Abstract

This article advocates an epistemological approach to the notions of traditional, formal, and alternative education, leveraging Reinhard Koselleck’s historical perspective. It begins by analyzing the concept of traditional education, emphasizing its focus on historical continuity, the central role of the teacher, and its association with oligarchic interests.Drawing on Daniel Brailovsky’s theory, the evolution of the traditional form of education is examined, particularly the emergence of the «old new school» and «market scholasticism». The article then shifts to scrutinize formal education in Chile. This is achieved by exploring ministerial documents to discern the defining components of formal education in terms of their alignment with what is deemed «alternative» and «traditional».The concept of alternative education is subsequently broached from a historical viewpoint, underscoring its adaptability and diversity relative to context. This mode of education fosters inclusion, creativity, diversity, and intercultural understanding, although it is confronted with challenges such as uncertainty and issues related to coexistence. Nonetheless, a notable shortfall is the lack of state support for alternative education in Chile, leading to discriminatory practices and a disregard for these types of schools.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.