Abstract

AbstractDrawing from four case studies of dialogue groups between Turkish American and Armenian American communities organized over the past decade, this article examines the political value of grassroots diplomacy. In particular, it questions the emphasis on the transfer‐up paradigm prevalent in the literature of conflict resolution, which is premised on the ultimate importance of governmental structures in brokering a resolution. Instead, the article focuses on the role that grassroots communities can play in civil society development between two communities as an alternate pathway toward conflict resolution and reconciliation. The article also takes up the dilemma that dialogue groups face: to promote a resolution to a conflict versus advancing social justice and human rights. The article concludes with a set of theoretical and policy recommendations.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.