80S Initiation Complex Research Articles

A structural view of translation initiation in bacteria.

The assembly of the protein synthesis machinery occurs during translation initiation. In bacteria, this process involves the binding of messenger RNA(mRNA) start site and fMet-tRNA(fMet) to the ribosome, which results in the formation of the first codon-anticodon interaction and sets the reading frame for the decoding of the mRNA. This interaction takes place in the peptidyl site of the 30S ribosomal subunit and is controlled by the initiation factors IF1, IF2 and IF3 to form the 30S initiation complex. The binding of the 50S subunit and the ejection of the IFs mark the irreversible transition to the elongation phase. Visualization of these ligands on the ribosome has been achieved by cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography studies, which has helped to understand the mechanism of translation initiation at the molecular level. Conformational changes associated with different functional states provide a dynamic view of the initiation process and of its regulation.

Ribosomal Intersubunit Bridge B2a Is Involved in Factor-Dependent Translation Initiation and Translational Processivity

Intersubunit bridges are important for holding together subunits in the 70S ribosome. Moreover, a number of intersubunit bridges have a role in modulating the activity of the ribosome during translation. Ribosomal intersubunit bridge B2a is formed by the interaction between the conserved 23S rRNA helix–loop 69 (H69) and the top of the 16S rRNA helix 44. Within the 70S ribosome, bridge B2a contacts translation factors and the A-site tRNA. In addition to bridging the subunits, bridge B2a has been invoked in a number of other ribosomal functions from initiation to termination. In the present work, single-nucleotide substitutions were inserted at positions 1912 and 1919 of Escherichia coli 23S rRNA (helix 69), which are involved in important intrahelical and intersubunit tertiary interactions in bridge B2a. The resulting ribosomes had a severely reduced activity in a cell-free translation elongation assay, but displayed a nearly wild-type-level peptidyl transferase activity. In vitro reassociation efficiency decreased with all of the H69 variant 50S subunits, but was severest with the A1919C and ΔH69 variants. The mutations strongly affected initiation-factor-dependent 70S initiation complex formation, but exhibited a minor effect on the nonenzymatic initiation process. The mutations decreased ribosomal processivity in vitro and caused a progressive depletion of 50S subunits in polysomal fractions in vivo. Mutations at position 1919 decreased the stability of a dipeptidyl-tRNA in the A-site, whereas the binding of the dipeptidyl-tRNA was rendered more stable with 1912 and ΔH69 mutations. Our results suggest that the H69 of 23S rRNA functions as a control element during enzymatic steps of translation.

Kinetic Analysis of Late Steps of Eukaryotic Translation Initiation

Little is known about the molecular mechanics of the late events of translation initiation in eukaryotes. We present a kinetic dissection of the transition from a preinitiation complex after start codon recognition to the final 80S initiation complex. The resulting framework reveals that eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)5B actually accelerates the rate of ribosomal subunit joining, and this acceleration is influenced by the conformation of the GTPase active site of the factor mediated by the bound nucleotide. eIF1A accelerates joining through its C-terminal interaction with eIF5B, and eIF1A release from the initiating ribosome, which occurs only after subunit joining, is accelerated by GTP hydrolysis by eIF5B. Following subunit joining, GTP hydrolysis by eIF5B alters the conformation of the final initiation complex and clears a path to promote rapid release of eIF1A. Our data, coupled with previous work, indicate that eIF1A is present on the ribosome throughout the entire initiation process and plays key roles at every stage.

Structure of the 30S translation initiation complex

Translation initiation, the rate-limiting step of the universal process of protein synthesis, proceeds through sequential, tightly regulated steps. In bacteria, the correct messenger RNA start site and the reading frame are selected when, with the help of initiation factors IF1, IF2 and IF3, the initiation codon is decoded in the peptidyl site of the 30S ribosomal subunit by the fMet-tRNA(fMet) anticodon. This yields a 30S initiation complex (30SIC) that is an intermediate in the formation of the 70S initiation complex (70SIC) that occurs on joining of the 50S ribosomal subunit to the 30SIC and release of the initiation factors. The localization of IF2 in the 30SIC has proved to be difficult so far using biochemical approaches, but could now be addressed using cryo-electron microscopy and advanced particle separation techniques on the basis of three-dimensional statistical analysis. Here we report the direct visualization of a 30SIC containing mRNA, fMet-tRNA(fMet) and initiation factors IF1 and GTP-bound IF2. We demonstrate that the fMet-tRNA(fMet) is held in a characteristic and precise position and conformation by two interactions that contribute to the formation of a stable complex: one involves the transfer RNA decoding stem which is buried in the 30S peptidyl site, and the other occurs between the carboxy-terminal domain of IF2 and the tRNA acceptor end. The structure provides insights into the mechanism of 70SIC assembly and rationalizes the rapid activation of GTP hydrolysis triggered on 30SIC-50S joining by showing that the GTP-binding domain of IF2 would directly face the GTPase-activated centre of the 50S subunit.

Structure and function of HCV IRES domains

The HCV IRES is a highly structured RNA which mediates cap-independent translation initiation in higher eukaryotes. This function is encoded in conserved structural motifs in the two major domains of HCV and HCV-like IRESs, which play crucial and distinct roles along the initiation pathway. In this review, I discuss structural features of IRES domains and how these RNA motifs function as RNA-based initiation factors to form 48S initiation complexes and 80S ribosomes with only a subset of canonical, protein-based eukaryotic initiation factors.

Translation initiation by the c-myc mRNA internal ribosome entry sequence and the poly(A) tail

Eukaryotic mRNAs possess a poly(A) tail that enhances translation via the (7)mGpppN cap structure or internal ribosome entry sequences (IRESs). Here we address the question of how cellular IRESs recruit the ribosome and how recruitment is augmented by the poly(A) tail. We show that the poly(A) tail enhances 48S complex assembly by the c-myc IRES. Remarkably, this process is independent of the poly(A) binding protein (PABP). Purification of native 48S initiation complexes assembled on c-myc IRES mRNAs and quantitative label-free analysis by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry directly identify eIFs 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 4GI, and 5 as components of the c-myc IRES 48S initiation complex. Our results demonstrate for the first time that the poly(A) tail augments the initiation step of cellular IRES-driven translation and implicate a distinct subset of translation initiation factors in this process. The mechanistic distinctions from cap-dependent translation may allow specific translational control of the c-myc mRNA and possibly other cellular mRNAs that initiate translation via IRESs.

Kinetic Checkpoint at a Late Step in Translation Initiation

The translation initiation efficiency of a given mRNA is determined by its translation initiation region (TIR). mRNAs are selected into 30S initiation complexes according to the strengths of the secondary structure of the TIR, the pairing of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence with 16S rRNA, and the interaction between initiator tRNA and the start codon. Here, we show that the conversion of the 30S initiation complex into the translating 70S ribosome constitutes another important mRNA control checkpoint. Kinetic analysis reveals that 50S subunit joining and dissociation of IF3 are strongly influenced by the nature of the codon used for initiation and the structural elements of the TIR. Coupling between the TIR and the rate of 70S initiation complex formation involves IF3- and IF1-induced rearrangements of the 30S subunit, providing a mechanism by which the ribosome senses the TIR and determines the efficiency of translational initiation of a particular mRNA.

Ribosomal position and contacts of mRNA in eukaryotic translation initiation complexes

The position of mRNA on 40S ribosomal subunits in eukaryotic initiation complexes was determined by UV crosslinking using mRNAs containing uniquely positioned 4-thiouridines. Crosslinking of mRNA positions (+)11 to ribosomal protein (rp) rpS2(S5p) and rpS3(S3p), and (+)9-(+)11 and (+)8-(+)9 to h18 and h34 of 18S rRNA, respectively, indicated that mRNA enters the mRNA-binding channel through the same layers of rRNA and proteins as in prokaryotes. Upstream of the P-site, the proximity of positions (-)3/(-)4 to rpS5(S7p) and h23b, (-)6/(-)7 to rpS14(S11p), and (-)8-(-)11 to the 3'-terminus of 18S rRNA (mRNA/rRNA elements forming the bacterial Shine-Dalgarno duplex) also resembles elements of the bacterial mRNA path. In addition to these striking parallels, differences between mRNA paths included the proximity in eukaryotic initiation complexes of positions (+)7/(+)8 to the central region of h28, (+)4/(+)5 to rpS15(S19p), and (-)6 and (-)7/(-)10 to eukaryote-specific rpS26 and rpS28, respectively. Moreover, we previously determined that eukaryotic initiation factor2alpha (eIF2alpha) contacts position (-)3, and now report that eIF3 interacts with positions (-)8-(-)17, forming an extension of the mRNA-binding channel that likely contributes to unique aspects of eukaryotic initiation.

EIF2-dependent and eIF2-independent modes of initiation on the CSFV IRES: a common role of domain II

Specific interactions of the classical swine fever virus internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) with 40S ribosomal subunits and eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF)3 enable 43S preinitiation complexes containing eIF3 and eIF2-GTP-Met-tRNA(iMet) to bind directly to the initiation codon, yielding 48S initiation complexes. We report that eIF5B or eIF5B/eIF3 also promote Met-tRNA(iMet) binding to IRES-40S complexes, forming 48S complexes that can assemble elongation-competent ribosomes. Although 48S complexes assembled both by eIF2/eIF3- and eIF5B/eIF3-mediated Met-tRNA(iMet) recruitment were destabilized by eIF1, dissociation of 48S complexes formed with eIF2 could be out-competed by efficient subunit joining. Deletion of IRES domain II, which is responsible for conformational changes induced in 40S subunits by IRES binding, eliminated the sensitivity of 48S complexes assembled by eIF2/eIF3- and eIF5B/eIF3-mediated mechanisms to eIF1-induced destabilization. However, 48S complexes formed by the eIF5B/eIF3-mediated mechanism on the truncated IRES could not undergo efficient subunit joining, as reported previously for analogous complexes assembled with eIF2, indicating that domain II is essential for general conformational changes in 48S complexes, irrespective of how they were assembled, that are required for eIF5-induced hydrolysis of eIF2-bound GTP and/or subunit joining.

A Single Mammalian Mitochondrial Translation Initiation Factor Functionally Replaces Two Bacterial Factors

The mechanism of translation in eubacteria and organelles is thought to be similar. In eubacteria, the three initiation factors IF1, IF2, and IF3 are vital. Although the homologs of IF2 and IF3 are found in mammalian mitochondria, an IF1 homolog has never been detected. Here, we show that bovine mitochondrial IF2 (IF2(mt)) complements E. coli containing a deletion of the IF2 gene (E. coli DeltainfB). We find that IF1 is no longer essential in an IF2(mt)-supported E. coli DeltainfB strain. Furthermore, biochemical and molecular modeling data show that a conserved insertion of 37 amino acids in the IF2(mt) substitutes for the function of IF1. Deletion of this insertion from IF2(mt) supports E. coli for the essential function of IF2. However, in this background, IF1 remains essential. These observations provide strong evidence that a single factor (IF2(mt)) in mammalian mitochondria performs the functions of two eubacterial factors, IF1 and IF2.

Eukaryotic translation initiation machinery can operate in a prokaryotic-like mode without eIF2

AbstractUnlike prokaryotes, a specialized eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2), in the form of the ternary complex eIF2*GTP*Met-tRNAiMet is utilized to deliver the initiator tRNA to the ribosome within all eukaryotic cells1. Phosphorylation of eIF2 is known to be central to the global regulation of protein synthesis under stress conditions and infection2. Another distinctive feature of eukaryotic translation is scanning of mRNA 5'-leaders, whose origin in evolution may be relevant to the appearance of eIF2 in eukaryotes. Translation initiation on the hepatitis C virus (HCV) internal ribosome entry site (IRES) occurs without scanning3,4. Whether these unique features of the HCV IRES account for the formation of the final 80S initiation complex is unknown. Here we show that the HCV IRES-directed translation can occur without either eIF2 or its GTPase activating protein eIF5. In addition to the general eIF2- and eIF5-dependent pathway of 80S complex assembly, the HCV IRES makes use of a prokaryotic-like pathway which involves eIF5B, the analogue of bacterial IF25,6, instead of eIF2. This switch from a eukaryotic-like mode of AUG selection to a "bacterial" one occurs when eIF2 is inactivated by phosphorylation, a way with which host cells counteract infection. The relative resistance of HCV IRES-directed translation to eIF2 phosphorylation may represent one more line of defense used by this virus against host antiviral responses and can contribute to the well known resistance of HCV to interferon based therapy.

Prior interaction of ATP with yeast mRNAs enhances protein synthesis at the initiation step

ATP hydrolysis is important for different stages of the protein synthesis process. A novel effect of this nucleotide was detected using mRNAs isolated from S. cerevisiae after phenol extraction of polysomes. When polysomal mRNA (pmRNA) or poly(A)(+) RNA were preincubated with ATP (approximately 3 mM, near physiological concentration), their translational activity in a cell-free system from yeast was stimulated 2-3 fold. This increased translational activity is specific for the poly(A)(+) RNA fraction, correlates with facilitated assembly of 80S initiation complexes, and is associated to increased synthesis of high molecular weight polypeptides. TCA precipitation assays of RNA incubated with [(14)C]ATP suggested an association of the nucleotide with the nucleic acid. The amount of [(14)C]ATP co-precipitated was dependent on magnesium (optimum at 5-6 mM), was partially inhibited by monovalent ions, and was maximal with poli(A)(+) RNA. Existence of RNA-associated kinases or ATPases appear unlikely since neither phosphorylation nor nucleotide hydrolysis were observed during preincubation of pmRNA with ATP. Another evidence of ATP-RNA interaction was an increased absorbance at 260 nm after incubation suggesting unwinding of the RNA secondary structure. Therefore, preincubation with ATP may affect the conformation of mRNAs and thereby facilitate the initiation of protein synthesis. This event could be part of an in vivo energy-dependent mechanism for translational control.

Benefit-Risk Assessment of Linezolid for Serious Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections

Linezolid is an oxazolidinone, a new class of antibacterial with a unique mechanism of action, namely inhibition of the formation of a functional 70S initiation complex in the 50S bacterial ribosomal subunit. Linezolid is highly active against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive cocci, including meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-intermediate and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci; its spectrum of activity also includes some anaerobic bacteria. Linezolid has been studied in several randomized controlled trials for the treatment of patients with community-acquired and nosocomial pneumonia, skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), urinary tract infections and bacteraemia. The available evidence suggests that linezolid is at least as effective as vancomycin for patients with nosocomial pneumonia, and there are some retrospective analyses supporting its superiority in comparison with vancomycin for MRSA nosocomial pneumonia, including ventilator-associated pneumonia. Linezolid is more effective than glycopeptides, macrolides and beta-lactams for SSTIs. The limited available data for the treatment of patients with bacteraemia suggest that it may be a better treatment option than vancomycin and beta-lactams for these patients, but questions have arisen regarding patients with catheter-related bacteraemias. Compared with other antibacterials, linezolid is associated with a greater frequency of adverse events, mainly nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and headaches. Thrombocytopenia also occurs more frequently in patients taking linezolid but there is no increased frequency of anaemia. Other adverse events potentially related to linezolid therapy include fungal infections (moniliasis), hypertension and serotonin-like syndrome, tongue discolouration and taste alterations, dizziness, insomnia, rash and Clostridium difficile-related diarrhoea. The majority of adverse events develop after prolonged administration (i.e. >2 weeks) and subside shortly after discontinuation of linezolid. Peripheral or optic neuropathy, another possible adverse effect, is associated with an even longer duration of treatment (3-6 months). In conclusion, linezolid is an important treatment option for the treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant, Gram-positive bacterial infections. However, in order to reduce the possibility of development of resistance and preserve its activity, the use of linezolid should be restricted to treatment of patients with infections associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly those caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Cold-stress-induced de novo expression of infC and role of IF3 in cold-shock translational bias

Expression of Escherichia coli infC, which encodes translation initiation factor IF3 and belongs to a transcriptional unit containing several promoters and terminators, is enhanced after cold shock, causing a transient increase of the IF3/ribosomes ratio. Here we show that after cold shock the two less used promoters (P(T) and P(I1)) remain active and/or are activated, resulting in de novo infC transcription and IF3 synthesis. These two events are partly responsible for the stoichiometric imbalance of the IF3/ribosomes ratio that contributes to establishing the cold-shock translational bias whereby cold-shock mRNAs are preferentially translated by cold-stressed cells while bulk mRNAs are discriminated against. Analysis of the IF3 functions at low temperature sheds light on the molecular mechanism by which IF3 contributes to the cold-shock translational bias. IF3 was found to cause a strong rate increase of fMet-tRNA binding to ribosomes programmed with cold-shock mRNA, an activity essential for the rapid formation of "30S initiation complexes" at low temperature. The increased IF3/ribosome ratio occurring during cold adaptation was also essential to overcome the higher stability of 70S monomers at low temperature so as to provide a sufficient pool of dissociated 30S subunits capable of "70S initiation complex" formation. Finally, at low temperature IF3 was shown to be endowed with the capacity of discriminating against translation of non-cold-shock mRNAs by a cold-shock-specific "fidelity" function operating with a mechanism different from those previously described, insofar as IF3 does not interfere with formation of 30S initiation complex containing these mRNAs, but induces the formation of nonproductive 70S initiation complexes.

Differential factor requirement to assemble translation initiation complexes at the alternative start codons of foot-and-mouth disease virus RNA

The foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) RNA contains two in-frame AUG codons separated by 84 nt that direct translation initiation of the viral polyprotein. The mechanism of initiation at the IRES-proximal AUG codon (AUG1) has been previously analyzed, whereas no data on factor requirements for AUG2 have been reported. Here, using the method of 48S translation initiation complex reconstitution, we show that eIF1 is indispensable in forming the 48S initiation complex at AUG2. In contrast, it reduces the assembly of this complex at AUG1. Stabilization of a stem-loop between the initiation triplets induces a small decrease in the toeprint intensity at AUG2, accompanied by an increase in the AUG1/AUG2 ratio as well as a moderate reduction of protein synthesis initiated at AUG2 in transfected cells. PTB and ITAF45 exerted an additive positive effect on the 48S complex at AUG2, although a substantial reconstitution on both AUGs occurs on omission of either of these proteins. Relative to the beta-globin mRNA, the 48S complex formation at AUG1 and AUG2 is slow and occurs with the same kinetics as revealed by the "kinetic" toeprint assay. Mutation of AUG1 to AUA does not abrogate protein synthesis in transfected cells, and has no effect on the rate of the 48S complex formation at AUG2. We conclude that the AUG2 initiation region is selected independently of 48S complex formation at the upstream AUG1. The kinetic toeprint assay also shows that cap-dependent assembly of the 48S complex in vitro occurs faster than the FMDV IRES-mediated complex assembly.

Translation mechanism and regulation: old players, new concepts

The meeting on Translational Control and Non‐Coding RNA took place between 8 and 12 November 2006, in Nove Hrady, the Czech Republic, and was organized by M. Pospisek and L. Valasek. ![][1] Many pathways that regulate gene expression target the complex process of protein synthesis and in particular its initiation stage. During the past 40 years or so, all the initiation factors required for the assembly of translationally competent ribosomes have been identified and their principal roles determined. Recently, there has been significant progress in determining the structure of the components of the translation apparatus: from crystal structures of prokaryotic ribosomes, to crystal and nuclear magnetic resonance structures of factors, and cryo‐electron microscopy reconstructions of functional ribosomal complexes. These advances now allow the molecular mechanisms of the stages involved in initiation to be investigated in detail. Concurrently, diverse studies have revealed that translational control regulates processes ranging from development to learning. This meeting highlighted recent advances about canonical and internal ribosome entry site (IRES)‐mediated mechanisms of eukaryotic initiation, and the control of translation during development in response to stress and by mechanisms ranging from signal transduction pathways to regulation by noncoding RNAs and RNA‐binding proteins. Canonical 5′‐end‐dependent eukaryotic translation initiation requires at least 11 initiation factors (eIFs) and occurs in two stages: formation of the 48S initiation complex at the AUG codon of messenger RNA (mRNA), and its joining with a 60S ribosomal subunit (Fig 1; Hinnebusch et al , 2007; Pestova et al , 2007). eIF1 has a crucial role in the selection of initiation codons, allowing scanning 43S complexes to discriminate against codon–anticodon mismatches and preventing premature eIF5‐induced hydrolysis of eIF2‐bound GTP and Pi release. According to a recent model, eIF1—in cooperation with eIF1A—promotes a scanning‐competent ‘open’ conformation of the 43S complex. The establishment of codon–anticodon base‐pairing leads … [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif

Position of eukaryotic initiation factor eIF5B on the 80S ribosome mapped by directed hydroxyl radical probing

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF5B is a ribosome-dependent GTPase that mediates displacement of initiation factors from the 40S ribosomal subunit in 48S initiation complexes and joining of 40S and 60S subunits. Here, we determined eIF5B's position on 80S ribosomes by directed hydroxyl radical cleavage. In the resulting model, eIF5B is located in the intersubunit cleft of the 80S ribosome: domain 1 is positioned near the GTPase activating center of the 60S subunit, domain 2 interacts with the 40S subunit (helices 3, 5 and the base of helix 15 of 18S rRNA and ribosomal protein (rp) rpS23), domain 3 is sandwiched between subunits and directly contacts several ribosomal elements including Helix 95 of 28S rRNA and helix 44 of 18S rRNA, domain 4 is near the peptidyl-transferase center and its helical subdomain contacts rpL10E. The cleavage data also indicate that binding of eIF5B might induce conformational changes in both subunits, with ribosomal segments wrapping around the factor. Some of these changes could also occur upon binding of other translational GTPases, and may contribute to factor recognition.

Identification of minimal sequences of the Rhopalosiphum padi virus 5′ untranslated region required for internal initiation of protein synthesis in mammalian, plant and insect translation systems

Rhopalosiphum padi virus (RhPV) is a member of the family Dicistroviridae. The genomes of viruses in this family contain two open reading frames, each preceded by distinct internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements. The RhPV 5' IRES is functional in mammalian, insect and plant translation systems and can form 48S initiation complexes in vitro with just the mammalian initiation factors eIF2, eIF3 and eIF1. Large regions of the 5' untranslated region (UTR) can be deleted without affecting initiation-complex formation. The minimal sequences required for directing internal initiation in mammalian (rabbit reticulocyte lysate), plant (wheatgerm extract) and insect (Sf21 cells) translation systems have now been defined. A fragment (nt 426-579) from the 3' portion of the 5' UTR can direct translation in each of these translation systems. In addition, a distinct region (nt 300-429) is also active. Thus, unstructured regions within the 5' UTR seem to be critical for IRES function.

N- and C-terminal residues of eIF1A have opposing effects on the fidelity of start codon selection

Translation initiation factor eIF1A stimulates preinitiation complex (PIC) assembly and scanning, but the molecular mechanisms of its functions are not understood. We show that the F131A,F133A mutation in the C-terminal tail (CTT) of eIF1A impairs recruitment of the eIF2-GTP-Met-tRNA(i)(Met) ternary complex to 40S subunits, eliminating functional coupling with eIF1. Mutating residues 17-21 in the N-terminal tail (NTT) of eIF1A also reduces PIC assembly, but in a manner rescued by eIF1. Interestingly, the 131,133 CTT mutation enhances initiation at UUG codons (Sui(-) phenotype) and decreases leaky scanning at AUG, while the NTT mutation 17-21 suppresses the Sui(-) phenotypes of eIF5 and eIF2beta mutations and increases leaky scanning. These findings and the opposite effects of the mutations on eIF1A binding to reconstituted PICs suggest that the NTT mutations promote an open, scanning-conducive conformation of the PIC, whereas the CTT mutations 131,133 have the reverse effect. We conclude that tight binding of eIF1A to the PIC is an important determinant of AUG selection and is modulated in opposite directions by residues in the NTT and CTT of eIF1A.

Cloning, expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic analysis of initiation factor 1 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Initiation factor 1 (IF-1; Rv3462c) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a component of the 30S initiation complex, was cloned and heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli. The protein was purified by affinity and size-exclusion chromatography and crystallized. A complete data set has been collected to high resolution. The crystals belonged to space group P2(1)2(1)2, with two molecules per asymmetric unit which are related by translational symmetry.