Abstract

Simple SummaryCompanion animals play an important role in the lives of New Zealanders. Animals’ guardians often engage professional behaviour and training support to ensure their companion animal’s behaviour is compatible with their lifestyle and expectations. The methods these professionals use vary substantially and potentially subject animals to psychological (and physical) harm where outdated, incorrect or aversive methods of training or equipment are used. The national regulation of training methods or techniques would safeguard the welfare of the animal benefactors of these services. In the absence of such regulation, the development of a national accreditation body may act to protect animal welfare by certifying the experience, qualifications and training methods of the professionals offering these services. We investigated industry opinion and readiness for the establishment of an accreditation body via an online survey and found that accreditation, promoting the use of reward-based training and behavioural modification techniques, was generally supported. We conclude that the establishment of a national accreditation body would ensure that those seeking services source professionals who use best practice when it comes to training and behavioural modification, resulting in lasting benefits to animal welfare. Companion animals are at risk of psychological (and physical) harm if outdated, incorrect or aversive methods of training or equipment are used during training and behavioural modification. Companion animal guardians often engage professional animal behaviour and training services, yet this industry is not regulated in New Zealand. A voluntary national accreditation and registration programme could act to protect the welfare of animals by robustly evaluating the experience, qualifications and training methods of industry professionals. To investigate industry readiness for a national accreditation programme, we conducted an online survey and analysed the responses of 262 animal trainers, behavioural consultants, dog safety educators, veterinarians and veterinary nurses. A national accreditation programme, promoting the use of reward-based training and behavioural modification techniques, was generally supported, especially by individuals holding qualifications and membership of professional organisations. The implementation of such a programme would ensure that those seeking these services are able to source professionals that use best practice when it comes to training and behavioural modification, with lasting benefits to animal welfare.

Highlights

  • Animals play an important role in the lives of New Zealanders, with 64.4% of households being home to at least one companion animal [1]

  • Methods that are considered aversive generally refer to the use of positive punishment and negative reinforcement, as opposed to reward-based training methods of positive reinforcement [7] and negative punishment [3,8]

  • In order to streamline the data analysis, and to measure the responses of those professionals that are possibly eligible for accreditation in the future, only responses from individuals currently offering a training or behavioural service were analysed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Animals play an important role in the lives of New Zealanders, with 64.4% of households being home to at least one companion animal [1]. A variety of species are kept as human companions and are expected to behave “well” to fit with societal norms [2], especially where they are invited to live inside the home. This results in a need to train some animal companions (primarily dogs) to perform human-perceived acceptable behaviours and dissuade undesirable behaviours [3], requiring the knowledge of training methods by their guardians. Various methods are used to train companion animals, some techniques and tools used can be argued as outdated and aversive [4,5]. Negative punishment is sometimes alternatively categorized as aversive [6], this is because for it to be effective, the experience (removal of something the animal wants) must be sufficiently unpleasant to motivate the change in behaviour

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.