Objective: To assess the anatomic relationship of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA)/inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) with ureter by contrast-enhanced abdominal pelvic CT, in order to provide guidance for vascular management and ureteral protection in laparoscopic rectal surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Image data of contrast-enhanced abdominal pelvic CT at Department of Medical Radiography of Peking University First Hospital in November 2018 were enrolled. Exclusion criteria: (1) previous history of abdominal or pelvic surgery; (2) scoliosis deformities; (3) missing images; (4) minors; (5) inferior mesenteric vascular disease or tumor involvement resulting in suboptimal imaging; (6) poor image quality. Finally, contrast-enhanced abdominal pelvic CT data of 249 cases were collected, including 120 males and 129 females with mean age of (60.1±13.4) years. Multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) and maximum intensity projection (MIP) were used to evaluate the anatomic relationship of IMA/IMV with ureter. IMA root location, IMA length, branch types of IMA, distance between major branches, distance between IMA/IMV and ureter at the level of root of IMA, left colic artery (LCA) root, abdominal aortic bifurcation, and sacral promontory were measured and association between IMA/IMV and ureter site was summarized. Results: The distance from IMA root to the aortic bifurcation and sacral promontory was (42.0±8.5) mm and (101.8±14.0) mm, respectively. The length of IMA was (38.5±10.7) mm. The proportion of IMA roots locating at levels of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th lumbar vertebra was 3.2% (8/249), 79.5% (198/249), and 17.3% (43/249), respectively. The higher the level of the lumbar vertebra, the longer the IMA [length of IMA originating from the 2nd, 3rd, 4th lumbar vertebra level: (42.4±10.9) mm, (39.5±10.4) mm, (33.0±10.9) mm, respectively; F=7.48, P<0.001]. In 111 cases (44.6%), LCA arose independently from IMA (type 1), and the distance between LCA and the first branch of sigmoid artery (SA) was (15.0±7.4) mm; in 56 cases (22.5%), LCA and SA had a common trunk (type 2), with a length of (11.0±8.5) mm; in 78 cases (31.3%), LCA branched with SA at the same point (type 3); LCA was absent in 4 cases (1.6%)(type 4). The length of IMA in LCA-deficient type 4 was (54.8±18.0) mm, which was longer than (38.2±10.5) mm in LCA-presence type (type 1, type 2 and type 3) and the difference was statistically significant (t=-3.11, P=0.002). The distance between the ureter and IMA was the longest at the level of IMA root [(35.7±8.1) mm], was the shortest at the level of the aortic bifurcation [(22.4±6.4) mm], and the distance between the ureter and IMA in different planes was significantly different (F=185.70, P<0.001). The distance between the ureter and IMV was the longest at the level of the sacral promontory [(21.1±9.0) mm], was the shortest at the level of LCA root [(12.0±5.7) mm], whose difference was also statistically significant (F=87.66, P<0.001). Conclusions: CT post-processing techniques including MPR and MIP can efficiently and accurately assess the branch types of IMA and anatomical relationship between IMA/IMV and ureter, and provide insights into laparoscopic rectal surgery for surgeons. IMA/IMV and ureter depart farthest at the level of IMA root. Artery first and plane second strategy in the middle approach of laparoscopic rectal surgery is considerable and feasible.
Read full abstract