Abstract
Objective Comparing gastric perforation repair with traditional contrast,to explore the feasibility and superiority of the laparoscopic gastric perforation repair.Methods 68 cases were randomly divided into two groups for laparoscopic gastric perforation repair and traditional repair,then compared two groups of treatment.Results Both operations were successful ( including laparoscopic repair in 34 cases) and surgery time,blood loss,postoperative drainage,length of stay,and cosmetic results of the comparison.Conclusion Compared with the traditional open surgery,the laparoscopic surgery had less trauma,leas pain,faster recovery,shorter hospital stay,high efficacy and good cosmetic results and other advantages. Key words: Duodenal diseases; Reconstructive surgical procedures; Laparoscopes
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
