides information that may development the creation of an optimal model for dealing with this group of patients.
Read full abstract