Abstract
Based on a panel ARDL (AutoRegressive Distributed Lag) model, this paper investigates the environmental and economic consequences of energy tax levied in the four Nordic countries and the G7 countries from 1994 to 2016. Based on the double dividend theory of environmental tax, this paper investigates five variables: energy tax, energy consumption per unit of GDP, income tax, profit tax and capital gains tax, carbon dioxide intensity and fossil fuel burning ratio. A panel ARDL model is established to empirically test the relationship between energy tax and other variables. Experiments show that both the four Nordic countries and the G7 countries have found the existence of green dividends in the long run: the green dividends of the four Nordic countries are reflected in the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions, while those of the G7 countries are reflected in the reduction of fossil fuel use. In terms of blue dividends, the implementation of energy tax in the four Nordic countries can not only reduce distorted taxes in the short term, but also promote economic growth and adjust tax structure in the long term. For the G7 countries, blue dividends are not reflected in the long term. The model used in this paper is a panel ARDL model, which is more suitable for the study of multiple countries, multiple variables and long-term cycles. This model has been seldomly used in previous studies. The application of the panel ARDL model in this paper is not only more scientific and applicable, but also more innovative, which makes up for the shortcomings of previous studies. The research object of this paper selects the energy tax, which is an important part of the environmental tax system, and strives to provide a reference for the implementation of environmental taxation priorities and effects through empirical research. This paper may also serve as a reference for other countries to establish and improve environmental tax. As the first environmental tax law in China, the Environmental Protection Tax Law of the People’s Republic of China was formally implemented on 1 January 2018. This paper chooses G7 countries and Nordic countries as the research objects. As these are important economies in the world, their environmental tax implementation is more perfected and has strong representativeness. This study can provide some experience for the continuous improvement of China’s environmental tax law.
Highlights
Energy is the foundation of economic development, and fossil energy sources such as coal, oil and natural gas are traditional and widely used forms of energy input and consumption
This paper aims to use panel ARDL model to empirically analyze the relationship between energy tax (ET), energy consumption per unit of GDP (GDP), income tax, profit tax and capital gains tax (IPC), fossil fuel combustion ratio (FFC) and carbon dioxide intensity (CO2) in the G7 and the four Nordic countries
In order to better explore the role of energy tax, and even environmental tax, this paper proposes the following two hypotheses based on the double dividend hypothesis: H1: Under the same conditions, energy tax can adjust the energy structure, reduce the burning of fossil fuels, reduce carbon dioxide emissions, improve the ecological environment and realize the green dividend
Summary
Energy is the foundation of economic development, and fossil energy sources such as coal, oil and natural gas are traditional and widely used forms of energy input and consumption. Considering the limited nature of fossil energy reserves, such contemporary excessive use means that the future usability will be reduced, which will produce cross-generational negative externalities, resulting in user costs in an economic sense. In addition to continuously improving energy efficiency and developing new energy technologies, human beings should be more cautious about the depletion of fossil energy, balance the dependence on fossil energy and fully consider the use of fiscal instruments such as taxation to promote energy production and consumption change. Green GNP, green accounting, green marketing, green tax and other concepts have emerged one after another These “green” concepts reflect people’s attention to the environment, and bring the consumption and compensation of environmental resources into the economic category, which is conducive to the solution of environmental problems
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
