5-year Breast Cancer-specific Survival Research Articles

Major surgical postoperative complications and survival in breast cancer: Swedish population-based register study in 57 152 women.

Postoperative complications may activate prometastatic systemic pathways through tissue damage, wound healing, infection, and inflammation. Postoperative complications are associated with inferior survival in several types of cancer. The aim was to determine the association between postoperative complications and survival in breast cancer. This population-based cohort included women operated for T1-3 N0-3 M0 invasive breast cancer in Sweden from 2008 to 2017. Only major surgical postoperative complications leading to readmission and/or reoperation within 30 days were considered. Main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Prospectively collected nationwide register data were used. Multivariable Cox models were adjusted for clinical and socioeconomic confounders and co-morbidity. Among 57 152 women, major surgical postoperative complications were registered for 1854 patients. Median follow-up was 6.22 (0.09-11.70) years. Overall, 9163 patients died, and 3472 died from breast cancer. Major surgical postoperative complications were more common after mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction (7.3 and 4.3 per cent respectively) than after breast-conserving surgery (2.3 per cent). Unadjusted 5-year OS and BCSS rates were 82.6 (95 per cent c.i. 80.8 to 84.5) and 92.1 (90.8 to 93.5) per cent respectively for women with a major surgical postoperative complication, and 88.8 (88.6 to 89.1) and 95.0 (94.8 to 95.2) per cent for those without a complication (P < 0.001). After adjustment, all-cause and breast cancer mortality rates remained higher after a major surgical postoperative complication (OS: HR 1.32, 95 per cent c.i. 1.15 to 1.51; BCSS: HR 1.31, 1.04 to 1.65). After stratification for type of breast surgery, this association remained significant only for women who had mastectomy without reconstruction (OS: HR 1.41, 1.20 to 1.66; BCSS: HR 1.36, 1.03 to 1.79). Major surgical postoperative complications are associated with inferior survival, especially after mastectomy. These results underline the importance of surgical de-escalation.

Impact of Marital Status on Prognosis of Patients With Invasive Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study Using SEER Database.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the prognostic roles of marital status in patients with invasive breast cancer. Method: We extracted the data of patients with invasive breast cancer who were diagnosed during 2010–2015 and had complete staging and molecular typing from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 database. Kaplan–Meier curve method and Cox regression analysis were performed to investigate the differences in breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) in the total population and various subgroups with different marital statuses.ResultsAmong the 324,062 patients with breast cancer in this study, 55.0%, 40.0%, and 5.0% were married, unmarried, and unknown, respectively; 51.8%, 32.2%, 10.5%, and 5.5% were patients with Stages I, II, III, and IV breast cancer, respectively. The 5-year BCSS and OS of married patients were 92.6% and 88.1%, respectively, higher than those of unmarried patients (88.3% and 78.1%, P < 0.001). After adjustment for sex, age, T and N stages, histological grade, insurance status, race, year of diagnosis, and molecular subtypes, married status was an independent predictor of better BCSS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.775, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.753–0.797, P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.667, 95% CI = 0.653–0.681, P < 0.001). After multivariate analysis of various subgroups of sex, age, stage, histological grade, insurance status, race, and molecular subtype, married status was an independent predictor of better BCSS in all subgroups except for Grade IV, age < 35 years, and uninsured subgroups. Marital status was an independent predictor of better OS in all subgroups except the subgroup with age <35 years.ConclusionsIn conclusion, marital status was an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer. The unmarried patients with breast cancer had a worse prognosis, except for the subgroup with age <35 years. Hence, unmarried patients with breast cancer and age ≥35 years may need additional psychosocial and emotional support to achieve more prolonged survival, besides active treatment of primary disease.

Evaluation of Adjuvant Treatments for Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Breast: A Population-Based, Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study from the SEER Database.

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is an extremely rare type of breast cancer. The role of adjuvant treatments for ACC remains controversial. Patients with a histology-confirmed diagnosis of ACC of the breast were identified based on the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the baseline characteristics. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression models were performed to determine the impact of the adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) associated with breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 1036 patients with ACC of the breast were included. After a median follow-up of 11.3 years, the 10-year OS and BCSS rate was 76.2% and 92.6%, respectively. After PSM, adjuvant CT converted into neither OS (Log-rank p = 1.000) nor BCSS (Log-rank p = 0.900) benefits in patients with ACC of the breast. Adjuvant RT also did not improve OS (Log-rank p = 0.060) and BCSS (Log-rank p = 0.400). According to the univariate stratified analysis, adjuvant RT was favorable for OS in patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45, 0.99, p = 0.042). From the multivariate analysis, histology grade and nodal status were independent prognostic factors for both OS and BCSS. In conclusion, ACC of the breast presented a favorable prognosis. Adjuvant treatment, especially adjuvant CT, might not be essential for patients with this disease.

Survival benefit from axillary surgery in patients aged 70 years or older with clinically node-negative breast cancer: A population-based propensity-score matched analysis

BackgroundOlder patients with breast cancer have good prognosis and most die from diseases other than breast cancer. Previous studies suggested that the surgical extent in older patients could be reduced. We aimed to compare survival outcomes in patients aged ≥70 years with clinically node-negative breast cancer, based on whether axillary surgery was performed. MethodsA total of 2,995 patients with breast cancer aged ≥70 years who underwent breast surgery were included in the Korean Breast Cancer Registry. Patients were classified into two groups according to the performance of axillary surgery. We used propensity score matching for demographic and treatment factors to minimize selection bias. We compared the 5-year overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). ResultsAmong 708 patients after 3:1 propensity score matching, 531 underwent breast surgery with axillary surgery and 177 underwent breast surgery alone. Of all patients, 51.7% had T1 stage, and 73.2% underwent mastectomy. Approximately 31.2% of patients received chemotherapy. Among patients who did not undergo axillary surgery, the 5-year OS and BCSS rates were 85.2% and 96.7%, respectively. The hazard ratio of axillary surgery for OS was 0.943 (95% confidence interval 0.652–1.365, p = 0.757), indicating no significant difference between two groups. ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that axillary surgery in a matched cohort of older patients with breast cancer and clinically negative nodes does not provide a survival benefit compared to patients undergoing breast surgery alone. These findings suggest that axillary surgery may be safely omitted in a select group of patients aged ≥70 years with clinically node-negative cancer. Further studies are needed to identify potential candidates for omitting axillary surgery.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment with or without pertuzumab in patients with stage II and III HER2-positive breast cancer: a nationwide cohort analysis of pathologic response and 5-year survival

BackgroundPathologic complete response (pCR) rates in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer improved after pertuzumab was added to neoadjuvant treatment. However, survival benefit is less-well established and seems mostly limited to node-positive patients. We used national cancer registry data to compare outcomes of patients treated with and without pertuzumab. MethodsWe identified stage II-III HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy between November 2013 until January 2016 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. During that period pertuzumab was only available in the 37 hospitals that participated in the TRAIN-2 study. Missing grade and pCR-status were obtained from the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) and cause of death from Statistics Netherlands. We used multiple imputation to impute missing data, multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between pertuzumab and pCR (ypT0/is, ypN0) and multivariable Cox regression models for overall survival and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS). ResultsWe identified 1124 patients of whom 453 received pertuzumab. Baseline characteristics were comparable, although tumor grade was missing more often in patients treated without pertuzumab (12% vs. 2%). Pertuzumab improved pCR rates (41% vs 65%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.91; 95% CI:2.20–3.94). After a median follow-up of 6.0 years, 5-year BCSS rates were 95% and 98% respectively (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.58; 95% CI:0.36–0.95). Younger patients derived more benefit from pertuzumab, but no other significant interactions were found. ConclusionThese results support earlier data of a small survival benefit with the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy which is most meaningful in younger patients.

Association Between Residence in Historically Redlined Districts Indicative of Structural Racism and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Breast Cancer Outcomes

Historical structural racism may be associated with racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities in breast cancer outcomes, but few studies have investigated these potential relationships. To test associations among historical mortgage lending discrimination (using 1930s Home Owners' Loan Corporation [HOLC] redlining data), race and ethnicity, tumor clinicopathologic features, and survival among women recently diagnosed with breast cancer. This cohort study used a population-based, state cancer registry to analyze breast tumor clinicopathology and breast cancer-specific death among women diagnosed from 2008 to 2017 and followed up through 2019. Participants included all primary, histologically confirmed, invasive breast cancer cases diagnosed among women aged at least 20 years and who resided in a HOLC-graded area of New Jersey. Those missing race and ethnicity data (n = 61) were excluded. Data were analyzed between June and December 2021. HOLC risk grades of A ("best"), B ("still desirable"), C ("definitely declining"), and D ("hazardous" [ie, redlined area]). Late stage at diagnosis, high tumor grade, triple-negative subtype (lacking estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression), breast cancer-specific death. Among a total of 14 964 women with breast cancer, 2689 were Latina, 3506 were non-Latina Black, 7686 were non-Latina White, and 1083 were other races and ethnicities (non-Latina Asian/Pacific Islander/Native American/Alaska Native/Hawaiian or not otherwise specified); there were 1755 breast cancer-specific deaths. Median follow-up time was 5.3 years (95% CI, 5.2-5.3 years) and estimated 5-year breast cancer-specific survival was 88.0% (95% CI, 87.4%-88.6%). Estimated associations between HOLC grade and each breast cancer outcome varied by race and ethnicity; compared with residence in HOLC redlined areas, residence in HOLC areas graded "best" was associated with lower odds of late-stage diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 0.34 [95% CI, 0.22-0.53]), lower odds of high tumor grade (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.57-0.91]), lower odds of triple-negative subtype (OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.47-0.95]), and lower hazard of breast cancer-specific death (hazard ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.35-0.65]), but only among non-Latina White women. There was no evidence supporting associations among non-Latina Black or Latina women. Compared with redlined areas, current residence in non-redlined areas was associated with more favorable breast cancer outcomes, but only among non-Latina White women. Future studies should examine additional factors to inform how historical structural racism could be associated with beneficial cancer outcomes among privileged racial and ethnic groups.

Breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for breast cancer: a ten-year follow-up single-center real-world study.

BackgroundThe rapid development of early diagnostic methods and systematic treatment for breast cancer have shed lights on the insight of prognosis of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy. However, there are relatively few studies with long-term follow-up, large patient cohort and under the contemporary setting in China on the subject of survival of patients undergoing breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy.MethodsData on the cases of breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy for breast cancer from October 1, 2005 to September 31, 2010 were retrieved from the breast cancer database of Chinese PLA General Hospital. The clinicopathological characteristics of patients were compared by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Breast cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, loco-regional recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival were calculated and compared by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test firstly. And then Cox Proportional-Hazards model was used for multivariate analysis.ResultsThere were 296 patients in the breast-conserving surgery group and 675 patients in the mastectomy group. For patients with invasive breast cancer in the entire cohort, the 10-year breast cancer-specific survival rate of patients in the breast-conserving surgery group at stage I-II was significantly higher than that of the mastectomy group. However, surgical method was not an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival and local recurrence-free survival. Moreover, N stage and luminal B-like subtype were independent prognostic factors for the breast cancer-specific survival of invasive breast cancer in the entire cohort.ConclusionsThis study suggests that there is no significant difference in breast cancer-specific survival between breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy after adjusting for confounding factors. Lymph node staging is the major risk factor affecting patients’ survival. In this case, choosing patients with smaller tumor size, avoiding patients with stage N3, and removing a smaller volume of breast tissue including tumors while ensuring negative margins may reduce the patient’s risk of local recurrence and loco-regional recurrence.

Association of Ki-67 Change Pattern After Core Needle Biopsy and Prognosis in HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer Patients.

BackgroundTo investigate the association of Ki-67 change pattern after core needle biopsy (CNB) and prognosis in HR+/HER2− early breast cancer patients.MethodEligible patients were categorized into three groups: Low group, Elevation group, and High group. Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis were used to compare the clinic-pathological characteristics. Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the rates of recurrence-free interval (RFI) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), which were compared via the Log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to investigate independent prognostic factors.ResultsA total of 2,858 patients were included: 1,179 (41.3%), 482 (16.9%), and 1,197 (41.8%) patients were classified into the low, elevation, and high groups, respectively. Age, tumor size, histological grade, lymph-vascular invasion (LVI), and ER level status were associated with Ki-67 change pattern after CNB. With a median follow-up of 53.6 months, the estimated 5-year RFI rates for the low group, elevation, and high groups were 96.4%, 95.3% and 90.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). And 5-year BCSS rates were 99.3%, 98.3% and 96.8%, respectively (P = 0.001). Compared with patients in the low group, patients in the high group had significantly worse RFI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16–2.54) in multivariate analysis.ConclusionsKi-67 change after CNB was associated with prognosis in HR+/HER2− early breast cancer. Patients with Ki-67 high or elevation after CNB had an inferior disease outcome, indicating the necessity of re-evaluating Ki-67 on surgical specimens after CNB.

Effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy on T1-2N1M0 triple-negative breast cancer.

The effect of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on T1-2N1M0 triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) remains unclear. The population-based study aimed to investigate the survival outcomes of T1-2N1M0 TNBC patients who underwent PMRT or not. We selected 1743 patients with T1-2N1M0 TNBC who underwent mastectomy between 2010 and 2015 through the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. After propensity score matching (PSM), the PMRT and no-PMRT groups consisted of 586 matched patients, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to calculate breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the prognostic factors of T1-2N1M0 TNBC. The 5-year BCSS for the PMRT and no-PMRT groups was 79.1% and 74.7%, respectively. Analysis showed that in patients with three nodes positive, radiotherapy could significantly improve BCSS (HR = 0.396, 95% CI = 0.175-0.900, P = 0.027), but it brought no significant advantage in BCSS in patients with one or two nodes positive (HR = 1.061, 95% CI = 0.725-1.552, P = 0.761; HR = 0.657, 95% CI = 0.405-1.065, P = 0.088). In addition, PMRT improves the BCSS in TNBC patients with T2 tumor concomitant with three positive lymph nodes (HR = 0.343, 95% CI = 0.132-0.890, P = 0.028). TNBC patients with T2 tumor concomitant with three positive lymph nodes can benefit from PMRT.

Regional Lymph Node Metastasis and Axillary Surgery of Microinvasive Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.

Microinvasive breast cancer (MBC for short) is a rare entity with the decision of axillary surgery under debate in clinical practice. We aimed to unravel the lymph node metastasis (LNM) rate, axillary surgery, and prognosis of MBC based on 11,692 patients derived from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2003 and 2015. In this retrospective study, 19.5% (2276/11,692) of patients received axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), 80.5% (9416/11,692) received non-ALND. In the total cohort, 10-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was 96.3%, and the LNM rate was 6.4% (754/11,692). Multivariate analyses showed that LNM had the strongest predictive weight (N3, HR 14.200, 95% CI 7.933–25.417; N2, HR 12.945, 95% CI 7.725–21.694; N1, HR 3.05, 95% CI 2.246–4.140, all p < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier analyses showed that ALND did not confer a survival benefit on 10-year BCS in patients with N0 (94.7% vs. 97.1%, p < 0.001) and in patients with 1–2 positive nodes (92.1% vs. 89.5%, p = 0.355), respectively, when compared to non-ALND. Our study demonstrated that the vast majority of MBC have a low LNM rate and excellent prognosis; patients with LNM showed poor prognosis. Assessment of lymph node status is necessary, and non-ALND surgery is required and sufficient for MBC with 0–2 positive nodes.

The impact of chemotherapy and survival prediction by machine learning in early Elderly Triple Negative Breast Cancer (eTNBC): a population based study from the SEER database

PurposeWe aimed to analysis the impact of chemotherapy and establish prediction models of prognosis in early elderly triple negative breast cancer (eTNBC) by using machine learning.MethodsWe enrolled 4,696 patients in SEER Database who were 70 years or older, diagnosed with primary early TNBC(larger than 5 mm), from 2010 to 2016. The propensity-score matched method was utilized to reduce covariable imbalance. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to compare breast cancer-specific survival(BCSS) and overall survival(OS). Nine models were developed by machine learning to predict the 5-year OS and BCSS for patients received chemotherapy.ResultsCompared to matched patients in no-chemotherapy group, multivariate analysis showed a better survival in chemotherapy group. Stratified analyses by stage demonstrated that patients with stage II and stage III other than stage I could benefit from chemotherapy. Further investigation in stage II found that chemotherapy was a better prognostic indicator for patients with T2N0M0 and stage IIb, but not in T1N1M0. Patients with grade III could achieve a better survival by receiving chemotherapy, but those with grade I and II couldn’t. With 0.75 in 5-year BCSS and 0.81 in 5-year OS for AUC, the LightGBM outperformed other algorithms.ConclusionFor early eTNBC patients with stage I, T1N1M0 and grade I-II, chemotherapy couldn’t improve survival. Therefore, de-escalation therapy might be appropriate for selected patients. The LightGBM is a trustful model to predict the survival and provide precious systemic treatment for patients received chemotherapy.

Effect of Breast Conservation Therapy vs Mastectomy on Overall Survival and Breast Cancer-Specific Survival Among Men With Stage I-II Breast Cancer: Analysis of SEER, 2000-2018

BackgroundMale breast cancer is a rare malignant tumor, and outcomes of breast conservation therapy (BCT) are currently lacking. MethodThe retrospective, population-based cohort study included 1369 stage I-II (T1–2 N0–1 M0) male breast cancer patients from the SEER database (2000-2018). The patients were grouped in two groups: BCT group and mastectomy group, according to surgical and radiation therapy. Kaplan-Meier method and univariable Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between two treatment groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the confounding factors. ResultsOf the 1369 men, 97 (7%) patients received BCT, 1272 (93%) received mastectomy alone. The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 92.3% and 80.7% for BCT group compared with 80.4% and 61.4% for mastectomy group. The 5- and 10-year BCSS rates were 96.5% and 93.9% for patients undergoing BCT, as compared with 93.1% and 84.4% for patients undergoing mastectomy. Compared with mastectomy group, BCT group showed improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.294; 95% CI 0.138-0.623, P = .002) and BCSS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.182; 95% CI 0.040-0.820, P = .027). Of the 791 patients with T1 stage, BCT showed insignificant association with OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.555; 95% CI 0.207-1.488, P = .242) and BCSS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.217; 95% CI 0.171-8.675, P = .844). ConclusionThe results of this cohort study suggest that BCT is at least equivalent to mastectomy in male breast cancer patients. The underlying mechanism of this association needs further research.

Improvement of survival in Korean breast cancer patients over a 14-year period: A large-scale single-center study.

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the chronological changes over 14 years in the survival of Korean patients with breast cancer. We also sought to investigate the factors that may have influenced the changes in survival rate.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 17,776 breast cancer patients who were treated at Asan Medical Center between January 2000 and December 2013. Patient information was collected from the Asan database, including age at diagnosis, clinical manifestation, pathology report, types of treatment and modality, types of recurrence, and follow-up period. We classified the patients into two cohorts according to the year of their surgery (P1: 2000–2007 and P2: 2008–2013) and compared survival and recurrence between both cohorts.ResultsWe observed that patients treated more recently had better survival outcomes. The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival increased from 94.0% in P1 to 96.6% in P2 (p<0.001), and the 5-year disease-free survival increased from 87.9% in P1 to 91.2% in P2 (p<0.001). When analyzed by type of recurrence, distant metastasis-free survival increased to a significant degree. In subgroup analysis by the subtypes of breast cancer, the survival rates improved in all of the subtypes except triple negative breast cancer, and the improvement was more prominent in subtypes with overexpressed human epidermal growth factor receptor 2.ConclusionThis study showed improvement in breast cancer survival over the succeeding years, which is consistent with the advancement in systemic therapy.

Abstract P3-12-11: Survival differences in Filipino versus white women with breast cancer in the United States: A SEER-based analysis

Abstract Purpose: We compared survival rates for American Filipino and White women with breast cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of Filipino and White women with breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 to 2015 in the SEER18 registries database. We collected data on age and year at diagnosis, median household income, marital status, tumour size, tumour grade, lymph node status, stage, receptor status (ER, PR, and HER-2/neu receptor), surgical treatment (lumpectomy versus mastectomy), receipt of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and death. Filippino and White women were compared for demographic, pathologic and treatment variables and differences were assessed using standardized differences. We compared crude breast cancer-specific mortality rates between the two ethnic groups. We also calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HR) in a propensity-matched design using the Cox proportional hazards model. Women were matched on the year and age at diagnosis (both within 2 years), tumour grade, nodal status, clinical stage, ER status, HER2/neu status and propensity score. The propensity score accounted for marital status, household income, tumour size, PR status and surgical procedure. A log-rank test was used to compare differences between groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. P values &amp;lt; .05 were considered statistically significant. Results: There were 10,834 Filipino women (2.5%) and 414,618 White women (97.5%) with stage I-IV breast cancer captured in the SEER database. Mean age at diagnosis was younger for Filipino women compared with White women (57.5 vs 60.8 years, P &amp;lt; .0001). There was a higher proportion of Filipino women presenting with a higher clinical stage at presentation (P &amp;lt; .0001), node-positivity (35.4% vs 33.4%, P = .0002), and HER-2 positivity (12.1% vs 7.4%, P &amp;lt; .0001) compared with White women. Among women with stage I-IIIC breast cancer, 10-year breast cancer-specific survival was 87.7% for Filipino women, compared with 85.6% for White women. Filipino women had a lower rate of breast cancer-specific death as compared with White women (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.78 - 0.89; P &amp;lt; .0001). We performed a 1:3 propensity-matched analysis and matched 8,120 Filipino patients to 24,360 white patients. The cancer-specific survival from breast cancer after 10 years of follow-up among matched patients was 92.9% for Filipino women and 90.2% for White women. The hazard ratio in the matched analysis was 0.73 (95% CI 0.66 - 0.81), compared with the crude hazard ratio of 0.84 (95% CI 0.78 - 0.89). The matched analysis demonstrate that Filipino women had better survival than White women overall, and within subgroups defined by age of diagnosis, tumour grade, clinical stage, nodal status, estrogen receptor and HER2 receptor status. The most pronounced effects were observed for HER2 positivity (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20-0.71), node-negative patients (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.57-0.82) and stage II patients (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58 - 0.79). Conclusion: Filipino women with breast cancer present with more advanced disease compared to White women but have a better breast cancer-specific survival. Over a 13-year follow-up period, Filipino women with stage I-IIIC breast cancer experienced a 27% reduction in rate of breast cancer death as compared with White women with similar cancers. Compliance with treatment and follow-up or intrinsic biological differences may underlie the improved survival of Filipino women compared with White women, despite presenting with more advanced disease. Citation Format: David Wai Lim, Vasily Giannakeas, Steven A Narod. Survival differences in Filipino versus white women with breast cancer in the United States: A SEER-based analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-11.

Care of Seniors with Breast Cancer – Treatment Received and Refining Decision Making

AimsTreatment decisions for older patients with breast cancer are complex and evidence is largely extrapolated from younger populations. Frailty and comorbidity need to be considered. We studied the baseline characteristics and treatment decisions in older patients in Christchurch with breast cancer and assessed survival outcomes and prognostic/discriminatory performance of several tools. Materials and methodsWe searched the Canterbury Breast Cancer Registry and identified patients aged 70 years or older at diagnosis with invasive, non-metastatic breast cancer between 1 June 2009 and 30 June 2015. We retrieved demographics, treatment and outcome information. Overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival were estimated. Tools analysing performance status and comorbidity were assessed for their prognostic and discriminatory power. ResultsIn total, 440 patients were identified. Primary surgery was carried out for 362 patients (82.3%): breast-conserving surgery in 114 (of whom 88.6% received radiation therapy); mastectomy in 248 (of whom 24.6% received radiation). Hormone therapy was given for 265 (71.1%) patients with oestrogen receptor-positive cancers. Two hundred and seventy-four (62.3%) patients received full standard treatment, which was associated with significantly improved 5-year survival and 5-year breast cancer-specific survival. The median estimated overall survival was 8.2 years (95% confidence interval 7.3–9.1 years). Of those who died, 71.3% of deaths were due to causes other than breast cancer or unknown causes. The comorbidity-adjusted life expectancy (CALE) showed partial prognostic accuracy. CALE, Charlson and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group tools all showed discriminatory value. ConclusionIn this population-based series of older patients with breast cancer, showing high levels of primary and adjuvant treatment, patients were more likely to die of causes other than breast cancer. Performance status and comorbidity tools showed prognostic and discriminatory potential in this population supporting their use in treatment decision making. CALE showed the most potential to improve treatment decisions but requires validation in this population to improve prognostic accuracy.

Survival analysis in patients with invasive lobular cancer and invasive ductal cancer according to hormone receptor expression status in the Korean population.

BackgroundWe compared the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) cases with those of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) cases in various hormone receptor expression subgroups.MethodsWe compared clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between patients with IDC (n = 95,486) and ILC (n = 3,023). In addition, we analyzed the effects of different hormone receptor expression subgroups on survival.ResultsThe ILC group had more instances of advanced stage and hormonal receptor positivity than did the IDC group (p < 0.001), but the IDC group had higher histological grade and nuclear grade, as well as higher frequency of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and Ki67 expression than did the ILC group (p < 0.001). The OS and BCSS were not significantly different between the IDC and ILC groups. The 5-year OS of the IDC group was 88.8%, while that of the ILC group was 90.6% (p = 0.113). The 5-year BCSS of the IDC group was 94.8%, while that of the ILC group was 95.0% (p = 0.552). When analyzing each hormone receptor expression subgroup, there were no significant differences in survival between the IDC and ILC groups. However, the estrogen receptor (ER) negative/progesterone receptor (PR) negative subgroup showed differences in survival between the IDC and ILC groups. Moreover, the hazard ratio of ILC in the ER negative/PR negative subgroup was 1.345 (95% confidence interval: 1.012–1.788; p = 0.041).ConclusionsHormone receptor expression should be considered when determining prognosis and treatment regimen for IDC and ILC. Researchers should further study the ER negative/PR negative population to identify treatment and prognostic models that will facilitate the development of individualized therapy for these patients, which is needed for good outcomes.

Oncologic outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction in young women with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Oncologic safety of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in young women with breast cancer is not well-defined, especially in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We retrospectively compared the oncologic outcomes following nipple-sparing (NSM)/skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and conventional mastectomy (CM) alone in young breast cancer patients after NACT. A total of 1266 women with primary breast cancer who underwent NACT followed by total mastectomy with or without IBR were reviewed. Of these, only young patients (age ≤ 40years at diagnosis) were included in the outcome analysis (n = 375). After propensity score-matching by clinical T and N stage, molecular subtype, response to NACT, and adjuvant radiotherapy status, 228 patients were 1:1 matched, comprising balanced IBR group (with NSM/SSM) and CM-alone group. The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free, disease-free, distant metastasis (DM)-free, and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rates for the entire cohort of young patients were 83.4%, 65.3%, 71.7%, and 85.4%, respectively. Locoregional recurrence rates between the matched groups were similar (14% vs. 15.8%; p = 0.710); however, IBR group had significantly lower DM rate (27.2% vs. 40.4%; p = 0.036) and breast cancer mortality (14.9% vs. 27.2%; p = 0.023) than CM-alone group. IBR group showed significantly improved 5-year DM-free survival (74.1% vs. 62.6%; p = 0.043) and BCSS (89.1% vs. 77.6%; p = 0.048) rates than CM-alone group. Our results indicated that IBR with NSM/SSM does not negatively affect long-term oncologic outcomes compared to CM alone in young women with breast cancer receiving NACT.

Impact of Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy for Sentinel Lymph Node Micrometastases in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients.

BackgroundThe association of radiotherapy with breast cancer survival in patients who underwent a mastectomy and had micrometastases in the sentinel lymph node is unclear.Material/MethodsThe survival benefit of radiotherapy was examined in patients with T0/1-T2N1mi breast cancer undergoing mastectomy plus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Kaplan-Meier curves were employed for survival analysis and competing risk analysis, and a propensity score matching (PSM) cohort was enrolled to investigate whether such patients benefit from radiotherapy.ResultsWe identified 2864 patients in the SEER database from 2004 to 2015. All eligible patients were divided into the radiotherapy and the no-radiotherapy cohorts. With the median follow-up of 53 months, 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was 94.4% vs 95.2% (P=0.135), and 5-year overall survival (OS) was 91.2% vs 90.1% (P=0.466) in the radiotherapy cohorts and no-radiotherapy cohorts, respectively. The results of the competing risk analysis showed a comparable 5-year cumulative incidence of breast cancer-specific death (BCSD) in the radiotherapy and no-radiotherapy groups (5.5% vs 4.7%, P=0.107) but a higher 5-year cumulative incidence of other causes of death (OCD) in the no-radiotherapy cohort (3.3% vs 5.3%, P=0.011). No significant difference was observed for BCSS or OS in the PSM cohort.ConclusionsRadiotherapy has no benefit for patients with T0/1-T2 breast cancer undergoing mastectomy with N1mi disease on SLNB. This analysis provides evidence that radiotherapy may safely be omitted in this group of patients.

Nonmetastatic breast cancer patients subsequently developing second primary malignancy: A population-based study.

BackgroundWith life span extending, breast cancer (BC) survivors may face the possibility of developing second primary cancer (SPC) and considerably shorten survivorship. However, little is known about multiple primary cancer (MPC) patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer as a first primary malignancy (BCFPM).MethodsHere, we retrospectively analyzed data on cancer survivors with BCFPM diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The prognostic factors for breast cancer‐specific survival (BCSS) were ascertained by the stepwise regression analysis and a competing risk model, and were integrated to the establishment of prognostic nomogram, of which the accuracy was measured by the calibration curve and the concordance index (C‐index).ResultsIn total, 8616 patients were identified with 4.6% of 3‐year breast cancer‐ specific death (BCSD) and 8.6% of 5‐year BCSD. The most common SPC among BCFPM patients were female BC and lung cancer. Besides, the median latency time between BC and SPC was 22 months. At a ratio of 7:3, all patients were randomly categorized into a training cohort (n = 6032) and a validation cohort (n = 2584). By a proportional subdistribution hazards regression analysis, the following factors were considered to own independent prognostic abilities of BCSS: subtypes, grade, T classification, N classification, radiation, and sites of SPC. The nomogram could accurately predict 3‐year and 5‐year breast cancer‐associated survival of BCFPM patients with high internal and external validated C‐index, 0.715 (95% CI, 0.691–0.739), and 0.683 (95% CI, 0.642–0.724), respectively.ConclusionsBC survivors remained a high risk of developing SPC and considerably shortened survival time. In this study, a favorable nomogram was constructed to as a prediction model for 3‐year and 5‐year BCSS of BCFPM patients, largely intending to prolong the life of these patients by assisting clinicians to make individualized follow‐up plans.

Increased Risk for Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence in Invasive Lobular Carcinoma after Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Brachytherapy.

The suitability criteria for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) from the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), and The Groupe Européende Curiethérapie European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) have significant differences. This is a single institution retrospective review of 946 consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent lumpectomy and APBI intracavitary brachytherapy from 2003 to 2018. Overall survival (OS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up time was 60.2 months. Median age was 68 years (46-94 years). The majority of patients had estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease (94%). There were 821 (87%) cases of invasive ductal carcinoma and 68 cases (7%) of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). The 5-year OS, BCSS, RFS, and IBTR were 93%, 99%, 90%, and 1.5%, respectively. Upon univariate analysis, ILC (hazard ratio [HR], 4.6; p=.008) and lack of nodal evaluation (HR, 6.9; p=.01) were risk factors for IBTR. The 10-year IBTR was 2.5% for IDC and 14% for ILC. While the ABS and ASTRO criteria could not predict IBTR, the GEC-ESTRO intermediate risk group was associated with inferior IBTR (p=.04) when compared to both low risk and high risk groups. None of the suitability criteria was able to predict RFS. These results show that APBI is an effective treatment for patients with invasive breast cancer. Expansion of the current eligibility criteria should be considered, although prospective validation is needed. Caution is required when considering APBI for patients with ILC. In a large retrospective review of 946 patients with early breast cancer treated with partial mastectomy and accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) intracavitary brachytherapy, this study demonstrates durable local control. Patients deemed unsuitable or high risk by the American Brachytherapy Society, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology guidelines were not at increased risk for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), suggesting that expansion of the current criteria should be considered. Importantly, however, these results demonstrate that caution should be taken when considering APBI for patients with invasive lobular carcinoma, as these patients had relatively high risk for IBTR (10-year IBTR, 14%).