Abstract
The article examines some of the key features of the scientific work of Douglass North. It is argued that the popular image of North as an adherent of this or that school of economic thought is not highly relevant. The authors believe that one of the key features of North's research style is his "theory-centricity". The article demonstrates that the most important milestones in North's career (fling with Marxism in his youth, participation in the Сliometrics revolution, the transition from neoclassical economist to one of the founders of neo-institutionalism, a turn towards cognitive science), despite the seeming lack of continuity served as kind of steps of the ladder along which North went to the creation of a comprehensive theory of social development. Based on the results of qualitative content analysis of North's works of the 1950s and 60s, the authors show that even in the years of his affinity for quantitative economic history, the economist always put the ability to theorize above the skills of quantitative analysis. This feature, combined with the recent empirical turn in economics, which raised the prestige of empirical work to unprecedented heights, made it difficult for modern mainstream economists to perceive the ideas of the "late" North. The authors' analysis of the citation structure of North's last major book, "Violence and Social Orders. Conceptual framework for the interpretation of the written history of mankind" confirms this trend. This book generates greater interest among heterodox economists, historians, and political scientists than among representatives of mainstream economics. In the article's conclusion, the authors speculate about the prospects of the Northian theory-driven style of doing economic research in the face of the progressive "empirization" of modern economics.
Highlights
В статье рассматриваются некоторые особенности научного творчества Дугласа Норта
The article examines some of the key features of the scientific work of Douglass North
It is argued that the popular image of North as an adherent of this or that school of economic thought is not highly relevant
Summary
Based on the results of qualitative content analysis of North's works of the 1950s and 60s, the authors show that even in the years of his affinity for quantitative economic history, the economist always put the ability to theorize above the skills of quantitative analysis. Современные исследователи часто обращают внимание на то, что именно в годы (1961–1966) руководства одним из главных периодических изданий по ЭИ – Journal of Economic History – дуумвиратом Норт – Паркер этот журнал стал рупором клиометристов, активно предоставляющим слово авторам статей, испещренных уравнениями и регрессиями (Haupert, 2017: 1065). Причем если не следовать примеру Уэйплса и не считать таблично-графические выкладки достаточным признаком отнесения исследования в категорию клиометрических (тогда клиометристом можно считать, например, шотландского политэконома Уильяма Плейфера, в конце XVIII столетия применившего графическую форму репрезентации статистической информации)[5], то может статься, что у Норта вообще практически отсутствуют количественные работы. Quantitative research in American economic history The state of economic history Growth and welfare in the American past: a new economic history Sources of productivity change in ocean shipping 1600–1850
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.