Abstract

BPJS participants often experience discrimination by hospitals, hospital services for general patients and BPJS participants are very different. The purpose of this research is to analyze Position of Health Insurance Agreement and to analyze Liability of the Social Security Agency in the Case of Rejection of BPJS Participants by Hospitals in the Perspective of Civil Agreement Law. The method used in this study was normative method. Normative legal research in its development is research that uses the study of legal behavior concluded in legislation. BPJS neglect of its participants when there is a rejection by its partner hospitals is an act of default for BPJS participants. So it is clear that the neglect of BPJS towards its participants in the issue of rejection of BPJS participants by BPJS partner hospitals is clearly an action that violates the obligations, duties, and responsibilities of BPJS towards BPJS participants, this is not in accordance with what is promised in the health social security agreement made by BPJS with its participants.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call