Abstract
The temporary removal of a judge from the administration of justice is a relatively new measure to ensure criminal proceedings in criminal procedural law and is carried out by the High Council of Justice. At the same time, as evidenced by the practice of its implementation, there are certain issues that necessitate their study and discussion. Therefore, the procedure of temporary suspension of a judge from the administration of justice is characterized by features that are due to the special legal status of judges. It is the need to ensure the independence of judges that provides for a special procedure for their removal. At the same time, the temporary removal of a judge is a measure that involves the removal from justice of judges in respect of whom there are reasonable doubts about their suitability for office, high rank of judge, to confirm or deny the relevant information. This is necessary to maintain confidence in the judiciary as a whole. The purpose of the article is to study the procedural procedure for the application of temporary suspension of a judge from the administration of justice. The article examines the procedural procedure for the application of temporary suspension of a judge from the administration of justice. It is emphasized that the institution of temporary suspension of judges exists for the timely suspension of a judge. The peculiarities of the procedural order of application of temporary suspension of a judge from the administration of justice have been determined. It is concluded that based on the results of the consideration of the petition, the High Council of Justice may make the following decisions: on the temporary suspension of a judge from the administration of justice in connection with criminal prosecution or on the denial of such a petition. It was found that the suspension did not restrict access to the court premises, as well as to the materials of previously distributed cases. Therefore, if a judge is removed without a precautionary measure in the form of round-the-clock house arrest / detention, the court will continue to go to work. A judge may also continue to perform administrative functions as chairman of the court or judgespeaker. Continue lecturing at the School of Judges, or continue to take bribes.
Highlights
Тимчасове відсторонення судді від здійснення правосуддя є відносно новим заходом забезпечення кримінального провадження у кримінальному процесуальному законодавстві й здійснюється Вищою радою правосуддя
Без згоди Вищої ради правосуддя суддю не може бути затримано або утримувано під вартою чи арештом до винесення обвинувального вироку суду, за винятком затримання судді під час або відразу ж після вчинення тяжкого або особливо тяжкого злочину
Після спливу цього строку й у всіх інших випадках затримання, тримання судді під вартою чи арештом до винесення обвинувального вироку судом, повинно здійснюватись у встановленому КПК України порядку й за наявності згоди Вищої ради правосуддя
Summary
Тимчасове відсторонення судді від здійснення правосуддя є відносно новим заходом забезпечення кримінального провадження у кримінальному процесуальному законодавстві й здійснюється Вищою радою правосуддя. Вища рада правосуддя може ухвалити такі рішення: про тимчасове відсторонення судді від здійснення правосуддя у зв’язку з притягненням до кримінальної відповідальності або про відмову в задоволенні такого клопотання.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
