Abstract
Why do we foster and grant wrong innovative scientific methods? The Neuroscientific Challenge
Highlights
Scientific Innovators face with several problems because of the novelty of their ideas or related methods
We analyse how EU flagship Human Brain Project (HBP) was overestimated as a successful innovative project and, on the other side, how other innovative ways to work on neuroscientific research have led the discipline to important dead-end epistemological results
It looks clear that there are several ways to achieve scientific innovation despite of the still dominating linear model
Summary
Scientific Innovators face with several problems because of the novelty of their ideas or related methods. We analyse how EU flagship Human Brain Project (HBP) was overestimated as a successful innovative project and, on the other side, how other innovative ways to work on neuroscientific research (fMRI, statistical data analysis) have led the discipline to important dead-end epistemological results. To be innovative is a problem for the researcher who is addressing new results into the academic community.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
