5-year Breast Cancer-specific Survival Research Articles

Mammographic Breast Density at Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Breast Cancer-Specific Survival

Background: Breast density impacts upon breast cancer risk and recurrence, but its influence on breast cancer-specific survival is unclear. This study examines the influence of mammographic breast density (MBD) at diagnosis on breast cancer-specific survival. Methods: The data of 224 patients diagnosed with breast cancer were analyzed. Two area-based MBD measurement tools—AutoDensity and LIBRA—were used to measure MBD via a mammogram of the contralateral breast acquired at the time of diagnosis. These patients were split into two groups based on their percent breast density (PBD): high (PBD ≥ 20%) versus low (PBD < 20%). Breast cancer-specific survival in each of these PBD groups was assessed at a median follow-up of 34 months using Kaplan–Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The proportion of women with low PBD who died from breast cancer was significantly higher than that seen with high PBD (p = 0.01). The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival was poorer among women with low PBD than those with high PBD (0.348; 95% CI: 0.13–0.94) vs. 0.87; 95% CI: (0.8–0.96); p < 0.001)]. Women with higher breast density demonstrated longer survival regardless of the method of PBD measurement: LIBRA [log-rank test (Mantel–Cox): 9.4; p = 0.002)]; AutoDensity [log-rank test (Mantel–Cox) 7.6; p = 0.006]. Multivariate analysis also demonstrated that there was a higher risk of breast cancer-related deaths in women with low PBD (adjusted HR: 5.167; 95% CI: 1.974–13.521; p = 0.001). Conclusion: Women with <20% breast density at breast cancer diagnosis demonstrate poor survival regarding the disease. The impact of breast density on survival is not influenced by the method of measurement.

Trends and efficacy of omitting axillary lymph node dissection in early-stage male breast cancer with limited nodal involvement: A population-based cohort study.

The effectiveness of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in managing early-stage male breast cancer (MBC) patients with T1-2 tumors and limited lymph node metastasis, all receiving radiotherapy, remains uncertain. This study examines trends and survival outcomes for SLNB and ALND in the United States. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data from 2010 to 2020 for MBC patients with T1-2 tumors and 1-2 positive lymph nodes undergoing radiotherapy. Patients were classified by nodes removed (SLNB ≤5, ALND ≥10), comparing overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between the groups before and after propensity score matching. Of 299 MBC patients analyzed, SLNB usage increased from 18.8% in 2010 to 61.0% in 2020. Multivariable logistic regression highlighted significant associations of SLNB use with diagnosis year, race, surgery type, positive lymph node count, and metastasis size. No significant differences in 5-year OS (77.98% SLNB vs. 85.85% ALND, p = 0.337) or BCSS (91.54% SLNB vs. 94.97% ALND, p = 0.214) were observed. Propensity score matching (96 patients per group) confirmed similar 5-year OS (83.9% for SLNB vs. 82.0% for ALND, p = 0.925) and BCSS (90.1% for SLNB vs. 96.9% for ALND, p = 0.167). SLNB and ALND provide comparable survival outcomes in early-stage MBC patients with limited lymph node metastasis undergoing radiotherapy. The increased utilization of SLNB supports its consideration to reduce surgical morbidity in selected MBC patients despite limited direct evidence.

Assessment of Treatment Sequence in Patients With Stage III Breast Cancer

IntroductionStage III breast cancer is defined as locally advanced breast cancer and is treated with curative intent. Historically, overall survival (OS) did not differ based on treatment sequence (neoadjuvant chemotherapy [NAC] followed by surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy). Given recent advancements, we examined if treatment sequence may be associated with improved OS in a contemporary cohort of patients with stage III breast cancer. MethodsPatients aged 18-80 years with prognostic stage III breast cancer who received chemotherapy and surgery were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients were stratified by treatment sequence (NAC versus surgery first). Unadjusted OS and breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared with log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association of treatment sequence with OS and BCSS after adjustment for selected covariates. ResultsThe study included 26,573 patients; median follow-up was 62.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 61.0-63.0). Patients receiving NAC had a worse OS and BCSS compared to those who underwent surgery first (5-year OS rates 0.66 versus 0.73; 5-year BCSS rates 0.70 versus 0.77; both log-rank P < 0.001). After adjustment for tumor subtype, receipt of NAC (versus surgery first) remained associated with a worse OS (hazard ratio 1.27, 95% CI 1.2-1.34, P < 0.001) and BCSS (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% CI 1.27-1.43, P < 0.001). ConclusionsBased on data from patients treated largely before 2020, undergoing surgery first may be associated with improved survival, even after adjustment for known covariates including tumor subtype. These findings may inform treatment when caring for patients with operable, locally advanced breast cancer.

Update on the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: current approach and future perspectives.

The standard treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ became well established through the results of several valuable clinical trials, and its therapeutic benefits have now come to be taken for granted. Ductal carcinoma in situ has an extremely good prognosis with the current treatment approach, with a 10-year breast cancer-specific survival rate of 97-98%. According to one retrospective cohort study, the breast cancer-specific survival rate of patients with low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ does not differ significantly between patients undergoing and not undergoing surgery. Some patients with ductal carcinoma in situ are not at a risk of progression to invasive cancer, but the predictors of such progression have not yet been clearly identified. Therefore, the same therapeutic strategies have been used to treat ductal carcinoma in situ and under the assumption that they have risks of invasive breast cancer, and a well-balanced risk/benefit ratio in respect of treatment has not yet been achieved. Based on the results of several recent clinical trials aimed at ensuring provision of a well-balanced treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ which carries a good prognosis, de-escalation of postoperative adjuvant therapy has now begun. Currently, not only is the optimization of postoperative adjuvant therapy accelerating, but also clinical trials to de-escalate basic surgical treatments are under way. There is a possibility of achieving individualized treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast with reduced treatment intervention. In this review, we present an overview of the current treatment approaches and potential future management strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Breast-conserving surgery versus modified radical mastectomy in T1-2N3M0 stage breast cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiotherapy and mastectomy exhibit highly comparable prognoses for early-stage breast cancer; however, the safety of BCS for T1-2N3M0 breast cancer remains unclear. This study compared long-term survival for BCS versus (vs.) modified radical mastectomy (MRM) among patients with T1-2N3M0 breast cancer. Data of patients with T1-2N3M0 breast cancer were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Eligible patients were divided into 2 groups, BCS and MRM; Pearson's chi-squared test was used to estimate differences in clinicopathological features. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the effects of surgical methods and other factors on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS). In total, 2124 patients were included; after PSM, 596 patients were allocated to each group. BCS exhibited the same 5-year BCSS (77.9% vs. 77.7%; P = 0.814) and OS (76.1% vs. 74.6%; P = 0.862) as MRM in the matched cohorts. Multivariate survival analysis revealed that BCS had the same BCSS and OS as MRM (hazard ratios [HR] 0.899 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.697-1.160], P = 0.413 and HR 0.858 [95% CI 0.675-1.089], P = 0.208, respectively); this was also seen in most subgroups. BCS demonstrated better BCSS (HR 0.558 [95% CI 0.335-0.929]; P = 0.025) and OS (HR 0.605 [95% CI 0.377-0.972]; P = 0.038) than MRM in those with the triple-negative subtype. BCS has the same long-term survival as MRM in T1-2N3M0 breast cancer and may be a better choice for triple-negative breast cancer.

Intraoperative radiotherapy: An alternative to whole-breast external beam radiotherapy in the management of highly selective breast cancer: A SEER database analysis.

This study aimed to verify if intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) can achieve the same survival outcome as whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in early breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and to explore the suitable candidates that can safely receive IORT after BCS. Eligible post-BCS patients who received IORT or EBRT were included in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2018. Risk factors that affected 5-year overall survival (OS) or breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) were identified by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Clinical characteristics, OS, and BCSS were comparatively analyzed between the two treatment modalities. The survival analysis after propensity score matching confirmed that patients who received IORT (n = 2200) had a better 5-year OS than those who received EBRT (n = 2200) (p = 0.015). However, the two groups did not differ significantly in 5-year BCSS (p = 0.381). This feature persisted even after multivariate analyses that took into account numerous clinical characteristics. Although there was no significant difference in BCSS between different subgroups of patients treated with IORT or EBRT, patients over 55 years of age, with T1, N0, non-triple negative breast cancers, hormone receptor-positive, and histologic grade II showed a better OS after receiving IORT. In low-risk, early-stage breast cancer, IORT was not inferior to EBRT considering 5-year BCSS and OS. Considering the equivalent clinical outcome but less radiotoxicity, IORT might be a reasonable alternative to EBRT in highly selective patients undergoing BCS.

Axillary lymph node removal in de novo metastatic breast cancer.

Several prospective studies have found that local surgical resection did not improve the survival of patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer (dnMBC). However, a significant portion of dnMBC patients still undergo local surgery, and the role of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in dnMBC patients remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of ALND in patients with dnMBC. We included patients diagnosed with dnMBC between 2010 and 2020 using the data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. The Chi-square test, binomial logistic regression, propensity score matching (PSM), Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate Cox proportional models were employed for statistical analysis. A total of 6,838 patients were identified, with 5,562 (81.3%) in the ALND group and 1,276 (18.7%) in the non-ALND group. Being diagnosed in later years emerged as an independent predictive factor related to the receipt of ALND (P=0.003). Before PSM, the 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was 51.1% and 38.2% in those with and without ALND, respectively (P<0.001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 45.9% and 32.3% in those with and without ALND, respectively (P<0.001). ALND was identified as an independent prognostic factor related to better BCSS (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001) compared to the non-ALND group. Similar findings were observed after PSM. The outcomes were significantly better in the ALND group than in the non-ALND group in most subgroups. However, the number of removed lymph nodes did not show a significant association with BCSS (P=0.27) and OS (P=0.29). Our study suggests that ALND is associated with improved survival outcomes in dnMBC patients. These findings advocate for a re-evaluation of the role of surgical interventions in dnMBC, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment strategies that consider the potential benefits of ALND.

Surveillance for Distant Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients Who Underwent Contemporary Management: A Report from the Korean Breast Cancer Society Survivor Research Group

BackgroundCurrent guidelines recommend against the use of routine imaging tests to detect distant metastasis in asymptomatic breast cancer patients. However, recent advancements in effective therapeutics and diagnostic accuracy have raised the need to reassess the clinical efficacy of intensive metastasis surveillance. We report the results of a multicenter retrospective study to investigate the association between intensive imaging studies and survival outcomes.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 4130 patients who underwent surgery from 11 hospitals in Korea between January 2010 and December 2011. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the intensity of metastasis imaging studies during their disease-free period. The types and intervals of the imaging studies were based on each physician’s decisions.ResultsHigh-intensive screening showed a shorter distant metastasis-free survival [p < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) 1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29–2.04], especially for patients in whom bone or lung was the first site of metastasis. With a median follow-up period of 110.0 months, the 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rate was 96.5%. The high-intensity screening group showed significantly poorer BCSS compared with the low-intensity screening group (p < 0.001, HR 3.13; 95% CI 2.32–4.21). However, both multivariable analysis and propensity score matching analysis showed no significant association between the screening intensity and BCSS.ConclusionsFrequent imaging studies to detect distant metastasis were associated with earlier detection of distant metastasis, especially for lung and bone metastasis. However, intensive surveillance showed no apparent association with BCSS despite the use of currently available treatments.

Salvage Breast-Conserving Surgery and Reirradiation With Intraoperative Electrons for Recurrent Breast Cancer: A Multicentric Study on Behalf of Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO)

AimIntraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (IOERT) may represent a viable choice for partial breast re-irradiation (rePBI) after repeat quadrantectomy for local recurrence (LR) for primary breast cancer (BC) in lieu of mastectomy. Materials and MethodsA database collecting data on rePBI with IOERT from 8 Italian centres was set up in 2016- 2018, providing data on cumulative incidence (CumI) of 2nd LR nd survival with a long follow-up (FU) ResultsFrom 2002 to 2015, 109 patients underwent the conservative retreatment.The median primary BC -1stLR interval was 11.1 years (range: 2.4-27.7). The median 1stLR size was 0.9 cm (range: 0.3-3.0) and 43.6% were Luminal A. Median IOERT dose was 18 Gy (range: 12-21) and median collimator was 4 cm (range: 3-6). Median FU was 11.7 years (interquartile range: 7.7-14.6). The 2ndLR CumI was 12.2% (95% CI: 6.8-19.2) at 5 years and 32.3% at 10 years (95% CI: 22.8-42.2), occurring in the same site as the 1stLR in about half of the cases. HER2 status and collimator size were independent LR predictors. The 5- and 10-year overall survival were 95.2% and 88.3%, respectively, while 5- and 10-year BC specific survival were 98% and 94.5%. The development of a 2ndLR significantly reduced BCSS (HR=9.40, P<0.001). Grade ≥3 fibrosis was 18.9%. Patient-reported cosmesis was good/excellent in 59.7% of the cases. Conclusion2ndLR CumI was within the range of the literature, but higher than expected, opening questions on radiation field extension and fractionation schedule. Since a 2ndLR worsened the outcome, salvage modality must be carefully planned.

Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Patients With Stage I Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Untreated With Chemotherapy

The absolute benefit of chemotherapy for all patients with stage I triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unclear, and biomarkers are not currently available for selecting patients with an excellent outcome for whom neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy may have negligible benefit. High levels of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are associated with favorable survival in TNBC, but data solely in stage I TNBC are lacking. To examine the outcomes of patients of all ages with stage I TNBC solely and who received neither neoadjuvant nor adjuvant chemotherapy, according to centrally reviewed sTIL levels at prespecified cutoffs. This cohort study used the Netherlands Cancer Registry to identify patients diagnosed with stage I TNBC between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2015, who were not treated with chemotherapy. Only patients who did not receive neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy were selected. The clinical data were matched with their corresponding pathology data provided by the Dutch Pathology Registry. Data analysis was performed between February and October 2023. The primary end point was breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) at 5, 10, and 15 years for the prespecified sTIL level cutoffs of 30%, 50%, and 75%. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were used for central review of histologic subtype, grade, and lymphovascular invasion. The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines were used to score the sTIL levels; these levels were determined for 1041 patients. Of a total of 4511 females with stage I TNBC, patients who were not treated with chemotherapy were selected and tissue blocks requested; sTILs were scored in 1041 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 64.4 [11.1] years, median follow-up 11.4 [95% CI, 10.9-11.9] years) who were included in the analyses.. Most tumors (952 [91.5%]) were invasive carcinomas of nonspecial histologic subtype. Most patients (548 [52.6%]) had pT1cN0 tumors. Median (range) sTIL level was 5% (1%-99%). A total of 775 patients (74.4%) had sTIL levels below 30%, 266 (25.6%) had 30% or greater, 203 (19.5%) had 50% or greater, and 141 (13.5%) had 75% or greater. Patients with pT1abN0 tumors had a more favorable outcome vs patients with pT1cN0 tumors, with a 10-year BCSS of 92% (95% CI, 89%-94%) vs 86% (95% CI, 82%-89%). In the overall cohort, sTIL levels of at least 30% were associated with better BCSS compared with sTIL levels less than 30% (96% and 87%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.77). High sTIL levels of 50% or greater were associated with a better outcome than low sTIL levels of less than 50% (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.74) in patients with pT1C tumors, with a 10-year BCSS of 95% increasing to 98% with sTIL levels of 75% or greater. Results of this study showed that patients with stage I TNBC and high level of sTILs who did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy had excellent 10-year BCSS. The findings further support the role of sTILs as integral biomarkers in prospective clinical trials of therapy optimization for this patient population.

Prognostic value of lymphocytes in patients with breast cancer receiving radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: A post hoc analysis of a phase III randomized trial

PurposeTo evaluate the prognostic value of peripheral lymphocyte count (PLC) in the breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with radiotherapy (RT). Methods and MaterialsThis post hoc analysis was performed using data of 628 patients from a phase III, randomized controlled trial comparing hypofractionated RT (HFRT) with conventional fractionated RT (CFRT) after BCS. PLCs were obtained before, during, and after RT until the 1-year follow-up. The optimal cut-off PLCs were determined using the maxstat package in R. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. ResultsA total of 275 (46.1 %) patients developed lymphopenia during RT, among them, 17 (2.8 %) had grade 3 lymphopenia and no one developed grade 4 lymphopenia. With a median follow-up of 110.8 months, patients with pre-RT PLCs of < 1.77 × 109/L had a significantly lower 10-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) rate (P = 0.013) and overall survival (OS) rate (P = 0.026). Patients with a nadir PLC of < 1.35 × 109/L had a significantly poorer 10-year OS rate (P = 0.048). Multivariate analysis showed that a pre-RT PLC of < 1.77 × 109/L was an independent factor influencing BCSS and OS, while the effect of the nadir PLC did not remain significant. Neither PLC nor lymphopenia recovery at post-RT 1, 3, and 6 months and 1 year was associated with survival. ConclusionsRadiation-induced lymphopenia in patients with breast cancer after BCS tends to be mild. The lower pre-RT PLC predicted poorer survival.

Triple-negative breast cancer survival prediction: population-based research using the SEER database and an external validation cohort.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is linked to a poorer outlook, heightened aggressiveness relative to other breast cancer variants, and limited treatment choices. The absence of conventional treatment methods makes TNBC patients susceptible to metastasis. The objective of this research was to assess the clinical and pathological traits of TNBC patients, predict the influence of risk elements on their outlook, and create a prediction model to assist doctors in treating TNBC patients and enhancing their prognosis. We included 23,394 individuals with complete baseline clinical data and survival information who were diagnosed with primary TNBC between 2010 and 2015 based on the SEER database. External validation utilised a group from The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University. Independent risk factors linked to TNBC prognosis were identified through univariate, multivariate, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression methods. These characteristics were chosen as parameters to develop 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) nomogram models. Model accuracy was assessed using calibration curves, consistency indices (C-indices), receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs), and decision curve analyses (DCAs). Finally, TNBC patients were divided into groups of high, medium, and low risk, employing the nomogram model for conducting a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. In the training cohort, variables such as age at diagnosis, marital status, grade, T stage, N stage, M stage, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy were linked to OS and BCSS. For the nomogram, the C-indices stood at 0.762, 0.747, and 0.764 in forecasting OS across the training, internal validation, and external validation groups, respectively. Additionally, the C-index values for the training, internal validation, and external validation groups in BCSS prediction stood at 0.793, 0.755, and 0.811, in that order. The findings revealed that the calibration of our nomogram model was successful, and the time-variant ROC curves highlighted its effectiveness in clinical settings. Ultimately, the clinical DCA showcased the prospective clinical advantages of the suggested model. Furthermore, the online version was simple to use, and nomogram classification may enhance the differentiation of TNBC prognosis and distinguish risk groups more accurately. These nomograms are precise tools for assessing risk in patients with TNBC and forecasting survival. They can help doctors identify prognostic markers and create more effective treatment plans for patients with TNBC, providing more accurate assessments of their 3- and 5-year OS and BCSS.

Abstract PO1-28-10: Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes identify patients with stage I TNBC with excellent outcome without chemotherapy

Abstract Introduction International guidelines recommend chemotherapy for most patients with stage I triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), except for special histological subtypes. However, the absolute benefit of systemic treatment for all stage I TNBC patients is not well known and no tools are yet available to select patients with an excellent prognosis for whom the chemotherapy can be safely omitted. High levels of stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are strongly associated with favorable prognosis in TNBC, however, data solely focusing on patients with stage I TNBC who did not receive chemotherapy are lacking. Methods Patients with pT1N0M0 TNBC diagnosed between 2005 and 2015 not treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy were identified from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) and linked to the national pathology database (PALGA). Newly sectioned hematoxylin &amp; eosin (H&amp;E) slides were used for central review of the histology and sTILs scoring following the International TIL working group guidelines (www.tilsinbreastcancer.org). Cause of death was provided by Statistics Netherlands (CBS). Primary endpoint was breast-cancer specific survival (BCSS) at 5-, 10- and 15-years for prespecified sTILs cut-offs of 30%, 50% and 75% sTILs. Results sTILs were evaluated for 1,041 patients with stage I TNBC who did not receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Mean age at diagnosis was 64.4 years [range 26 – 96] and median sTILs value was 5%. Most tumors (91.5%) were invasive ductal adenocarcinomas of no special type (NST) and 6.6% were of histological special types. In 52% of the patients the tumor was &amp;gt;1cm (pT1cN0). Median follow-up was 9.4 years in which 335 patients had died, of whom 107 due to breast cancer. Patients with pT1abN0 tumors had a favorable prognosis compared with patients with a pT1cN0 tumor (HR 0.47, CI 0.32- 0.72). 10-year BCSS in patients with pT1ab was 91.8% and 85.8% in patients with pT1c tumors. In the overall cohort, sTILs-levels of at least 30% were associated with better BCSS compared to sTILs &amp;lt; 30% (HR 0.45, CI 0.26 – 0.77), with 10year-BCSS of 96% and 87%, respectively (table 1). Patients with TNBC of special histological subtype had low sTILs (median 1%). A univariate cox model showed no association between sTILs (continuous) and BCSS in TNBC of special histological subtype (p = 0.56). Next, the prognostic value of sTILs was evaluated separately for pT1ab and pT1c. High sTILs ≥50% were not associated with improved BCSS compared to low sTILs &amp;lt; 50% in patients with pT1ab (HR 1.35, CI 0.65 – 2.82, p = 0.42). In contrast, high sTILs ≥50% showed a strong prognostic importance over low sTILs &amp;lt; 50% (HR 0.27, CI 0.10 – 0.74) in patients with pT1C tumors. We found excellent 10year-BCSS of 95% for patients if sTILs ≥50%, which further increases to 98% with sTILs ≥75% contrasting 10year-BCSS of 83% for patients with sTILs &amp;lt; 30%. Conclusions sTILs-levels provide important prognostic information in patients with stage I TNBC who did not receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. The outcome of patients with pT1c TNBC and sTILs ≥50% was excellent, with 10year-BCSS of 95%, and 98% if sTILs &amp;gt;75%. This large registry study provides a foundation for clinical trials in patients with stage I TNBC with high TILs to prospectively confirm their excellent survival without chemotherapy. Citation Format: Veerle Geurts, Sara Balduzzi, Hugo Horlings, Tessa G Steenbruggen, Sabine Siesling, Sylvia Adams, Gabe Sonke, Roberto Salgado, Marleen Kok. Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes identify patients with stage I TNBC with excellent outcome without chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-28-10.

Abstract PO3-02-06: Predictive Factors for adjuvant radiation use in patients &amp;gt;70 years with pT1N0 HR+ breast cancers

Abstract Introduction: In 2004 the CALGB 9343 study reported that women &amp;gt;70 years of age with pT1NO hormone receptor positive breast cancer received no meaningful benefit from breast irradiation following lumpectomy. Although there was a modest reduction in local recurrence, there was no improvement in rates of mastectomy for local recurrence, distant metastases, 5-year overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival therefore concluding that it was reasonable to omit radiation therapy in this group. An update of the CALGB 9343 study in 2013 with 10-year follow-up came to the same conclusion. Previous analysis of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the SEER database showed, however, that the majority of women with these characteristics were still receiving radiation therapy. We conducted this retrospective analysis from NCDB to identify factors associated with the use of radiation in this population. Methods: We reviewed the NCDB database and collected records of all breast cancer patients aged &amp;gt;70 years, who had hormone positive (HR+), pT1N0 disease between the years of 2004-2019. They were separated into radiation and non-radiation cohorts and then stratified based on ethnicity, age groups, insurance status, income quartiles, education quartiles, areas of residence, tumor size, comorbidities, diagnosis to treatment time, treatment facility type and geographic location. We then compared mortality between the two cohorts and completed a multivariate analysis to determine the demographic and clinical factors associated with the likelihood of receiving radiation. SAS was used for analysis and p-value &amp;lt; 0.05 was deemed as statistically significant. Results: 147,611 patients met the criteria of age &amp;gt; 70, pT1N0, HR+ treated with surgical lumpectomy. The majority of them were white, aged 70-75y, had Medicare, were in higher education and income quartiles and lived in metro areas (Table 1). 57.9% of the total study population received radiation. The possibility of receiving radiation decreased as age increased beyond 75 years. Uninsured patients, Medicare patients, those with comorbities, higher educational status as well as those who lived 20+ miles away from their treatment facility and treated at urban centers in central or south Atlantic areas were less likely to receive radiation. Those treated at Comprehensive community cancer programs and middle Atlantic areas were more likely to receive radiation. The possibility of radiation also progressively increased with tumor size. However, there were no differences observed when stratified by race, income status or chemotherapy use (Table 2). We also noted a small overall survival advantage for the radiation cohort (HR 0.77, p-value &amp;lt; 0.0001) which could be explained by the fact that patients without comorbidities were more likely to receive radiation. Discussion: Our results provide a real-world estimate of radiation use in pT1N0 HR+ early-stage breast cancer in women &amp;gt; 70 years. The major predictors of radiation use included younger age, low co-morbidities, insurance and institutions providing care. Lack of awareness about recent updates or concern about local recurrence could be contributing to the continued use of radiation. Although there are minor differences when stratified by demographics, it is concerning that the overall trend of radiation use has not significantly decreased over time. Since there is currently no data to support the routine use of radiation in this patient group as evidenced by randomized controlled trials, it is prudent to avoid radiation. This approach would help reduce healthcare costs, patient inconvenience and associated morbidity. Table 1 Baseline characteristics Table 2 Factors affecting radiation use Citation Format: Suma Sri Chennapragada, Runhua Shi, Shivani Sharma, Gary Burton. Predictive Factors for adjuvant radiation use in patients &amp;gt;70 years with pT1N0 HR+ breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-02-06.

Is postmastectomy radiotherapy necessary for breast cancer patients with clinically node-positive downstaging to ypN0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

The significance of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in breast cancer patients who initially have clinically node-positive (cN +) status but achieve downstaging to ypN0 following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains uncertain. This study aims to assess the impact of PMRT in this patient subset. Patients were enrolled from West China Hospital, Sichuan University from 2008 to 2019. Overall survival (OS), Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and assessed with the log-rank test. The impact of PMRT was further analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce the selection bias. Of the 333 eligible patients, 189 (56.8%) received PMRT, and 144 (43.2%) did not. At a median follow-up period of 71months, the five-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS rates were 99.1%, 93.4%, 96.4%, and 94.3% for the entire cohort, respectively. Additionally, the 5-year LRFS, DMFS, BCSS, and OS rates were 98.9%, 93.8%, 96.7%, and 94.5% with PMRT and 99.2%, 91.3%, 94.9%, and 92.0% without PMRT, respectively (all p-values not statistically significant). After multivariate analysis, PMRT was not a significant risk factor for any of the endpoints. When further stratified by stage, PMRT did not show any survival benefit for patients with stage II-III diseases. In the context of comprehensive treatments, PMRT might be exempted in ypN0 breast cancer patients. Further large-scale, randomized controlled studies are required to investigate the significance of PMRT in this patient subset.

Five-year survival prognosis of young, middle-aged, and elderly adult female invasive breast cancer patients by clinical and lifestyle characteristics

PurposeEarly-onset breast cancer incidence has been increasing globally and in Taiwan. However, previous studies have not comprehensively examined how clinical and lifestyle characteristics influence the 5-year survival of breast cancer diagnosed at different stages of adulthood.MethodsWe analyzed the Taiwan National Cancer Registry and Cause of Death datasets to understand how clinical factors (including tumor and treatment characteristics) and lifestyle factors (including body mass index, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption) were associated with the 5-year survival of 8471 young, 57,695 middle-aged, and 14,074 elderly female adult invasive breast cancer patients respectively diagnosed at age 20–39, 40–64, and ≥ 65 years between 2002 and 2015, with mortality follow-up to 2020. Poisson regression was used for obtaining the crude and adjusted 5-year survival risk ratios.ResultsClinical and lifestyle characteristics were distributed differently but had mostly similar direction of association with 5-year survival for the three age groups. Receiving any treatment was associated with better survival, especially for elderly patients. Being underweight at initial cancer treatment was associated with worse survival than having normal weight, especially for elderly patients. Current smokers had worse survival than never smokers for middle-aged and elderly patients. The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival was not significantly higher for those of age 45–49 years than 40–44 years, despite the recommended starting screening age is 45 years in Taiwan.ConclusionOur findings contribute to the understanding of early-onset and later-onset female breast cancer characteristics and prognosis, which may inform surveillance and treatment strategies to achieve better breast cancer prognosis.

An exploratory study of whether axillary lymph node dissection can be avoided in breast cancer patients with positive lymph nodes.

Breast cancer patients with positive axillary lymph nodes usually require axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), with many postoperative complications, such as lymphedema. For these patients, whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can replace ALND has been a research hotspot in the field of breast cancer. This study developed two risk stratification models for predicting the clinical outcomes of breast cancer patients with positive axillary lymph nodes receiving SLNB alone or ALND to determine which patients could potentially avoid ALND. A total of 21,942 breast cancer patients, including a training set (n=15,362) and a testing set (n=6,580), were enrolled in this study from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) between 2000 and 2017. The risk factors associated with breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using multivariate Cox regression analysis and then integrated into nomograms and risk stratification models examined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curves. The survival discrepancies were compared between the SLNB and ALND subgroups with different risk scores with Kaplan-Meier plots. In multivariate Cox regression analyses, grade, marital status, T stage, radiotherapy and lymph node metastasis (GMTRL) were independent risk factors in breast cancer patients with both OS and BCSS status in the ALND cohort from the training set. Nomograms have been developed based on these factors to predict 3- and 5-year OS and BCSS in patients with ALND. Calibration curves and ROC curves in both the training and testing sets confirmed the excellent overall predictive performance of the nomograms. Furthermore, we developed two risk stratification models based on OS and BCSS status, revealing that patients with low GMTRL scores might avoid ALND in both OS and BCSS status [OS: hazard ratio (HR) =0.929, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.841-1.027, P=0.150; BCSS: HR =0.953, 95% CI: 0.831-1.094, P=0.495], but patients with moderate (OS: HR =0.756, 95% CI: 0.666-0.859, P<0.001; BCSS: HR =0.643, 95% CI: 0.537-0.768, P<0.001) and high GMTRL scores could not (OS: HR =0.719, 95% CI: 0.549-0.940, P=0.014; BCSS: HR =0.731, 95% CI: 0.549-0.974, P=0.031). Breast cancer patients with positive nodes could be treated with SLNB alone rather than ALND without affecting prognosis based on GMTRL scores. Patients with high or moderate GMTRL scores benefited greatly from ALND, but not for patients with low GMTRL scores. This study may assist clinicians in tailoring treatments.

ER+/PR− phenotype exhibits more aggressive biological features and worse outcome compared with ER+/PR+ phenotype in HER2-negative inflammatory breast cancer

The loss of progesterone receptor (PR) often predicts worse biological behavior and prognosis in estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) breast cancer. However, the impact of PR status on inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) has not been studied. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to investigate the influence of PR on IBC. Patients with ER+ and HER2-negative IBC were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Pearson’s χ2 test was used to compare the clinicopathological characteristics between patients with estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive (ER+/PR +) and patients with estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-negative (ER+/PR−). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the effects of PR status on the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) in IBC. Overall, 1553 patients including 1157 (74.5%) patients with ER+/PR+ and 396 (25.5%) patients with ER+/PR− were analyzed in our study. The patients with ER+/PR− were more likely to be high histological grade (p < 0.001) and liver metastasis (p = 0.045) compared to patients with ER+/PR+. Despite higher chance of receiving chemotherapy (83.6% vs 77.3%, P = 0.008), patients with ER+/PR− showed worse BCSS (5-year BCSS rate, 34.3% vs 51.3%, P < 0.001) and OS (5-year OS rate, 31.3% vs 46.1%, P < 0.001) compared with ER+/PR+ phenotype. Multivariate survival analysis showed that patients with ER+/PR− still had worse BCSS (hazard ratios [HR]: 1.764, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.476–2.109, P < 0.001) and OS (HR: 1.675, 95% CI 1.411–1.975, P < 0.001) than ER+/PR+ phenotype. Furthermore, patients with ER+/PR− showed worse outcomes than ER+/PR+ phenotype in most subgroups, especially in patients with younger age (≤ 60 years), lower histological grade, lymph node involved and distant metastasis. Patients with ER+/PR− had more aggressive biological behaviors and worse outcomes than patients with ER+/PR+ in IBC. Stronger treatments maybe needed for IBC patients with ER+/PR−.

Higher 10-Year Survival with Breast-Conserving Therapy over Mastectomy for Women with Early-Stage (I-II) Breast Cancer: Analysis of the CDC Patterns of Care Data Base.

Studies in the United States are scarce that assess the survival differences between breast-conserving surgery plus radiation (Breast-Conserving Therapy; BCT) and mastectomy groups using population-based data while accounting for sociodemographic and clinical factors that affect the survival of women with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC). To assess whether BCT provides superior long-term overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) compared with mastectomy in women with ESBC, while considering key factors that impact survival. Cohort study. We analyzed data on women aged 20 years and older diagnosed with stage I-II breast cancer (BC) in 2004 who received either BCT or mastectomy. The data were collected by 5 state cancer registries through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded Patterns of Care study. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models, accounting for sociodemographic and clinical factors, were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analysis involved optimal caliper propensity score (PS) matching to address residual confounding. Of the 3495 women, 41.5% underwent mastectomy. The 10-year OS and BCSS were 82.7% and 91.1% for BCT and 72.3% and 85.7% for mastectomy, respectively. Adjusted models showed that mastectomy recipients had a 22% higher risk of all-cause deaths (ACD) (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = [1.06, 1.41]) and a 26% higher risk of breast cancer-specific deaths (BCD) (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = [1.02, 1.55]) than BCT recipients. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that mastectomy was associated with a higher risk of ACD (P < .05) but did not exhibit a statistically significant risk for BCD. Women with HR+/HER2+ (luminal B) or invasive ductal carcinoma BC who underwent mastectomy had higher risks of ACD and BCD compared with BCT recipients, while the hazards for ACD in triple-negative BC did not remain significant after adjusting for covariates. ESBC BCT recipients demonstrate superior OS and BCSS compared with mastectomy recipients.

Fatal and non-fatal breast cancers in women targeted by BreastScreen Norway: a cohort study.

Many breast cancer survivors experience anxiety related to dying from their disease even if it is detected at an early stage. We aimed to increase knowledge about fatal and non-fatal breast cancer by describing how histopathological tumour profiles and detection modes were associated with 10-year breast cancer-specific survival. This cohort study included data from women targeted by BreastScreen Norway (aged 50-69) and diagnosed with invasive breast cancer during 1996-2011. Breast cancer was classified as fatal if causing death within 10 years after diagnosis and non-fatal otherwise. We described histopathologic characteristics of fatal and non-fatal cancers, stratified by mode of detection. Recursive partitioning identified subgroups with differing survival profiles. In total, 6.3% of 9954 screen-detected cancers (SDC) were fatal, as were 17.4% of 3205 interval cancers (IC) and 20.9% of 3237 cancers detected outside BreastScreen Norway. Four to five subgroups with differing survival profiles were identified within each detection mode. Women with lymph node-negative SDC or Grade 1-2, node-negative IC without distant metastases had the highest 10-year survival (95-96%). Two subgroups representing 53% of the cohort had excellent (95-96%) 10-year breast cancer-specific survival. Most women with SDC had excellent survival, as did nearly 40% of women diagnosed with IC.