Abbreviated Injury Severity Score Research Articles

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures—Does race matter?

BackgroundAdvances in medical technology have widened the gaps and exposed disparities in medical treatments. The prevalence of surgical stabilization for rib fractures is rising despite its controversial indications for this treatment modality. In situations of equipoise, surgeons may find themselves choosing patients for surgery, revealing potential implicit biases. We hypothesize that there exists an inequity in surgical stabilization for rib fractures performed based on race. MethodsData were obtained from the American College of Surgeons 2013–2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database. Study participants were divided into race groups according to Trauma Quality Improvement Program data registry. To assess the association between race and surgical stabilization for rib fractures, a Poisson regression model was used. Potential confounding adjusted include race, age, sex, highest abbreviated injury severity score in each region, flail chest, sternum fracture, pneumothorax, hemothorax, pulmonary contusion, and comorbidities. ResultBlack patients were more often treated at a level 1 trauma center (74%) (P < .001). Flail chest was most common in White (3.2%) and American Indian (3.4%) patients compared with other races (P = .012). After adjusting for potential confounding in the Poisson regression analyses, Black patients were 26% less likely to undergo surgical stabilization for rib fractures (adjusted incident rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.74 [0.64–0.85], P < .001) and Asian were 40% less likely to undergo surgical stabilization for rib fractures (adjusted incident rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.60 [0.43–0.81], P = .001) than White patients. ConclusionThere is a disparity in the delivery of surgical stabilization for rib fractures in patients with rib fractures. Black and Asian patients undergo surgical stabilization for rib fractures at a significantly lower rate than their White counterparts. This discrepancy in the delivery of care is concerning and requires further study.

TXA combined with whole blood transfusion in trauma patients does not increase the risk of VTE but shock index does

IntroductionPrevious studies have demonstrated the benefits of tranexamic acid (TXA) administration in combination with packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion in trauma patients without increasing the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the effect of TXA in combination with whole blood (WB) has not been studied. Injury, abbreviated injury severity scores (ISS and AIS) and the need for blood transfusions are historically associated with VTE. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between VTE and the combination of TXA administration and transfusion of PRBCs vs. WB. MethodsOur institutional trauma registry was queried for trauma patients between 2015 and 2022 who received either WB ​+ ​TXA or PRBC ​+ ​TXA either prehospital or within 4 ​h of arrival. Multivariate analysis was utilized to determine independent risk factors for VTE, which were defined as either a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or a pulmonary embolism (PE). Model covariates included age, mechanism of injury (MOI), ISS, lower extremity AIS, comorbid conditions, and shock index (SI). Additional outcomes analyzed were hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, and ventilator days. ResultsThree hundred and five patients had complete data and were included in the analysis. Of those, 251 received WB ​+ ​TXA and 54 received PRBC ​+ ​TXA. A total of 34 patients were found to have VTE event (11.1 ​%); 28 (11.2 ​%) and 6 (11.1 ​%) from the WB ​+ ​TXA and PRBC ​+ ​TXA groups, respectively. An elevated pre-hospital SI was independently associated with increased VTE rate (OR 1.85, 95 ​% CI 1.07–3.20). WB transfusion, TXA administration, ISS, and MOI did not influence the rate of VTE. ConclusionThese data demonstrate that the combination of WB ​+ ​TXA administered to trauma patients has no higher risk of VTE than patients who receive PRBC ​+ ​TXA, a comparison that has not been studied clinically to date. Despite the pro thrombotic state enhanced by TXA and the decreased dilutional coagulopathy seen in WB resuscitation, there was no increased risk of VTE compared to TXA ​+ ​PRBC. There is no evidence that TXA combined with whole blood transfusion is associated with an increased risk of VTE. However, higher pre-hospital SI was associated with an elevated rate of VTE. These clinical features provide insight into patients who may be at an increased risk of developing VTE and may benefit from targeted prevention strategies.

Comparison of Law Enforcement Officer versus Emergency Medical Services Placed Tourniquets.

Tourniquet (TQ) use for hemorrhage control is a core skill for many law enforcement officers (LEO) and all emergency medical services (EMS) providers. However, LEO TQ training is not as intensive as EMS. Overuse of TQ can result in over triage. We hypothesize that LEO are more liberal than EMS with TQ placement. A seven-year retrospective, single center study of adult patients who had a TQ placed in the field was conducted. Data were stratified by provider who placed the TQ. Patient demographics, body location where the TQ was placed, hospital location where the TQ was removed, incidence of recurrent bleeding and need for operative control of bleeding, and name of injured vessel were recorded. Data were analyzed using student t-test and Chi-square tests. 192 patients had 197 TQ placed (LEO 77 (40%) and EMS 120 (63%). Most TQ were placed on the thigh. There was no difference in body mass index but the EMS cohort had a higher injury severity score (9.4 v 6.5, p = 0.03) and extremity abbreviated injury severity score (2.4 v 1.9, p = 0.007). LEO placed TQ were more commonly removed in the trauma bay (83% v 73%, p = 0.03). EMS placed TQ were more likely to require operative control of bleeding (23% v 6%, p = 0.003). There were no complications related to TQ use in either arm. LEO are more likely than EMS to place tourniquets without injury to a named vessel or the presence of severe bleeding. LEO need better training to determine when a TQ is needed. EMS should be allowed to remove TQ if appropriate. Studies on the impact of over triage based on TQ use are needed. Therapeutic/Care Management, Level III.

Incidence of surgical rib fixation at chest wall injury society collaborative centers and a guide for expected number of cases (CWIS-CC1).

Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) improves outcomes in certain patient populations. The Chest Wall Injury Society (CWIS) began a new initiative to recognize centers who epitomize their mission as CWIS Collaborative Centers (CWIS-CC). We sought to describe incidence and epidemiology of SSRF at our institutions. A retrospective registry evaluation of all patients (age > 15years) treated at international trauma centers from 1/1/20 to 7/30/2021 was performed. Variables included: age, gender, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, abbreviated injury severity score (AIS), emergency department disposition, length of stay, presence of rib/sternal fractures, and surgical stabilization of rib/sternal fractures. Classification and regression tree analysis (CART) was used for analysis. Data were collected from 9 centers, 26,084 patient encounters. Rib fractures were present in 24% (n = 6294). Overall, 2% of all patients underwent SSRF and 8% of patients with rib fractures underwent SSRF. CART analysis of SSRF by AIS-Chest demonstrated a difference in management by age group. AIS-Chest 3 had an SSRF rate of 3.7, 7.3, and 12.9% based on the age ranges (16-19; 80-110), (20-49; 70-79), and (50-69), respectively (p = 0.003). AIS-Chest > 3 demonstrated an SSRF rate of 9.6, 23.3, and 39.3% for age ranges (16-39; 90-99), (40-49; 80-89), and (50-79), respectively (p = 0.001). Anticipated rate of SSRF can be calculated based on number of rib fractures, AIS-Chest, and age. The disproportionate rate of SSRF in patients age 50-69 with AIS-Chest 3 and age 50-79 with AIS-Chest > 3 should be further investigated, as lower frequency of SSRF in the other age ranges may lead to care inequalities.

Epidemiology, repair technique, and predictors of stroke and mortality in penetrating carotid artery injuries

ObjectivePenetrating carotid artery injuries (PCAI) are significantly morbid and deadly, often presenting in extremis with associated injuries and central nervous system deficit. Repair may be challenging with arterial reconstruction vs ligation role poorly defined. This study evaluated contemporary outcomes and management of PCAI. MethodsPCAI patients in the National Trauma Data Bank from 2007 to 2018 were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between repair and ligation groups after additionally excluding external carotid injuries, concomitant jugular vein injuries, and head/spine Abbreviated Injury Severity score of ≥3. Primary end points were in-hospital mortality and stroke. Secondary end points were associated injury frequency and operative management. ResultsThere were 4723 PCAI (55.7% gunshot wounds, 44.1% stab wounds). Gunshot wounds more frequently had associated brain (73.8% vs 19.7%; P < .001) and spinal cord (7.6% vs 1.2%; P < .001) injuries; stab wounds more frequently had jugular vein injuries (19.7% vs 29.3%; P < .001). The overall in-hospital mortality was 21.9% and the stroke rate was 6.2%. After exclusion criteria, 239 patients underwent ligation and 483 surgical repair. Ligation patients had lower presenting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) than repair patients (13 vs 15; P = .010). Stroke rates were equivalent (10.9% vs 9.3%; P = .507); however, in-hospital mortality was higher after ligation (19.7% vs 8.7%; P < .001). In-hospital mortality was higher in ligated common carotid artery injuries (21.3% vs 11.6%; P = .028) and internal carotid artery injuries (24.5% vs 7.3%; P = .005) compared with repair. On multivariable analysis, ligation was associated with in-hospital mortality, but not with stroke. A history of neurological deficit before injury lower GCS, and higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) were associated with stroke; ligation, hypotension, higher ISS, lower GCS, and cardiac arrest were associated with in-hospital mortality. ConclusionsPCAI are associated with a 22% rate of in-hospital mortality and a 6% rate of stroke. In this study, carotid repair was not associated with a decreased stroke rate, but did have improved mortality outcomes compared with ligation. The only factors associated with postoperative stroke were low GCS, high ISS, and a history of neurological deficit before injury. Beside ligation, low GCS, high ISS, and postoperative cardiac arrest were associated with in-hospital mortality.

758 Correlation between initial and diagnostic bronchoalveolar lavage isolates among patients with inhalation injury and pneumonia

Abstract Introduction Inhalation injury is associated with increased risk of pneumonia. Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is commonly used to diagnose and grade inhalation injury while obtaining a microbiological sample. It has been shown that a quarter of patients with inhalation injury have a single bacteria isolated from initial BAL within 12-48 hours of injury. The clinical significance of this and role of antibiotics in this setting are unknown. We investigated the incidence that bacteria isolated during a pneumonia episode were previously isolated on surveillance BAL among patients with inhalation injury. Methods Among patients with inhalation injury admitted to a large ABA-verified burn center from 2009-2022, microbiological isolates from initial BAL and subsequent culture obtained during a pneumonia episode (BAL, sputum), were extracted from medical records. Abbreviated injury severity score (AIS) was used to grade inhalation injury. Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) was defined using CDC PNU1 criteria, and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) was defined using PNU2 criteria with BAL cutoff &amp;gt;10,000 colony forming units (CFU). Results Two-hundred forty-eight patients with inhalation injury who underwent bronchoscopy for airway inspection and surveillance BAL within 48 hours of injury were included in the analysis. Of the 111 who had a bacterial isolate from initial BAL, 23 (21%) subsequently developed HAP or VAP during the hospitalization. Median (IQR) days between bronchoscopy and pneumonia diagnosis was six (2-8.5). In three of the 11 VAP cases (27%), the organisms identified at pneumonia diagnosis matched the organisms identified on initial BAL. Antibiotic use on admission was not associated with re-culture of initial BAL organism during a subsequent pneumonia episode (p=0.071). Conclusions Among patients with inhalation injury and bacteria isolated on surveillance BAL, 21% developed pneumonia during their hospital stay, usually with different bacteria than those isolated at initial bronchoscopy. There was no association between empiric antibiotic use and incidence of initial BAL organisms re-cultured during subsequent pneumonia episode. Applicability of Research to Practice Findings suggest initial BAL isolates cannot guide empiric coverage of pneumonia for patients with inhalation injury. This remains an important area of future research.

Pelvic Ring Injury Mortality: Are We Getting Better?

To determine if changes in pelvic trauma care and treatment protocols have affected overall mortality rates after pelvic ring injury. Retrospective cohort study. Level I trauma center. A total of 3314 patients with pelvic ring injuries who presented to a single referral center from 1999 to 2018 were included in the study. Pelvic ring management, years 1999-2006 versus years 2007-2018. In hospital mortality. Other examined variables included change in patient demographics, fracture characteristics, date of injury, associated injuries, length of hospital stay, Abbreviated Injury Severity Score. The composite mortality rate was 6.5% (214/3314). The earliest cohort presented a mortality rate of 9.1% [111/1224; 95% confidence interval (CI), 7.6%-10.8%] compared with the more recent cohort mortality rate of 4.9% (103/2090; 95% CI, 4.1%-5.9%). Overall mortality was significantly lower in the more recent period, a risk difference of 4.1% (95% CI, 2.3%-6.1%; P < 0.01). After adjusting for age and Abbreviated Injury Severity Score of the brain, chest, and abdomen, the mortality reduction was more pronounced with an adjusted risk difference of 6.4% (95% CI, 4.7%-8.1%; P < 0.01). Significant improvement in the mortality rate of pelvic ring injuries has been demonstrated in recent years (4.9% vs. 9.1%) and the difference is even large when accounting for known confounders. Improvement appears to coincide chronologically with changes in trauma resuscitation and implementation of adjuvant treatments for managing patients with severe hemorrhagic shock. Although the exact benefit of each treatment awaits further research, these data might indicate improved care over time for these difficult patients. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Trauma in Obstetrical Patients.

Introduction:Pregnant trauma patients are an underdescribed cohort in the medical literature. Noting injury patterns and contributors to mortality may lead to improved care.Methods:Female patients between 14 and 49 years of age were identified among entries in the 2017 National Trauma Data Bank. Data points were compared using Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, Mann–Whitney rank-sum, or multiple logistic regression as appropriate. P < 0.05 was used to determine the findings of significance.Results:There were 569 pregnant trauma patients identified, which was 0.54% of the 105,507 women identified. Overall, mortality was low among all women and not different between groups (1.2% for pregnant women vs. 2.2% for nonpregnant, P = 0.12). Pregnant women with head injuries had a higher mortality rate than pregnant women without (4.2% vs. 0.47%, P < 0.01). Head injuries (Abbreviated Injury Severity Score [AIS] head >1) were associated with an increased risk for mortality (odds ratio: 3.33, 95% confidence interval: 3.0–3.7, P < 0.01).Conclusion:There was no increase in mortality for trauma patients who are pregnant when controlling for covariates. Factors such as head injuries, the need for blood, and comorbid diseases appear to have a more significant contribution to mortality. We also report the prevalence of head, cervical spine, and extremity injuries in pregnant trauma patients. Multidisciplinary simulation, jointly crafted protocols, and expanding training in regional anesthesia may be the next steps to improving care for pregnant trauma patients.

Antibody-Free Mass Spectrometry Identification of Vascular Integrity Markers in Major Trauma.

Antibody mediated strategies for protein biomarker detection are common, but may limit discovery. We hypothesized that the use of antibody-free proteomics is feasible for detecting protein biomarkers in plasma of patients sustaining major trauma. A subset of subjects with major trauma from a prospective observational trial were analyzed. Patients were assigned to one of four groups based on their presenting Abbreviated Injury Severity Score (AIS). Sensitive, antibody-free selective reaction monitoring (SRM) mass spectrometry (MS), with spiked-in isotopically labeled synthetic peptides, was used for targeted protein quantification of a panel of 10 prospective targets. An overall tiered sensitivity analytical approach was used for peptide detection and quantification based upon plasma immunoaffinity depletion and PRISM fractionation. Forty-four patients were included in the analysis, of which 82% were men with a mean age of 50 (±19) years. Half had isolated head injury (n = 22), with the remaining patients experiencing multiple injuries or polytrauma (n = 14), isolated body injury (n = 2), or minor injury (n = 6). Peptides from 3 proteins (vascular adhesion molecule 1 [VCAM1], intercellular adhesion molecule 1 [ICAM1], and matrix metalloproteinase 9 [MMP9]) were detected and quantified in non-depleted processed plasma. Peptides from 2 proteins (angiopoietin 2 [Ang2] and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 [PAI1]) were detected and quantification in depleted plasma, whereas the remaining 5 of the 10 prospective targets were undetected. VCAM1 (p = 0.02) and MMP9 (p = 0.03) were significantly upregulated in in the major trauma groups (1–3) versus mild injury group (4), whereas the others were not. There were no differences in protein expression between patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI; groups 1 and 2) versus those without TBI (groups 3 and 4). We detected non-specific upregulation of proteins reflecting blood–brain barrier breakdown in severely injured patients, indicating label-free MS techniques are feasible and may be informative.

Splenic preservation after isolated splenic blunt trauma: The angioembolization paradox

BackgroundThe spleen is the most commonly injured organ in blunt abdominal trauma. The management for splenic trauma includes nonoperative management, splenectomy, and splenic artery angioembolization. The aim of this study is to investigate recent trends in the usage of splenic artery angioembolization in patients with isolated blunt splenic trauma. MethodsAdult patients (age >15) with isolated blunt splenic trauma were identified from the National Trauma Databank (2007–2015) using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes. The defined groups included nonoperative management, splenectomy, and splenic artery angioembolization. Patient variables collected included year of traumatic injury, age, sex, race, insurance status, and geographic region. Clinical variables collected included vital signs (systolic blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate) recorded upon arrival to the emergency room, injury severity score, abbreviated injury severity scores, diagnoses, procedures, and mechanism. Outcome measures included mortality, hospital duration of stay, and complications. We performed 2 independent Poisson logistic regression models to assess relative risk for both splenectomy and angioembolization. ResultsA total of 10,812 patients were included in the analysis (nonoperative management: 7,920; splenectomy: 2,083; angioembolization: 809). Angioembolization proportion increased from 2007 (4.6%) to 2015 (10%), while splenectomy proportion remained unchanged (19.2% to 18.3%). Poisson logistic regression suggests the adjusted probability of receiving angioembolization for a splenic injury increased year-to-year, while the adjusted probability of receiving a splenectomy remained unchanged. ConclusionThe use of angioembolization for isolated blunt splenic injuries has increased over the past decade without a reciprocal change in splenectomy. Based on this study, angioembolization may be an overused resource without a significant benefit.

Acceptable Blood Pressure Levels in the Prehospital Setting for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multicenter Observational Study

Safe blood pressure levels in the prehospital setting for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between prehospital blood pressure and the outcomes of patients with TBI to determine optimal threshold for hypotension that could be considered in the prehospital setting. Using data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank, we identified adult patients (aged ≥18 years) who experienced severe TBI (maximum head Abbreviated Injury Severity score ≥3) and were transported directly from the scene of the blunt trauma occurrence to the hospital, between 2004 and 2019. We excluded patients with prehospital systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels of <60 and ≥160 mm Hg. Using mixed effects logistic regression models, we investigated the association between prehospital SBP and in-hospital mortality, considering the hospital ID as a random effect variable. In addition, we also conducted a stratified analysis based on age (<60 vs. ≥60 years). A total of 34,175 patients (16,114 aged <60 years and 18,061 aged ≥60 years) were eligible for the analyses. Plotting the adjusted odds ratios for in-hospital mortality as a function of SBP produced J-shaped curves. An SBP <110 mm Hg was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.52 (95% confidence interval: 1.39-1.65). Stratified analyses revealed that the threshold did not differ between the age groups. An SBP <110 mm Hg in the prehospital setting is significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality.

Impact of obesity on outcomes after abdominal gunshot injury.

The impact of obesity, on outcomes after a gunshot wound, remains unclear. We hypothesized that patients with obesity have a higher burden of intraabdominal injuries after gunshot injury when compared with the nonobese population. The Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2013-2017) was queried for all patients age ≥16 with abdominal gunshot injuries. Patients who died in the emergency department (ED), arrived without signs of life, had Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥ 3 in any other region, or transferred from an outside hospital were excluded. The patient with obesity was defined by a body mass index ≥ 30. Demographics, injury data, and outcomes were abstracted and analyzed. Patients with obesity were compared to those with a body mass index < 30. Multivariate logistical regression was used to compare mortality between groups. Of 34,138 patients with gunshot injuries, there were 2,616 (7.7%) with isolated abdominal injuries. Median age is 29 years (22-39 years), 86.7% men. Eight hundred twenty-seven (31.6%) were obese. The obese group was significantly older (32 [25-42] vs. 27 [22-37]; p < 0.001) with a higher incidence of hypertension (16.8% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001) and diabetes mellitus (7.1% vs. 2.3%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in presenting vital signs, abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale or Injury Severity Score between groups. The rate of superficial injuries and intraabdominal organ injuries were comparable between groups. Patients with obesity had significantly higher mortality (6.5% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.010), hospital length of stay (9 [7-16] vs. 9[6-14], p < 0.001), ventilator days (3 [2-5] vs. 3 [2-4], p = 0.015), and hospital-acquired pneumonia (3.5% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, in addition to older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.050; p < 0.001), ED hypotension (OR, 3.192; p < 0.001), and ED tachycardia (OR, 3.714; p < 0.001), obesity was significantly associated with mortality (OR, 1.636; p = 0.021). Patients with obesity are at a high risk of mortality after abdominal gunshot injury. Further prospective evaluation is warranted. Prognostic study, Level III.

Prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation post traumatic brain injury: machine learning approach

BackgroundThe study aimed to introduce a machine learning model that predicts in-hospital mortality in patients on mechanical ventilation (MV) following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted for all adult patients who sustained TBI and were hospitalized at the trauma center from January 2014 to February 2019 with an abbreviated injury severity score for head region (HAIS) ≥ 3. We used the demographic characteristics, injuries and CT findings as predictors. Logistic regression (LR) and Artificial neural networks (ANN) were used to predict the in-hospital mortality. Accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), precision, negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, specificity and F-score were used to compare the models` performance.ResultsAcross the study duration; 785 patients met the inclusion criteria (581 survived and 204 deceased). The two models (LR and ANN) achieved good performance with an accuracy over 80% and AUROC over 87%. However, when taking the other performance measures into account, LR achieved higher overall performance than the ANN with an accuracy and AUROC of 87% and 90.5%, respectively compared to 80.9% and 87.5%, respectively. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, severity of TBI as measured by abbreviated injury score, TBI diagnosis, the need for blood transfusion, heart rate upon admission to the emergency room and patient age were found to be the significant predictors of in-hospital mortality for TBI patients on MV.ConclusionsMachine learning based LR achieved good predictive performance for the prognosis in mechanically ventilated TBI patients. This study presents an opportunity to integrate machine learning methods in the trauma registry to provide instant clinical decision-making support.

The procoagulant molecule plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 is associated with injury severity and shock in patients with and without traumatic brain injury.

Traumatic injury is associated with an increased risk of coagulopathy and venous thrombosis. plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is a procoagulant molecule that inhibits tPA/uPA, thrombomodulin, and activated protein C. We hypothesized that elevated PAI-1 levels would be associated with increased Injury Severity Score (ISS) in injured patients with and without traumatic brain injury and that PAI-1 levels would vary with injury type. We retrospectively analyzed demographic, ISS, and hemodynamic data from a prospectively collected database. Patients with traumatic injury requiring intensive care unit admission (n = 268) were classified as multiple injuries, isolated body, or isolated head based on Abbreviated Injury Severity score. Admission PAI-1 levels were quantified using a Luminex analyte platform. Univariate tests for association informed the construction of a multivariate model of the relationship between PAI-1 and ISS. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 positively associated with ISS (p < 0.0001) and was highest in patients with ISS greater than 35 (p < 0.0001). Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 was significantly different between multiple injuries, isolated body, and isolated head patients (p < 0.0001). On univariate analysis, age (p = 0.0011), hypotension (p = 0.0076), and alcohol intoxication (p = 0.0024) were all positively associated with PAI-1 level. Admission international normalized ratio was not associated with PAI-1 level (p = 0.638). After adjusting for age, sex, hypotension, and alcohol intoxication, higher PAI-1 levels were associated with higher ISS (p < 0.0001). Elevated PAI-1 at admission is associated with higher ISS. This association is more pronounced in patients with hypotension. These findings suggest that PAI-1 levels may reflect the burden of endothelial damage and platelet activation after injury. Prognostic, level III.

Serotonin-Modulating Antidepressants and Risk of Bleeding after Trauma

Serotonin-modulating antidepressants have been associated with increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and increased blood loss during elective surgery. This study sought to investigate the effect of preinjury selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI) use on transfusion requirements after trauma, and to evaluate whether resumption of SSRI/SNRI after trauma may worsen bleeding risk. This was a retrospective matched-cohort study evaluating patients with solid organ injury. Preinjury SSRI/SNRI users were matched to non-SSRI/SNRI users based on age, preinjury aspirin use, Injury Severity Score, and abdominal Abbreviated Injury Severity Score. The primary endpoint was transfusion requirement during hospitalization. The absolute need for transfusion was higher in SSRI/SNRI users throughout hospitalization (50.9% vs 37.3%, P = 0.02). After logistic multivariate analysis, SSRI/SNRI users were more likely to require transfusion at 24 hours (odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 2.73 (1.41, 5.29), P = 0.003), but this difference did not persist for overall hospitalization (odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.32 (0.74, 2.36), P = 0.35). Fewer patients restarted on SSRI/SNRI therapy within 72 hours required packed red blood cell transfusion compared with those who were restarted later or not at all (43.2% vs 60.3%; P = 0.04). Preinjury use of serotonin-modulating antidepressants led to an increased requirement of blood transfusions after solid organ injury. Although clinicians should weigh bleeding risk before reinitiation of SSRI/SNRI, the results of this study indicate that reasonable efforts to restart these medications after stabilization do not result in further risk for transfusion.

Prehospital ketamine administration to pediatric trauma patients with head injuries in combat theaters

BackgroundHead injuries frequently occur in combat. Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) guidelines recommend pre-hospital use of ketamine for analgesia. Yet the use of this medication in patients with head injuries remains controversial, particularly among pediatric patients. We compare survival to hospital discharge rates among pediatric head injury subjects who received prehospital ketamine versus those who did not. MethodsWe queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric (<18 years of age) subjects from January 2007 to January 2016. We performed a sub-analysis of subjects with an abbreviated injury severity score for the head of 3 (serious) or higher and at least one documented Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤13. ResultsOf the 3439 pediatric patients within our dataset, 555 subjects met inclusion criteria for head injury – 36 (6.5%) received prehospital ketamine versus 519 (93.5%) who did not. There was no significant difference noted between groups regarding median age (10 versus 8, p = 0.259), percent male gender (72.2% versus 76.3%, p = 0.579), mechanism of injury (p = 0.143), median composite injury scores (22 versus 20, p = 0.082), median ventilator-free days (28 versus 27, p = 0.068), median ICU-free days (27.5 versus 27, p = 0.767), median hospital days (3.5 versus 4, p = 0.876) or survival to discharge (66.7% versus 70.7%, p = 0.607). ConclusionsWithin this data set, we were unable to detect any differences in mortality among pediatric head trauma subjects administered ketamine compared to subjects not receiving this medication in the prehospital setting.

Utility of Repeat Head CT in Patients on Preinjury Antithrombotic Medications

Presently, there are no standardized guidelines regarding the necessity or timing of repeat head imaging in patients on antithrombotics (antiplatelet agents, warfarin, or novel oral anticoagulants) with suspected traumatic brain injury. This is a two-year single institutional retrospective analysis of patients with suspected traumatic brain injury on antithrombotic medications. Patients with a stable or negative repeat head CT were compared with patients who developed a new bleed or demonstrated progression of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Of 110 patients, 55 patients (50%) had a positive initial CT, two patients (1.8%) developed a new bleed after initially normal head CT, and 21 patients (19.1%) demonstrated worsening ICH. Patients with worsening or delayed ICH had a higher median Injury Severity Score (14 vs 5, P < 0.001), higher head/neck and face Abbreviated Injury Severity scores (both P < 0.05), and were more likely to be receiving combination therapy with warfarin and clopidogrel (4.3% vs 0%, P = 0.05). On multivariate analysis, lower face and head/neck Abbreviated Injury Severity scores were associated with a decreased risk for delayed or worsening hemorrhage (odds ratio = 0.21 and 0.46, respectively, P < 0.05). Repeat head CT in patients on a preinjury antithrombotic has a low yield. The use of combination therapy may result in an increased risk for delayed hemorrhage or hemorrhage progression.

The evolution of care improves outcome in blunt thoracic aortic injury: A Western Trauma Association multicenter study.

The management of blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI) has evolved radically in the last decade with changes in the processes of care and the introduction of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). These changes have wrought improved outcome, but the direct effect of TEVAR on outcome remains in question as previous studies have lacked vigorous risk adjustment and long-term follow-up. To address these knowledge gaps, we compared the outcomes of TEVAR, open surgical repair, and nonoperative management for BTAI. Eight verified trauma centers recruited from the Western Trauma Association Multicenter Study Group retrospectively studied all patients with BTAI admitted between January 1, 2006, and June 30, 2016. Data included demographics, comorbidities, admitting physiology, injury severity, in-hospital care, and outcome. We studied 316 patients with BTAI; 57 (18.0%) were in extremis and died before treatment. Of the 259 treated surgically, TEVAR was performed in 176 (68.0%), open in 28 (10.8%), hybrid in 4 (1.5%), and nonoperative in 51 (19.7%). Thoracic endovascular aortic repair and open repair groups had similar Injury Severity Scale score, chest Abbreviated Injury Scale score, Trauma and Injury Severity Score, and probability of survival, but differed in median age (open: 28 [interquartile range {IQR}, 19-51]; TEVAR: 46 [IQR, 28-60]; p < 0.007), zone of aortic injury (p < 0.001), and grade of aortic injury (open: 6 [IQR, 4-6]; TEVAR: 2 [IQR, 2-4]; p < 0.001). The overall in-hospital mortality was 6.6% (TEVAR: 5.7%, open: 10.7%, nonoperative: 3.9%; p = 0.535). Of the 240 patients who survived to discharge, two died (one at 9 months and one at 8 years); both were managed with TEVAR, but the deaths were unrelated to the aortic procedure. Stent graft surveillance computed tomography scans were not obtained in 37.6%. The mortality of BTAI continues to decrease. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair, when anatomically suitable, should be the treatment of choice. Open repair remains necessary for more proximal injuries. Process improvement in computed tomography imaging in follow-up of TEVAR is warranted. Therapeutic/care management, level III.

Helmet use and injury severity among pediatric skiers and snowboarders in Colorado

IntroductionSkiing and snowboarding are popular winter recreational activities that are commonly associated with orthopedic type injuries. Unbeknownst to most parents, however, are the significant but poorly described risks for head, cervical spine and solid organ injuries. Although helmet use is not mandated for skiers and snowboarders outside of resort sponsored activities, we hypothesized that helmet use is associated with a lower risk of severe head injury, shorter ICU stay and shorter hospital length of stay. MethodsThe trauma registry at a level I pediatric trauma center in the state of Colorado was queried for children ages 3–17years, who sustained an injury while skiing or snowboarding from 1/1/1999 to 12/31/2014. Injury severity was assessed by Abbreviated Injury Severity (AIS) score, injury severity score (ISS) and admission location. Head injury was broadly defined as any trauma to the body above the lower border of the mandible. Regression analysis was used to test associations of variables with injury severity. Results549 children sustained snow sport related injuries during the 16year study period. The mean patient age was11±3years, most were male (74%) and the majority were Colorado residents (54%). The overall median ISS was 9 (IQR 4–9) and 78 children (14%) were admitted to the ICU. Colorado residents were nearly twice as likely to be wearing a helmet at the time of injury, compared to visitors from out-of-state (adjusted OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.24–2.76, p=0.002). In a multivariate analysis injury severity was significantly associated with injury while skiing (p=0.026), helmet use (p=0.0416), and sustaining a head injury (p<0.0001). In a separate multivariate analysis ICU admission was associated with head injury (p<0.0001) and wearing a helmet (p=0.0257); however, those wearing a helmet and admitted to the ICU had significantly lower ISS (p=0.007) and head AIS (p=0.011) scores than those who were not wearing a helmet at the time of injury. ConclusionVisitors from out of state were less likely to be wearing a helmet when injured and more likely to be severely injured, suggesting Colorado residents have a better understanding of the benefits of helmet usage. Helmeted skiers and snowboarders who were admitted to the ICU had significantly lower ISS and head AIS scores than those who were not helmeted. Pediatric skiers, snowboarders and their parents should be educated on the significant risks associated with these activities and the benefits of helmet usage. Level of evidenceIII.

Can Thrombelastography Predict Venous Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Severe Extremity Trauma?

Objectives: An elevated maximal amplitude (mA) value with rapid thrombelastography on admission can identify general trauma patients with an increased risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). We hypothesized that (1) the risk of VTE traditionally assigned to injury lies specifically in those who sustain major orthopaedic trauma and (2) an elevated admission mA value could be used to identify patients with major orthopaedic injuries at risk for VTE during initial hospital admission. Design: Retrospective. Setting: University level 1 trauma center. Patients/Participants: Consecutive trauma patients admitted to an urban level 1 trauma center between September 2009 and February 2011 who met the criteria for level 1 trauma activation and who were between 18 and 85 years of age were included in our study group. Two groups were created, one whose extremity abbreviated injury severity score was 2 or greater (ORTHO) and the other whose extremity abbreviated injury severity score was <2 (non-ORTHO). Main Outcome Measurements: Pulmonary emboli were confirmed by computed tomography angiography, and deep vein thromboses were confirmed by venous duplex. Univariate analyses were conducted and followed by purposeful regression analysis. Results: Of note, 1818 patients met the inclusion criteria (310 ORTHO and 1508 non-ORTHO). Despite more hypocoagulable r-TEG values on arrival (alpha angle 71 vs. 73 and mA 62 vs. 64, both P < 0.05), ORTHO patients had higher rates of VTE (6.5% vs. 2.7%, P < 0.001). Stepwise regression generated 4 values to predict development of VTE (age, male gender, white race, and ORTHO). After controlling for these variables, admission mA values ≥65 (odds ratio 3.66) and ≥72 (odds ratio 6.70) were independent predictors of VTEs during hospitalization. Conclusions: Admission rapid thrombelastography mA values can identify patients with major orthopaedic trauma injuries who present with an increased risk of in-hospital deep vein thromboses and pulmonary embolism with a 3.6-fold and 6.7-fold increased risk for mA values ≥65 and ≥72, respectively. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.