Abstract

IntroductionTo investigate ultrasonographic features and analyze causes of misdiagnosis of focal fibrocystic change (FC) of the breast. Materials and MethodsThe ultrasonographic features of 95 women (104 lesions) with postoperatively pathologically confirmed focal FC (Group 1) were retrospectively analyzed and compared with those of 105 women (107 lesions) with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (Group 2), and 164 women (177 lesions) with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) (Group 3). ResultsThere were significant differences in 12 features among groups. The sizes and distributions of cystic changes among the groups were significantly different. In group 1, the incidence of cystic changes was 75%(78/104), and the main manifestation was scattered cystic changes (88.5%, 69/78) and microcapsules (81.8%, 63/78). Among focal FC lesions, 36.5% were preoperative BI-RADS classifications 4b-5 (30.8% 4b and 4c). Lesions misdiagnosed as malignant showed solid or cystic solid mixed echoes, and 70.2% of group 1 were irregularly shaped, and 63.5% had unclear edges. In group 1, 5 cases had “hyperechoic halo,” 11.5% (12/104) appeared echo attenuation behind the mass, and 21 cases appeared punctate hyperechoic. ConclusionFC frequently exhibits low heterogeneity, scattered microcapsules with posterior enhancement, “pit-like” or “grid-like” changes, posterior enhancement, rare hyperechoic halo, calcification, and lack of blood supply. Certain focal FC are irregularly shaped with unclear edges, with malignant signs such as crab feet and burr, hyperechoic halo, and calcification, which ultrasound BI-RADS classification may easily misdiagnose as malignant. Local magnification function should be considered, and the internal structure should be carefully observed to prevent misdiagnosis.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call