Time‐gated fluorescence lifetime imaging and microvolume spectroscopy using two‐photon excitation

Abstract

A scanning microscope utilizing two‐photon excitation in combination with fluorescence lifetime contrast is presented. The microscope makes use of a tunable femtosecond titanium:sapphire laser enabling the two‐photon excitation of a broad range of fluorescent molecules, including UV probes. Importantly, the penetration depth of the two‐photon exciting (infra)red light is substantially greater than for the corresponding single‐photon wavelength while photobleaching is significantly reduced.The time structure of the Ti:Sa laser can be employed in a straightforward way for the realization of fluorescence lifetime imaging. The fluorescence lifetime is sensitive to the local environment of the fluorescent molecule. This behaviour can be used for example to quantify concentrations of ions, such as pH and Ca2+, or pO2 and pCO2. In the set‐up presented here the fluorescence lifetime imaging is accomplished by time‐gated single photon counting.The performance and optical properties of the microscope are investigated by a number of test measurements on fluorescent test beads. Point‐spread functions calculated from measurements on 230‐nm beads using an iterative restoration procedure compare well with theoretical expectations.Lifetime imaging experiments on a test target containing two different types of test bead in a fluorescent buffer all with different lifetimes (2.15 ns, 2.56 ns and 3.34 ns) show excellent quantitative agreement with reference values obtained from time correlated single photon counting measurements. Moreover, the standard deviation in the results can be wholly ascribed to the photon statistics.Measurements of acridine orange stained biofilms are presented as an example of the potential of two‐photon excitation combined with fluorescence lifetime contrast. Fluorescence lifetime and intensity images were recorded over the whole sample depth of 100 μm. Fluorescence intensity imaging is seriously hampered by the rapid decrease of the fluorescence signal as a function of the depth into the sample. Fluorescence lifetime imaging on the other hand is not affected by the decrease of the fluorescence intensity.