30-day Readmission Rates Research Articles

Efficacy of a Nursing Home Liaison Service In Supporting Early Hospital Discharge For Long-Term Care Facility Residents

Abstract Background Long-term care facility residents (LTCR) are prone to acute illness and hospital admission due to underlying factors including advanced age, chronic comorbidity and increased frailty. A new Nursing Home Liaison (NHL) service (consisting of two advanced practice nurses) commenced recently with the aim of providing early supported discharge for LTCR admitted to hospital. This study aims to describe the efficacy of the NHL service in reducing length of stay (LOS) and readmission rates for LTCR in comparison to data from the year prior to NHL commencement. Methods Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) data was retrospectively obtained for the pre-service group (PSG), consisting of all medically admitted LTCR in 2022. This included demographic data, International Classification of Diseases diagnosis, LOS, and discharge outcome. The same prospective data was obtained by chart review for the service group (SG), for LTCR following the initialization of NHL between September 2023 and March 2024. Unpaired t-test and Chi-squared test was used to determine significant difference between the two groups. Results There were 249 LTCR in the PSG and 171 in the SG. The average age (84 vs 81) and dementia diagnosis rate (60% vs 55%) were similar amongst the two groups. The most common reason for admission in both groups was infection (60% vs 40%). The median LOS was significantly lower for the SG as compared to the PSG (8 vs 6 days, p=0.02). The PSG also had higher seven-day (6.4% vs 4.1% p=0.3) and 30-day (14.5% vs 7.6% p=0.03) readmission rates. Conclusion The introduction of a dedicated NHL service for LTCR has resulted in a significant reduction in hospital LOS and readmission rates. By providing enhanced communication through telehealth review and assistance with advanced care planning, the NHL service effectively bridges the gap between acute and community care, resulting in improved patient flow and delivery of person-centred outcomes.

Introduction of Geriatric Medicine Multidisciplinary Service to Emergency Department

Abstract Background Ireland has an ageing demographic with a significant community dwelling population living with frailty. Identification of frailty at the hospital front door via a Geriatric Emergency Multidisciplinary Service (GEMS) was expanded in October 2023 with the aim to trigger early comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in the Emergency Department (ED)and to ensure that older people with frailty are diverted to the most appropriate services as quickly as possible and, where appropriate, discharged home on the same day. Methods Using Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) cycle framework a screening pathway for all over 75-year-olds who present to ED was established. The service provides screening for frailty and delirium (using 4AT) in the ED with high clinical frailty scores (CFS) or requiring specialist input were selected for CGA. Information was collected on all patients on admission and data was also collected on discharge destination and readmission rates. Results 1308 patients were reviewed since introduction with average age 82.3 years (68-101). 63.6% (832) patients had CGA and 36.4% (476) were screened. Of those who did not have a CGA, 46.1% (185) were not frail with CFS 3 or less. Average CFS was 4.84 and average 4AT score was 2. 46.7% (611) of patients reviewed were discharged from ED with discharge rates increasing from 40.9% (93) in November 2023 to 49.5% (104) in April 2024 and 28-day readmission rates decreasing from 6.87% in April 2023 to 5.98% in March 2024. Conclusion This quality improvement project highlights the impact of GEMS in the ED in reducing admission rates and readmissions. Ongoing areas for improvement include expanding the service to review all patients identified with frailty where possible, and in the future establishing pathways for improved access to community services/supports to further reduce readmission rates and to capture the impact on length of stay.

Building capacity and capability for quality improvement: insights from a nascent regional health system

ObjectivesQuality improvement (QI) is critical in facilitating advancements in patient outcomes, system efficiency and professional growth. This paper aimed to elucidate the underlying rationale and framework guiding JurongHealth Campus (JHC),...

Acceptable outcomes of liver transplantation in uninsured patients under the coverage of a state assistance program.

The lack of health insurance is a major barrier in the access to healthcare even in case of life-saving procedures such as liver transplantation (LT). Concerns about worse outcomes in uninsured patients have also discouraged the evaluation and transplantation of patients without adequate health insurance coverage. The aim of this study is to evaluate outcomes from the largest cohort of uninsured patients who underwent LT with the support of a state payment assistance program (also called charity care). This study included all consecutive patients who underwent LT at a single center from 2002 to 2020. Demographic, clinical, social variables and outcome metrics were collected and compared between insured and uninsured patients. Among a total of 978 LT recipients, 594 had private insurance, 324 government insurance (Medicare/Medicaid), 60 were uninsured and covered under a state charity care program. In the charity care group, there was a higher proportion of Hispanic subjects, single marital status, younger age, and high-MELD score patients. The 1- and 3-year patient survival rates were 89.0% and 81.8% in private insurance patients, 88.8% and 80.1% in government insurance recipients, and 93.3% and 79.6% in those with charity care (p=0.49). There was no difference in graft survival between insured and uninsured patients (p=0.62). The three insurance groups presented similar hospital length-of-stay and 30-day readmission rates. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, uninsured status (charity care) was not associated with worse patient survival (HR:1.23, 95%CI: 0.84-1.80, p=0.29) or graft survival (HR:1.22, 95%CI:0.84-1.78, p=0.29). In conclusion, there was no difference in outcomes after LT between insured and uninsured patients. A charity care program may be an effective tool to mitigate socio-economic disparities in both outcomes and access to LT.

Cardiac thrombus in acute ischemic stroke: impact on endovascular thrombectomy utilization

Cardiac embolism plays a very significant role in acute ischemic strokes (AIS), constituting approximately one-third of cases. The origin of these emboli often stems from intracardiac thrombi in the left atrium or left ventricle. Utilizing the National Readmission Database from 2016 to 2019, we investigate the prevalence of cardiac thrombi in AIS patients and explore their potential correlation with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) utilization, and mortality rates. Among 1,272,456 AIS patients, 0.6% had concurrent cardiac thrombus, with an increasing trend observed over the study period (P value < 0.001). The cardiac thrombus cohort showed a higher prevalence of comorbidities such as congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. After propensity-score matching, groups were well-balanced in terms of baseline characteristics. Patients within the cardiac thrombus cohort experienced a longer hospital stay (median 5 days vs. 3 days), but no significant difference in mortality was noted. Importantly, the cardiac thrombus cohort demonstrated a higher frequency of EVT utilization, suggesting a link to larger vessel occlusions. Despite matching based on atrial fibrillation, the EVT utilization in the cardiac thrombus cohort remained high, highlighting a significant association. While 30-day readmission rates were comparable, cardiac thrombus patients faced a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and hemorrhagic stroke, likely attributed to anticoagulation use. Limitations include potential miscoding in the administrative database and a lack of detailed imaging findings. In conclusion, this study highlights the increased likelihood of EVT in AIS patients with cardiac thrombus, possibly indicative of larger vessel occlusion associated with cardiac thrombus.

Survival After Simple Compared With Radical Hysterectomy for Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

To assess the effect on overall survival of simple hysterectomy with lymph node staging compared with radical hysterectomy with lymph node staging for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with early cervical carcinoma of 2 cm or smaller (stage IA1 with lymphovascular space invasion through IIA1, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging) from 2010 to 2019. After 1:1 propensity score matching, we compared patients who underwent simple hysterectomy with lymph node staging and those with radical hysterectomy with lymph node staging. The variables used for matching were age, tumor size, race and ethnicity, lymphovascular space invasion, year of diagnosis, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score, histology, and surgical approach. The primary outcome was overall survival at the end of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission rate and 30- and 90-day mortality rates. In total, 4,167 patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 2,637 patients (63.3%) underwent radical hysterectomy and lymph node staging and 1,530 patients (36.7%) underwent simple hysterectomy and lymph node staging. After propensity score matching, 1,529 patients in each group were included. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between patients who underwent simple hysterectomy and those who underwent radical hysterectomy (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% CI, 0.91-1.73, P=.17). Subgroup analysis by histology, lymphovascular space invasion, tumor size, and surgical approach did not reveal statistically significant differences in overall survival according to hysterectomy type. The hysterectomy groups also did not significantly differ in 30-day readmission rate (4.6% vs 4.2%, P=.73), 30-day mortality rate (0.1% vs 0%, P=.14), or 90-day mortality rate (0.1% vs 0.1%, P=.93). Patients with low-risk cervical cancer could undergo less radical surgery without a negative effect on their oncologic outcomes.

High inpatient-opioid consumption predicts extended length of hospital stay in patients undergoing spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Opioids are common medications used following spine surgery. However, few studies have assessed the impact of increased inpatient-opioid consumption on outcomes following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The aim of this study was to determine the impact of increased inpatient-opioid consumption on hospital length of stay (LOS) following PSF for AIS. A retrospective cohort study was performed using the Premier Healthcare Database (2016-2017). Adolescent patients (11-17years old) who underwent PSF for AIS, identified using ICD-10-CM coding, were stratified by inpatient MME (morphine milligram equivalent) consumption into Low (< 25th percentile for the cohort), Medium (25-75th percentile), and High (> 75th percentile) cohorts. Demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative procedures, perioperative adverse events (AEs), length of hospital stay (LOS), non-routine discharge rates, cost of admission, and 30-day readmission rates were assessed. A logistic multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the association between inpatient MME consumption and extended LOS. Of the 1042 study patients, 260 (24.9%) had Low-MME consumption, 523 (50.2%) had Medium-MME consumption, and 259 (24.9%) had High-MME consumption. A greater proportion of patients in the High cohort identified as non-Hispanic white (Low: 46.5% vs Medium: 61.4% vs High: 65.3%, p < 0.001), while the proportion of patients reporting any comorbidity did not vary across the cohorts (p = 0.940). The number of post-operative AEs experienced also did not vary across the cohorts (p = 0.629). A greater proportion of patients in the High cohort had an extended LOS (Low: 6.5% vs Medium: 8.6% vs High: 19.7%, p < 0.001), while a greater proportion of patients in the Low cohort had an increased cost of admission (Low: 33.1% vs Medium: 20.3% vs High: 26.6%, p < 0.001). The High cohort had increased 30-day readmission rates relative to the Low and Medium cohorts (Low: 0.8% vs Medium: 0.2% vs High: 1.5%, p = 0.049). Non-routine discharge rates did not vary among the cohorts (p = 0.441). On multivariate analysis, High-MME consumption was significantly associated with extended LOS, while Medium-MME consumption was not [Medium: aOR: 1.48, CI (0.83, 2.74), p = 0.193; High: aOR: 4.43, CI (2.47, 8.31), p < 0.001]. Our study showed that high post-operative-MME consumption was significantly associated with extended LOS in patients undergoing PSF for AIS. In light of these findings, changes to existing protocols that decrease the reliance on opioids for post-operative analgesia are merited to improve patient outcomes and reduce health-care expenditures.

Comparative analysis of readmission rates and outcomes: Sleeve gastrectomy with versus without Nissen fundoplication using a National Database.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure. To study the safety of LSG done with Nissen Fundoplication (NF) in patients affected by obesity and GERD and assess the complication rate. A retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2019. A total of 236111 patients underwent LSG with and without NF. A matched cohort of 1096 without NF and 548 with NF was obtained. The median age of patients was 47 years old. Median length of hospital stay was higher in the LSG with NF group. Median total charge was higher in the LSG with NF group. There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day readmission rates in patients with obesity and GERD who received LSG with NF compared to those who received LSG alone. Complications after both procedures were low, which highlights the safety of both procedures.

Effect of surgeon-patient sex discordance on ventral hernia repair outcomes.

Concordance is an important dimension of the physician-patient relationship that may be linked to health care disparities. The purpose of this study was to determine if sex discordance between surgeon and patient impacts surgical outcomes. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data obtained from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) registry was performed on all patients who underwent ventral hernia repair. Surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infections (SSI), surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI) and 30-day readmission rates were recorded. Female patients operated on by male surgeons have increased odds of having an SSI/SSO (OR 1.099, 95% CI 1.022-1.181), SSOPI (OR 1.156, 95% CI 1.031-1.297), and readmission (OR 1.259, 95% CI 1.128-1.406) when compared to male patients operated on by male surgeons. There was no significant difference in adverse outcomes between patient groups when operated on by female surgeons. Sex discordance between surgeon and patient is associated with increased odds adverse outcomes when male surgeons operate on female patients.

Insights into the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and the Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Predictors for the Length of Stay and Readmission in Chronic Heart Failure Patients.

This study evaluates the prognostic relationship between NLR, PLR, and, in a specific subcohort, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), alongside length of stay (LOS) and 90-day readmission rates in CHF patients, irrespective of heart failure phenotype. A retrospective analysis of 427 CHF admissions (males = 57.84%) was conducted. The mean age of the entire population was 68.48 ± 11.53 years. The average LOS was 8.33 ± 5.26 days, with a readmission rate of 73 visits (17.09%) for 56 patients. The NLR (3.79 ± 3.32) showed a low but positive correlation with the LOS (r = 0.222, p < 0.001). Conversely, the PLR (144.84 ± 83.08) did not demonstrate a significant association with the LOS. The NLR presented a low negative correlation for days until the next admission (r = -0.023, p = 0.048). In a prespecified subanalysis of 323 admissions, the NT-proBNP exhibited a low positive Pearson correlation with the NLR (r = 0.241, p < 0.001) and PLR (r = 0.151, p = 0.006). The impact of the NLR across heart failure phenotypes may suggest the role of systemic inflammation in understanding and managing CHF.

Preoperative Mental Health Disorders Affect Opioid Consumption and Perioperative Complications After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Limited evidence exists regarding the influence of mental health disorders (MHDs) on opioid use and complications after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We aimed to identify the prevalence of common MHDs among patients undergoing anatomic TSA (aTSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA). The Premier Healthcare Database was queried for patients undergoing primary aTSA and rTSA from 2016 to 2020. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, diagnosis codes were used to identify MHDs. Primary outcomes included the prevalence of MHDs, perioperative opioid consumption, and 90-day risk of postoperative complications, revision, and readmission. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to assess 90-day risk of primary endpoints while controlling for potential confounders. Statistical significance was defined as P<.05. From 2016 to 2020, 49,997 of 144,725 (34.55%) patients undergoing primary TSA had at least one diagnosed MHD. The most prevalent were depression (17.03%), anxiety (16.75%), and substance use disorder (10.20%). Patients with a MHD had higher mean hospital costs ($75,984±$43,129 vs $73,316±$39,046, P<.0001), longer mean length of stay (1.95±2.25 days vs 1.61±1.51 days, P<.0001), and higher mean total postoperative opioid use (72.00±231.55 morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs] vs 59.32±127.31 MMEs, P<.0001). Periprosthetic fractures (odds ratio, 1.20; P=.041), dislocation (odds ratio, 1.12; P=.042), and 90-day readmission rates (odds ratio, 1.26; P<.001) were significantly higher among patients with a MHD. This study found that MHDs are associated with significantly increased perioperative opioid consumption, medical and surgical complication rates, and risk of readmission after TSA. Recognition and optimization of MHDs is critical to minimizing complications and opioid consumption after TSA. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].

Local excision vs. proctectomy in patients with ypT0–1 rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy: a propensity score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database

BackgroundWe aimed to evaluate outcomes of organ preservation by local excision (LE) compared to proctectomy following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer.MethodsThis retrospective observational study using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) included patients with locally advanced non-metastatic rectal cancer (ypT0–1 tumors) treated with neoadjuvant therapy between 2004 and 2019. Outcomes of patients who underwent LE or proctectomy were compared. 1:1 propensity score matching including patient demographics, clinical and therapeutic factors was used to minimize selection bias. Main outcome was overall survival (OS).Results11,256 of 318,548 patients were included, 526 (4.6%) of whom underwent LE. After matching, mean 5-year OS was similar between the groups (54.1 vs. 54.2 months; p = 0.881). Positive resection margins (1.2% vs. 0.6%; p = 0.45), pathologic T stage (p = 0.07), 30-day mortality (0.6% vs. 0.6%; p = 1), and 90-day mortality (1.5% vs. 1.2%; p = 0.75) were comparable between the groups. Length of stay (1 vs. 6 days; p < 0.001) and 30-day readmission rate (5.3% vs. 10.3%; p = 0.02) were lower in LE patients. Multivariate analysis of predictors of OS demonstrated male sex (HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.08–1.77; p = 0.009), higher Charlson score (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.29–1.79; p < 0.001), poorly differentiated carcinoma (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.08–2.39; p = 0.02), mucinous carcinoma (HR 3.53, 95% CI 1.72–7.24; p < 0.001), and pathological T1 (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.14–1.84; p = 0.002) were independent predictors of increased mortality. LE did not correlate with worse OS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.42–1.97; p = 0.82).ConclusionOur findings show no overall significant survival difference between LE and total mesorectal excision, including ypT1 tumors. Moreover, patients with poorly differentiated or mucinous adenocarcinomas generally had poorer outcomes, regardless of surgical method.

Compliance of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in emergency and elective colorectal cancer surgery with a perspective from a developing country.

To evaluate compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery protocol of patients undergoing colorectal carcinoma surgery, and to compare its effect on outcomes. The retrospective study was conducted at the Maroof International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan, and comprised data from July 15, 2016, to March 20, 2022, of patients of either gender undergoing elective or emergency colorectal carcinoma surgery. Data included age, gender, tumour site, type of surgery, surgical approach, compliance with each of the 25 components of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, length of hospital stay, surgery duration, 30-day readmission rate and perioperative mortality. Data was analysed using SPSS 23. Of the 96 patients with mean age 50.03±14.86 years (range: 20-79 years), 65(67.7%) were males, 70(72.91%) were aged at least 40 years, and 75(78.12%) underwent elective surgery. Most common tumour site was rectum and sigmoid 49(51%). Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 17(17.7%) patients. No compliance was seen with carbohydrate loading of patients or limiting use of opioids in standard anaesthesia protocol. No nutritional supplementation was started from postoperative day 1. Mean compliance with all the protocol components was 74.9%±37.652 for both elective and emergency cases. Mean duration of surgery was 192.50±75.33 minutes, while mean length of hospital stay was 5.52±1.57 days. Re-admission within 30 days was needed in 2(2.1%) cases. There was no perioperative mortality. Better compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery protocol resulted in better perioperative outcomes.

Early versus delayed necrosectomy in pancreatic necrosis: A population-based cohort study on readmission, healthcare utilization, and in-hospital mortality.

Acute necrotizing pancreatitis is a severe and life-threatening condition. It poses a considerable challenge for clinicians due to its complex nature and the high risk of complications. Several minimally invasive and open necrosectomy procedures have been developed. Despite advancements in treatment modalities, the optimal timing to perform necrosectomy lacks consensus. To evaluate the impact of necrosectomy timing on patients with pancreatic necrosis in the United States. A national retrospective cohort study was conducted using the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients with non-elective admissions for pancreatic necrosis were identified. The participants were divided into two groups based on the necrosectomy timing: The early group received intervention within 48 hours, whereas the delayed group underwent the procedure after 48 hours. The various intervention techniques included endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical necrosectomy. The major outcomes of interest were 30-day readmission rates, healthcare utilization, and inpatient mortality. A total of 1309 patients with pancreatic necrosis were included. After propensity score matching, 349 cases treated with early necrosectomy were matched to 375 controls who received delayed intervention. The early cohort had a 30-day readmission rate of 8.6% compared to 4.8% in the delayed cohort (P = 0.040). Early necrosectomy had lower rates of mechanical ventilation (2.9% vs 10.9%, P < 0.001), septic shock (8% vs 19.5%, P < 0.001), and in-hospital mortality (1.1% vs 4.3%, P = 0.01). Patients in the early intervention group incurred lower healthcare costs, with median total charges of $52202 compared to $147418 in the delayed group. Participants in the early cohort also had a relatively shorter median length of stay (6 vs 16 days, P < 0.001). The timing of necrosectomy did not significantly influence the risk of 30-day readmission, with a hazard ratio of 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.31-1.02, P = 0.06). Our findings show that early necrosectomy is associated with better clinical outcomes and lower healthcare costs. Delayed intervention does not significantly alter the risk of 30-day readmission.

Machine Learning-Based Predictions of Mortality and Readmission in Type 2 Diabetes Patients in the ICU

Prognostic outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes in the intensive care unit (ICU), including mortality and readmission rates, are critical for informed clinical decision-making. Although existing research has established a link between type 2 diabetes and adverse outcomes in the ICU, the potential of machine learning techniques for enhancing predictive accuracy has not been fully realized. This study seeks to develop and validate predictive models employing machine learning algorithms to forecast mortality and 30-day post-discharge readmission rates among ICU type 2 diabetes patients, thereby enhancing predictive accuracy and supporting clinical decision-making. Data were extracted and preprocessed from the MIMIC-III database, focusing on 14,222 patients with type 2 diabetes and their corresponding ICU admission records. Comprehensive information, including vital signs, laboratory results, and demographic characteristics, was utilized. Six machine learning algorithms—bagging, AdaBoost, GaussianNB, logistic regression, MLP, and SVC—were developed and evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation to predict mortality at 3 days, 30 days, and 365 days, as well as 30-day post-discharge readmission rates. The machine learning models demonstrated strong predictive performance for both mortality and readmission rates. Notably, the bagging and AdaBoost models showed superior performance in predicting mortality across various time intervals, achieving AUC values up to 0.8112 and an accuracy of 0.8832. In predicting 30-day readmission rates, the MLP and AdaBoost models yielded the highest performance, with AUC values reaching 0.8487 and accuracy rates of 0.9249. The integration of electronic health record data with advanced machine learning techniques significantly enhances the accuracy of mortality and readmission predictions in ICU type 2 diabetes patients. These models facilitate the identification of high-risk patients, enabling timely interventions, improving patient outcomes, and demonstrating the significant potential of machine learning in clinical prediction and decision support.

Transitions of Care From Hospital to Home: Can Continuous Glucose Monitoring Improve Outcomes for Patients With Diabetes?

The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of continuous blood glucose monitoring (CGM) on transitions of care as patients with diabetes are discharged from the hospital on insulin. This is a descriptive study with 2 cohorts of patients (transition to home with CGM and transition to home without CGM) who were assessed prior to discharge (baseline) and 30 days post discharge (follow-up). The key outcome measures were satisfaction with diabetes management, diabetes-related quality of life, frequency of blood glucose monitoring, and 30-day readmission rates. Patients in the CGM group reported significantly higher levels of satisfaction with diabetes self-care management and higher levels of diabetes-related quality of life compared to those patients discharged without CGM. The results of this study suggest that CGM enables a smoother transition from hospital to home for patients with diabetes placed on insulin at discharge. CGM was associated with higher satisfaction and diabetes-related quality of life, perhaps as a result of timely, ongoing information about glucose levels without the burden and pain of finger sticks. CGM may provide greater confidence in self-care decisions regarding insulin dosing, food intake, and exercise. Further research is needed to confirm our results and explore the additional factors associated with greater quality of life and satisfaction.

Heterogeneity in the surgical approach to recurrent abdominal wall hernias: an opportunity for quality improvement.

Despite being a challenging and morbid clinical problem, operative approaches to recurrent abdominal wall hernia repairs receive little attention. Given this, we performed a retrospective study to evaluate surgical techniques of recurrent abdominal wall hernias requiring reoperation. Adult patients from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Core Optimization Hernia Registry (MSQC-COHR) were included in this study. All elective ventral hernia operations performed between January 1, 2020, and March 31, 2023, were included. Descriptive analyses via t-tests and Fisher exact tests were conducted to evaluate sociodemographic, operative, and hernia-specific attributes associated with primary and recurrent hernia repairs. We identified 8587 patients who underwent elective abdominal wall hernia repair. Of these, 7887 (91.8%) underwent primary repair, and 700 (8.2%) underwent recurrent repair. Patients who underwent recurrent hernia repair were older (mean age 57.9years vs. 54.1years, p < 0.001), more often female (53.8% vs. 41.9%, p < 0.001), and had higher BMI (34.0 vs. 32.6, p < 0.001). Patients with recurrent hernias were more likely to have comorbid conditions including hypertension (p < 0.001), diabetes (p < 0.005), COPD (p < 0.01), and BMI > 40 (p < 0.05). Recurrent hernia repairs were more likely to have any 30-day complication (6.4% versus 1.9%, p < 0.001), including higher rates of all surgical site infections. There was no difference in 30-day readmission rates. Considerable variation persists in operative management of recurrent abdominal wall hernias. Importantly, not all recurrent hernias were managed with mesh, which may precipitate additional recurrences and further morbidity. Understanding outcomes for these varied approaches to recurrent hernia repairs is critical to optimize management of this complex clinical problem and prevent future episodes of recurrence.

Clinical Outcomes in Relation to Total Hospital Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Volumes.

There is a paucity of data regarding the relationship between overall hospital volumes for total aortic valve replacement (AVR; transcatheter AVR [TAVR] or surgical AVR [SAVR]) and patient outcomes. We queried the 2019 Nationwide Readmission Database for patients undergoing AVR. Based on procedural volumes of TAVR or SAVR, we classified hospitals as high (≥50th percentile) or low (<50th percentile) volume centers and categorized hospitals as high TAVR/high SAVR, high TAVR/low SAVR, high SAVR/low TAVR, and low TAVR/low SAVR. Multivariable regression models were employed. The main study outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission after total AVR. Our final analysis included 72 123 patients undergoing AVR at 400 hospitals across the United States. The median (interquartile range) hospital procedural volumes for total AVR, TAVR, and SAVR were 137 (86-210), 82 (50-127), and 56 (31-87) procedures, respectively. There was an inverse correlation between hospital procedural volumes of AVR, TAVR, or SAVR and in-hospital mortality after total AVR but not with 30-day readmission. Using high TAVR/high SAVR hospitals as reference, there was higher in-hospital mortality after total AVR among low TAVR/low SAVR hospitals (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.29 [95% CI, 1.07-1.56]) but similar in-hospital mortality among high TAVR/low SAVR hospitals and low TAVR/high SAVR volumes. There was no difference in 30-day readmission rates after total AVR among the 4 hospital categories. Nationwide data revealed that in-hospital mortality after total AVR (SAVR or TAVR) is inversely related to hospital total volumes of AVR. Patients with aortic stenosis have better outcomes if they are managed among experienced centers with high case volumes of both TAVR and SAVR.

Conquering the common bile duct: outcomes in minimally invasive transcystic common bile duct exploration versus ERCP.

Given the increasing interest for surgeons to reclaim the common bile duct in managing choledocholithiasis, there is a growing movement to perform common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Advantages of concomitant CBDE with cholecystectomy include fewer anesthetic events and decreased length of stay. As there is a paucity of literature evaluating the use of the robotic platform for CBDE, our study aims to compare intraoperative and post-operative outcomes between robotic-assisted one-stage and two-stage management of choledocholithiasis. A retrospective chart review was performed from May 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023, identifying patients with choledocholithiasis who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy and transcystic CBDE with choledochoscopy (one-stage management). Preoperative, intraoperative, and post-operative variables were compared to a control group of subjects with choledocholithiasis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with pre- or post-operative ERCP (two-stage management). Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, Student's T, or Mann-Whitney test. Fifty-three subjects who underwent one-stage management and 101 subjects who underwent two-stage management met inclusion criteria. Groups had similar demographics and medical history. Time to CBD clearance (45.2h vs 47.0h, p = .036), total length of stay (3.9days vs 5.1days, p = .007), fluoroscopy time (70.3s vs 151.4s, p < .001), and estimated radiation dose (23.0mSv vs 40.3mSv, p = .002) were significantly lower in the one-stage group compared to two-stage. Clearance rates, complication rates, and 30-day readmission rates were similar for both groups. Total length of stay and radiation exposure remained significantly lower on subanalysis comparing one-stage management to two-stage management with ERCP either before or after cholecystectomy. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy with transcystic common bile duct exploration via choledochoscopy is a safe and feasible option in the management of choledocholithiasis. It offers a shorter time to duct clearance, shorter length of stay, and less radiation exposure when compared to two-stage management.

Assessment of mechanical bowel preparation prior to nephrectomy in the minimally invasive surgery era: insights from a national database analysis in the United States.

This study was performed to evaluate the association between mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) and perioperative outcomes following nephrectomy in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) era. All partial and radical nephrectomies between 2019 and 2021 from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were evaluated. Thirty-day perioperative outcomes were compared between groups where MBP was performed vs. not, in both the MIS and open surgery (OS) cohorts. A propensity score matching technique was utilized within MIS cases to control for covariates. The chi-square and t tests were used to determine significance. A total of 11,869 cases met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Of these, 8,204 (69.1%; comprising 65.3% robotic and 34.7% laparoscopic) underwent MIS, while 3,655 (30.9%) underwent OS. The rate of MBP was higher in the MIS group (16.0% vs. 10.0%, p < 0.001). Within the MIS group, MBP was associated with reduced rates of postoperative ileus (0.9% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.02), while other complications were comparable. Propensity score matching showed no association between MBP and postoperative ileus. However, a lower rate of 30-day readmission in the MBP group became statistically significant (4.4% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.01). Conversely, patients in the MBP group also demonstrated higher rates of pneumonia (1.29% vs. 0.46%, p = 0.002) and pulmonary embolism (0.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.001) after matching. MBP practice prior to nephrectomy is infrequent in both OS and MIS cases, with minor differences in perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing MIS. Routine MBP should continue to be excluded from the standard of care for nephrectomy in the MIS era.