Abstract

Antibody mediated strategies for protein biomarker detection are common, but may limit discovery. We hypothesized that the use of antibody-free proteomics is feasible for detecting protein biomarkers in plasma of patients sustaining major trauma. A subset of subjects with major trauma from a prospective observational trial were analyzed. Patients were assigned to one of four groups based on their presenting Abbreviated Injury Severity Score (AIS). Sensitive, antibody-free selective reaction monitoring (SRM) mass spectrometry (MS), with spiked-in isotopically labeled synthetic peptides, was used for targeted protein quantification of a panel of 10 prospective targets. An overall tiered sensitivity analytical approach was used for peptide detection and quantification based upon plasma immunoaffinity depletion and PRISM fractionation. Forty-four patients were included in the analysis, of which 82% were men with a mean age of 50 (±19) years. Half had isolated head injury (n = 22), with the remaining patients experiencing multiple injuries or polytrauma (n = 14), isolated body injury (n = 2), or minor injury (n = 6). Peptides from 3 proteins (vascular adhesion molecule 1 [VCAM1], intercellular adhesion molecule 1 [ICAM1], and matrix metalloproteinase 9 [MMP9]) were detected and quantified in non-depleted processed plasma. Peptides from 2 proteins (angiopoietin 2 [Ang2] and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 [PAI1]) were detected and quantification in depleted plasma, whereas the remaining 5 of the 10 prospective targets were undetected. VCAM1 (p = 0.02) and MMP9 (p = 0.03) were significantly upregulated in in the major trauma groups (1–3) versus mild injury group (4), whereas the others were not. There were no differences in protein expression between patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI; groups 1 and 2) versus those without TBI (groups 3 and 4). We detected non-specific upregulation of proteins reflecting blood–brain barrier breakdown in severely injured patients, indicating label-free MS techniques are feasible and may be informative.

Highlights

  • Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a complex, multifaceted disease process encompassing numerous pathophysiological mechanisms

  • Participants and plasma samples We examined a subset of subjects from the Fever And Inflammation in Neurotrauma (FAINT) cohort, selected to represent a broad range of ages and injury types and injury severity for this pilot investigation

  • Details regarding patient identification and enrollment have been published previously,[5] but in brief, subjects were prospectively enrolled if they experienced trauma severe enough to warrant intensive care unit (ICU) admission and informed consent was obtained from the subject or their legally authorized representative

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a complex, multifaceted disease process encompassing numerous pathophysiological mechanisms. To harness this complexity, clinicians and investigators have actively pursued fluid-based biomarkers to assist with stratification, monitoring, and prognostication after TBI, with some modest successes. The U.S Food and Drug Administration’s recent approval of a blood test combining ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein to assist decision-making regarding the need for head computed tomography (CT) after mild TBI.[1] there remains a substantial gap to fill by identifying and validating new bloodbased, protein biomarkers.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call