Abstract
In recent years, with the popularization of higher education, quality problems have become increasingly prominent, and government documents often propose that the main task of education reform and development is to improve the quality of higher education. As a result, teaching evaluations have appeared one after another. Although various evaluation activities are carried out dynamically, expert evaluation has proven to be one of the most effective methods to ensure professional quality. This will help improve the quality of human resource development, promote regional economic development, improve the quality assurance system of higher education, and promote the formation of professional skills development mechanisms. This article studies the teaching evaluation index system and intelligent evaluation methods of vocational undergraduate pilot colleges, understands the relevant knowledge of the teaching evaluation index system on the basis of literature data, and then, constructs the teaching evaluation system of vocational undergraduate pilot colleges. The constructed system is tested, and the test results show that the error of the results of teacher self-evaluation and student evaluation is controlled within the two, which also verifies that the construction of the teaching ability evaluation index system this time is reasonable and scientific.
Highlights
The focus of our country’s professional undergraduate pilot colleges has shifted from accelerating the construction of colleges and universities to strengthening the construction of colors [1, 2]
The existing professional undergraduate pilot colleges are mostly assessed at the macrolevel, including talent training, and lack mature microlevel assessments [3, 4]
Based on the glacier structure theory, the personal qualities and characteristics of teachers are more decisive for their educational behavior, so the measurement system adds a measurement to this part; third, enrich the evaluation questions, enrich the classroom teaching, and emphasize the importance of teacher self-evaluation; fourth, self-selected index adjustment, distinguishing teacher leadership evaluation, and constructing an evaluation index system according to the principles of index system construction described in the previous section
Summary
The focus of our country’s professional undergraduate pilot colleges has shifted from accelerating the construction of colleges and universities to strengthening the construction of colors [1, 2]. Using scientific methods, adapting and promoting the characteristics of new undergraduate colleges and universities, establishing a scientific and fair education evaluation system, and evaluating education levels are effective means of guidance and supervision. Some scholars believe that the use of the same as traditional undergraduate colleges and recent higher education institutions The evaluation model of the evaluation system and methods cannot reflect the characteristics of the newly recruited faculty. It has led to the unification of the school model and the development direction of all universities It is not suitable for the society of higher education development needs and has an adverse impact on the overall development of higher education, it is impossible to understand and guide the development of new departments through evaluation [11]. This article studies the teaching evaluation system and intelligent evaluation methods of vocational undergraduate pilot colleges, analyzes the teaching evaluation and teaching evaluation system construction principles on the basis of literature data, and constructs the teaching evaluation system of vocational colleges, tests the constructed system, and draws relevant conclusions through the test results
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
