Abstract
The concept of evaluating multiple alternative models to determine ecological response form is over a century old and is ever more relevant as modern computing power allows ever more complicated models to be routinely used but often without a reasonable model verification process, particularly in fields where the ecological conceptual model is still developing. The emphasis for developing a statistical model is to test the validity of the hypothesis represented by the model. We present a framework of model identification and evaluation that includes exploratory data analysis and model diagnostics and evaluation. This framework emphasizes the importance of evaluating multiple alternative models when evaluating the validity of the model. This process is illustrated by using a model-building problem for quantifying the stream ecological response to urbanization using a data set from a large ecological study designed to understand how stream ecosystems respond to urbanization. The paper focuses on the question of whether a threshold model is appropriate, and demonstrates the importance of evaluating multiple alternative models in the detection of ecological thresholds, and illustrates how choosing an inappropriate model can lead to erroneous conclusion regarding the existence of thresholds.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.