Sixty-four first-grade children learned a two-choice, simultaneous discrimination under one of four conditions of delayed reinforcement: (a) constant 2-sec delay; (b) constant 16-sec delay; (c) 2- and 30-sec variable delay; and (d) 2- and 30-sec covariable delay. The response measures consisted of acquisition data, visual orienting responses (eye movements), starting speeds, and response speeds. The results indicated that (a) constant 16-sec delay produced poorer discrimination performance than constant 2-sec delay; (b) constant 16-sec delay resulted in more visual orienting than constant 2-sec delay; (c) discrimination performance under covariable delay was superior to performance under constant 16-sec delay; and (d) differences in starting speeds between learners and nonlearners were not correlated with differences in the number of orienting responses. Alternative interpretations of delayed reinforcement effects were discussed.
Read full abstract