Abstract

Sentence production relies on the activation of semantic information (e.g., noun animacy) and syntactic frames that specify an order for grammatical functions (e.g., subject before object). However, it is unclear whether these semantic and syntactic processes interact and if this might change over development. We thus examined the extent to which animacy-semantic role mappings in dative prime sentences and target scenes influences choice of syntactic structure (structural priming, analysis 1) and ordering of nouns as a function of animacy (animacy noun priming, analysis 2) in children and adults. One hundred forty-three participants (47 three year olds, 48 five year olds and 48 adults) alternated with the experimenter in describing animations. Animacy mappings for themes and goals were either prototypical or non-prototypical and either matched or mismatched across the experimenter's prime scenes and participants' target elicitation scenes. Prime sentences were either double-object datives (DOD e.g., the girl brought the monkey a ball) or prepositional datives (PD e.g., the girl brought the ball to the monkey), and occurred with either animate-inanimate or inanimate-animate, post-verbal noun order. Participants' target sentences were coded for syntactic form, and animacy noun order. All age groups showed a structural priming effect. A significant interaction between prime structure, prime animacy-semantic role mappings and prime-target match indicated that animacy could moderate structural priming in 3 year olds. However, animacy had no effect on structural priming in any other instance. Nevertheless, production of DOD structures was influenced by whether animacy-semantic role mappings in primes and target scenes matched or mismatched. We provide new evidence of animacy noun order priming effects in 3 and 5 year olds where there was prime-target match in animacy-semantic role mappings. Neither prime animacy noun ordering nor animacy-semantic role mappings influenced adults' target sentences. Our results demonstrate that animacy cues can affect speakers' word order independently of syntactic structure and also through interactions with syntax, although these processes are subject to developmental changes. We therefore, suggest that theories of structural priming, sentence production, linguistic representation and language acquisition all need to explicitly account for developmental changes in the role of semantic and syntactic information in sentence processing.

Highlights

  • In order to communicate ideas, speakers must map concepts to syntactic structures

  • We examined whether structural priming is facilitated by interactions between animacy cues and syntactic structures

  • While structural priming appears fundamentally dependent on the repetition of syntactic frames and not the order of animacy-semantic role mappings, animacysyntax interactions moderated the magnitude of priming in young children

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Where one idea can be expressed using multiple structures, speakers have a tendency to use the most recently heard structure (Bock, 1986). Structural priming refers to the increased likelihood of using the DOD construction following a DOD, rather than PD prime sentence. In adults, Bock (1986) recorded 23% more PD, as opposed to DOD, targets following PD primes and 22% more DOD rather than PD targets after DOD primes. Adults display abstract priming effects where primes and targets have different verbs (Bock, 1986), nouns (Cleland and Pickering, 2003), function words (Bock, 1989) or conceptual ideas (Bock and Loebell, 1990)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call