Abstract

The term, equation of differences , denotes the equation for the squared differences of the roots of a given equation; the equation of differences afforded a means of determining the number of real roots, and also limits for the real roots, of a given numerical equation, and was upon this account long ago sought for by geometers. In the Philosophical Transactions for 1763, Waring gives, but without demonstration or indication of the mode of obtaining it, the equation of differences for an equation of the fifth order wanting the second term: the result was probably obtained by the method of symmetric functions. This method is employed in the ‘Meditationes Algebraicæ’ (1782), where the equation of differences is given for the equations of the third and fourth orders wanting the second terms; and in p. 85 the before-mentioned result for the equation of the fifth order wanting the second term, is reproduced. The formulæ for obtaining by this method the equation of differences, are fully developed by Lagrange in the 'Traité des Equations Numériques’ (1808); and he finds by means of them the equation of differences for the equations of the orders two and three, and for the equation of the fourth order wanting the second term; and in Note III. he gives, after Waring, the result for the equation of the fifth order wanting the second term. It occurred to me that the equation of differences could be most easily calculated by the following method. The coefficients of the equation of differences, quá functions of the differences of the roots of the given equation, are leading coefficients of covariants, or (to use a shorter expression) they are “Seminvariants," that is, each of them is a function of the coefficients which is reduced to zero by one of the two operators which reduce an invariant to zero. In virtue of this property they can be calculated, when their values are known for the particular case in which one of the coefficients of the given equation is zero. To fix the ideas, let the given equation be (*)( v , 1) n =0; then, when the last coefficient or constant term vanishes, the equation breaks up into v =0 and into an equation of the degree ( n –1), which I call the reduced equation; the equation of differences will break up into two equations, one of which is the equation of differences for the reduced equation, the other is the equation for the squares of the roots of the same reduced equation. This hardly requires a proof; let the roots of the given equation be α, β, γ, δ, &c., those of the equation of differences are (α–β) 2 , (α–γ) 2 , (α–δ) 2 , &c., (β–γ) 2 , (β–δ) 2 , (γ–δ) 2 , &c.; but in putting the constant term equal to zero, we in effect put one of the roots, say α, equal to zero; the roots of the equation of differences thus become ( β 2 , γ 2 , δ 2 , &c., ( β - γ ) 2 , ( β - δ ) 2 , ( γ - δ ) 2 , &c. The equation for the squares of the roots can be found without the slightest difficulty; hence if the equation of differences for the reduced equation of the order ( n — 1) is known, we can, by combining it with the equation for the squares of the roots, form the equation of differences for the given equation with the constant term put equal to zero, and thence by the above-mentioned property of the Seminvariancy of the coefficients, find the equation of differences for the given equation. The present memoir shows the application of the process to equations of the orders two, three, four, and five: part of the calculation for the equation of the fifth order was kindly performed for me by the Rev. R. Harley. It is to be noticed that the best course is to apply the method in the first instance to the forms ( a, b , ..)( v , 1) n = 0, without numerical coefficients (or, as they may be termed, the denumera forms ), and to pass from the results so obtained to those which belong to the forms ( a, b , ..)( v , 1) n = 0, or standard forms . The equation of differences, for (α - β) 2 , &c., the coefficients of which are seminvariants, naturally leads to the consideration of a more general equation having for its roots (α - β) 2 (x - γy) 2 (x - δy) 2 &c., the coefficients of which are covariants; and in fact, when, as for equations of the orders two, three, and four, all the covariants are known, such co variant equation can be at once formed from the equation of differences; for equations of the fifth order, however, where the covariants are not calculated beyond a certain degree, only a few of the coefficients of the covariant equation can be thus at once formed. At the conclusion of the memoir, I show how the equation of differences for an equation of the order n can be obtained by the elimination of a single quantity from two equations each of the order n — 1; and by applying to these two equations the simplification which I have made in Bezout’s abridged method of elimination, I exhibit the equation of differences for the given equation of the order in a compendious form by means of a determinant; the first-mentioned method is, however, that which is best adapted for the actual development of the equation of differences for the equation of a given order.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call