Abstract
This paper explores the impact on students’ learning of a change in assessment in a materials science course for engineers. The theory behind the move is discussed with reference to previous work on developing deeper approaches to learning in students at university. The new concept adopted was a ‘power test‘ — an open book format final exam, with extended time and opportunities for colleague interaction. Student response was evaluated by interviews and structured group discussions using a nominal group technique and outcomes were assessed by classification of student exam answers using the SOLO taxonomy of Biggs & Collis (1982). Results were compared with those of students taking the same course in the previous year but who were assessed by standard closed book exam. Problems associated with the introduction of such a novel course assessment to an otherwise traditional degree are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.