Abstract

The Acts of the Apostles is a relevant New Testament document for discussing fearless speech (parrēsia) in early Christianity. According to Michel Foucault, parrēsia is a verbal activity that ultimately constitutes a philosophical attitude, namely, the parrēsiastic attitude, in which the speaker is bound to his/her utterances and their risky consequences. More precisely, Foucault’s concept of parrēsia is framed by the notions of frankness rather than persuasion, truth instead of silence, courage in contrast to fear, criticism instead of praise, and moral duty in opposition to self-interest. This multifaceted definition of parrēsia seems to provide a heuristic framework of reference for exploring fearless speech in Acts. However, it is unclear whether this framework, which results from Foucault’s problematisation of Greek parrēsia, properly captures the picture of parrēsia in the narrative of Acts. The present article critically engages with Foucault’s multifaceted conception of parrēsia. Comparatively, it evaluates how parrēsia is similar to and different from expressions of fearless speech observed in the use of parrēsia in Acts.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.