Abstract

A well-known conjecture of András Gyárfás and David Sumner states that for every positive integer m and every finite tree T there exists k such that all graphs that do not contain the clique Km or an induced copy of T have chromatic number at most k. The conjecture has been proved in many special cases, but the general case has been open for several decades. The main purpose of this paper is to consider a natural analogue of the conjecture for matroids, where it turns out, interestingly, to be false. Matroids are structures that result from abstracting the notion of independent sets in vector spaces: that is, a matroid is a set M together with a nonempty hereditary collection I of subsets deemed to be independent where all maximal independent subsets of every set are equicardinal. They can also be regarded as generalizations of graphs, since if G is any graph and I is the collection of all acyclic subsets of E(G), then the pair (E(G),I) is a matroid. In fact, it is a binary matroid, which means that it can be represented as a subset of a vector space over F2. To do this, we take the space of all formal sums of vertices and represent the edge vw by the sum v+w. A set of edges is easily seen to be acyclic if and only if the corresponding set of sums is linearly independent. There is a natural analogue of an induced subgraph for matroids: an induced restriction of a matroid M is a subset M′ of M with the property that adding any element of M−M′ to M′ produces a matroid with a larger independent set than M′. The natural analogue of a tree with m edges is the matroid Im, where one takes a set of size m and takes all its subsets to be independent. (Note, however, that unlike with graph-theoretic trees there is just one such matroid up to isomorphism for each m.) Every graph can be obtained by deleting edges from a complete graph. Analogously, every binary matroid can be obtained by deleting elements from a finite binary projective geometry, that is, the set of all one-dimensional subspaces in a finite-dimensional vector space over F2. Finally, the analogue of the chromatic number for binary matroids is a quantity known as the critical number introduced by Crapo and Rota, which in the case of a graph G turns out to be ⌈log2(χ(G))⌉ -- that is, roughly the logarithm of its chromatic number. One of the results of the paper is that a binary matroid can fail to contain I3 or the Fano plane F7 (which is the simplest projective geometry) as an induced restriction, but also have arbitrarily large critical number. By contrast, the critical number is at most two if one also excludes the matroid associated with K5 as an induced restriction. The main result of the paper is a structural description of all simple binary matroids that have neither I3 nor F7 as an induced restriction.

Highlights

  • This paper considers questions from the theory of induced subgraphs in the setting of simple binary matroids

  • The critical number χ(M) of an n-dimensional matroid M = (E, G), is the smallest integer k ≥ 0 such that G − E contains a projective geometry of dimension n − k

  • We show as well that E3 has the curious property of being an inclusion-minimal class that is closed under induced restrictions for which χ is unbounded

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper considers questions from the theory of induced subgraphs in the setting of simple binary matroids. The critical number χ(M) of an n-dimensional matroid M = (E, G), is the smallest integer k ≥ 0 such that G − E contains a projective geometry of dimension n − k. (We have χ(PG(t − 1, 2)) = t and so any matroid containing PG(t − 1, 2) must have χ ≥ t.) The following celebrated graph theory conjecture states that excluding a clique and an induced tree bounds the chromatic number. The class E3, of matroids whose (≥ 3)-dimensional induced restrictions all have even size, arose for us in a negative way, as a source of counterexamples to an attempted proof of the analogue of Conjecture 1.5 This class and related ones turn out to enjoy properties that we believe to be of substantial interest, and a good amount of our work concerns these classes for their own sake. In the vein of Theorems 1.3 and 1.4, we expect them to appear as basic classes in structure theorems, and, since they have unbounded critical number but omit small projective geometries and many other natural matroids, that they will be a good source of counterexamples

Preliminaries
Even matroids and twist doublings
Even plane matroids
The main results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call