Abstract
The undertaking of peer institution assessment potentially benefits an institution and happens frequently; however, it does not directly provide useful information to individual programs within an institution. The authors in this article discuss the importance of peer programs evaluation and demonstrate, through two case studies, how data from both the Communication Sciences and Disorders Education (CSDE) survey and the EdFind database can be used to conduct a peer program evaluation in an academic program in speech-language pathology. The benefits of using both sources are discussed, as well as how they can assist a program to determine its efficiency and look for opportunities for improvements and growth.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
