Abstract
Abstract Many dative verbs can be seen to have different senses – e.g. give’s prototypical ‘transfer of possession’ sense in to give someone a hat vs. its more abstract ‘cause an effect’ sense in to give someone a heart attack – and it could be the case that these different senses correspond to separate lexical representations, with their own links to syntactic information in memory. This study used syntactic priming to investigate this issue. Experiment 1 showed a “sense boost” to dative priming: Stronger priming was observed when the dative verbs in prime and target sentences were used in the same sense than when they were used in different senses. Experiment 2 showed that, in the absence of sense repetition, form overlap between the head verbs of prime and target sentences still caused a boost to dative priming. Finally, Experiment 3 confirmed that the sense boost observed in Experiment 1 was not caused by a general difference in priming strength between dative prime sentences with literal ‘transfer’ vs. more abstract or figurative meanings: When the target pictures depicted the target verbs’ abstract senses, prime sentences with abstract meanings caused stronger priming than prime sentences describing a concrete transfer. These results suggest that the various senses of dative verbs have separate representations that are linked to the syntactic constructions they can be used in.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call