Abstract

During the past 30 year of economic growth, China has also accumulated a huge environmental pollution debt. China’s government attempts to use a variety of means, including tax instruments to control environmental pollution. After nine years of repeated debates, the State Council Legislative Affairs Office released the Environmental Protection Tax Law (Draft) in June 2015. As China’s first environmental tax law, whether this conservative “Environmental Fee to Tax (EFT)” reform could improve the environment has generated controversy. In this paper, we seek insights to this controversial issue using the machine learning approach, a powerful tool for environmental policy assessment. We take Hubei Province, the first pilot area as a case of EFT, and analyze the institutional incentive, behavior transformation and emission intensity reduction performance. Twelve pilot cities located in Hubei Province were selected to estimate the effect of the reform by using synthetic control and a rapid developing machine learning method for policy evaluation. We find that the EFT reform can promote emission intensity reduction. Especially, relative to comparable synthetic cities in the absence of the reform, the average annual emission intensity of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) in the pilot cities dropped by 0.13 ton/million Yuan with a reduction rate of 10%–32%. Our findings also show that the impact of environmental tax reform varies across cities due to the administrative level and economic development. The results of our study are also supported by enterprise interviews. The EFT improves the overall environmental costs, and encourages enterprises to reduce emissions pollution. These results provide valuable experience and policy implications for the implementation of China’s Environmental Protection Tax Law.

Highlights

  • Frequent large-scale environmental disasters, such as haze and water pollution, have raised concerns among researchers and the public [1]

  • Effect of Environmental Fee to Tax (EFT) reform is measured by the difference in SO2 emission intensity between each pilot city and its synthetic control city

  • Based on 27 enterprises interview in Hubei Province, this study shows that all enterprises claimed that, after EFT, the environmental protection departments have strengthened their supervision, increasing the cost of the overall environment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Frequent large-scale environmental disasters, such as haze and water pollution, have raised concerns among researchers and the public [1]. Such social pressure forces the government to actively explore new instruments of governance to control environmental pollutions [2,3], and employ new methods such as machine learning to evaluate its policies. Environmental tax reform has spread to developing countries in Asia [9]. Hubei Province has experienced a process of high growth and high pollution since 2004. From 2008 to present, GDP growth rate in Hubei Province has been higher than the average level in other regions of the country. Hubei Province’s collection of pollutant discharge fees was inadequate for a long time, and the effect of pollution emission reduction was not good [10]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call