Objective(s)Cancer patients who receive radiation therapy to the thorax often develop radiation-induced heart disease (RIHD) decades later. Prior chest radiation is associated with elevated perioperative risk of complications and mortality following cardiac surgery. Whether the type of valve (mechanical vs. bioprosthetic) used affects outcomes in patients with RIHD is unknown. MethodsThis retrospective review analyzed the characteristics and post-operative outcomes of patients with a prior history of chest radiation for Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma who underwent surgical valve replacement at a single institution between 2000 and 2021. Both 30-day peri-operative outcomes and long-term survival were assessed. ResultsMechanical valve patients tended to be younger, have more valves replaced, and have undergone prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) than bioprosthetic valve recipients. Valve type alone did not alter perioperative complications or overall survival. Median survival was 11.0 years in mechanical and 10.9 years in bioprosthetic valve patients (P = 0.930). Twelve patients underwent valve reinterventions (6 mechanical, 6 bioprosthetic), and three underwent transplant. Single valve (AV or MV) recipients fared better with median survival of 13.3 years compared to 6.2 years in those who underwent combined AVR+MVR (P<0.0001). ConclusionsPatients with RIHD who undergo surgical valve replacement have similarly suboptimal short- and long-term outcomes regardless of mechanical vs. bioprosthetic valve type. Those who required combined aortic and mitral valve replacement had especially high 10-year overall mortality. Further investigation in a larger dataset including transcatheter approaches is warranted.
Read full abstract