Abstract

“Thin political markets” are the processes through which some of the most complex and critical institutions of our capitalist system are determined—e.g., our accounting-standards infrastructure. In thin political markets, corporate managers are largely unopposed—because of their own expertise and the general public's low awareness of the issues. This enables managers to structure the “rules of the game” in self-serving ways. The result is a structural f aw in the determination of critical institutions of our capitalist system, which, if ignored, can undermine the legitimacy of the system. This article provides some ideas on how to fix the problem.

Highlights

  • Abstract “Thin political markets” are the processes through which some of the most complex and critical institutions of our capitalist system are determined – e.g., our accounting-standards infrastructure

  • Out of the day-to-day eye of even most businesspersons, accounting rules are essential to defining and measuring fundamental notions such as “profits” and “assets.” The efficient allocation of capital and the effective evaluation of investments in a market economy depend in part on the nature of accounting rules

  • Just as industry titans are heralded in business school classrooms and on the covers of Fortune and Forbes for their commercial acumen, so too must they be celebrated for their public leadership in thin political markets

Read more

Summary

Published Version Citable link Terms of Use

It was only to be expensed when managers of acquiring firms determined via fair-value estimates that it had lost value.[5] a multi-trillion dollar industry where long-term performance measurement is key to ensuring that value is not destroyed ends up with accounting rules that seem inconsistent with even basic tenets of what constitutes a profit. In particular, the auditing rule that deals with auditors’ responsibilities on the kinds of fair-value estimates managers have to make when accounting for goodwill from M&A This rule – known to insiders as “SAS 101” – creates broad insulation from liability for the auditors involved, provided they follow a pre-specified protocol of actions. This is what I refer to as the problem of thin political markets

Understanding thin political markets
Engineering change in thin political markets
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.