Abstract

Near the Tono Research Institute of Earthquake Science (TRIES), Mizunami City, Gifu, two 500 m- deep shafts with diameters of 4.5 m and 6.5 m were excavated by the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA). The 6.5 m shaft is crossed by an NNW-trending geological fault (NNW fault), which has a right-lateral strike-slip component and a dip-slip component. Since before the excavation TRIES has been performing observations by a comprehensive set of borehole crustal activity observation devices in deep boreholes and extensometers in a vault near the shafts to observe variations in, for example, strain, tilt, and groundwater level continuously. During the shaft excavation, groundwater inflow to the shafts was encountered. The water was twice pumped out. During the pumping and non-pumping periods, TRIES’s observation data such as the groundwater level, the strain, and the tilt showed anomalous variations. The analysis of them revealed relationships among the groundwater level, the fault, the strain and the tilt. Strain analysis of TGR350 borehole station showed that the direction of the maximum shear strain was parallel to strike of the NNW fault. In addition, when the water in the shafts was being pumped out, the groundwater level at TGR350 declined and the maximum shear strain showed a right-lateral strike-slip movement in the NNW direction. When pumping was paused, the groundwater level increased, and the maximum shear strain showed a left-lateral strike-slip movement in the NNW direction. On the other hand, strain analysis of TGR165 borehole station showed different behavior from that of TGR350 borehole station deeper than TGR165. Tilt analysis of TGR165 borehole station showed tilt changes nearly perpendicular to strike of the NNW fault corresponding to the pumping and the non-pumping periods. Tilt analysis of TGR350 borehole station showed tilt changes of E-W direction with much smaller amplitude than that of TGR165. Behavior of the strain and the tilt during the pumping and non-pumping periods can be attributed in part to differences in the response of the medium to groundwater fluctuations, due to differences in the number and distribution characteristics of the fractures in the medium where the observation instruments are installed. We also discussed the observation results from the viewpoint of poroelasticity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call