Abstract

The relationship between science is one of the important issues that must be recognized by the researchers so as not to leave them and withdraw matters from science to other science without the benefit of scientific. Hence, the study dealt with one of the tenets of this relationship, the relationship between the science of speech and the doctrine of jurisprudence and the limits of the fundamentalist system model of one of the most prominent scholars of jurisprudence in the second half of the twentieth century, Mr. Abu al-Qasim al-Khoei. The research dealt with four words that were addressed in the science of assets: And the psychological and human actions and copies, which show from this system that in the sentence and in the detailed after the discursive research does not depend on the formation of rules in the science of jurisprudence, and therefore the researcher in the fundamentals of jurisprudence not to make them part of the system, In the science of speech has a link to some issues of jurisprudence.

Highlights

  • The relationship between science is one of the important issues that must be recognized by the researchers so as not to leave them and withdraw matters from science to other science without the benefit of scientific

  • The research dealt with four words that were addressed in the science of assets: And the psychological and human actions and copies, which show from this system that in the sentence and in the detailed after the discursive research does not depend on the formation of rules in the science of jurisprudence, and the researcher in the fundamentals of jurisprudence not to make them part of the system, In the science of speech has a link to some issues of jurisprudence

  • ‫الحكم ال رعي في حالة التعارض بين الأدلة ‪.‬‬ ‫ومن المباحث القديمة في عمم الأصول التي تك أهمية العلاقة بين العام والخاص نسي‬ ‫الكتاب بالسنة‪ ،‬إذ (كما يجوز تخصيص أحدهما بالآخر وبيان أحدهما بصاحبه‪ ،‬فكذلك يجوز نسي‬ ‫أحدهما بالآخر)(٘٘)‪ .‬وقد كان اصوليو اومامية القدما يعقدون لمبحث النسي فصلاً مستقلاً في‬ ‫دو ارتهم الأصولية لكون نتيجة النسي تسقط الدليل المنسوخ عن الحجية‪ ،‬وهو ما يدخل في صميم‬ ‫موضوع وغرض الأصولي ‪ .‬من غير أن يعني هذا أن تناول النسي يكون في فصمه الخاص به‪،‬‬ ‫بل نجد يذكر في فصل العام‪ ،‬في حالة تقدم العام وتأخر ورود الخاص بعد في حالة (كان ورود‬ ‫الخاص بعد حضور وقت العمل بالعام كان نسخاً له‪ ،‬وان كان قبمه بني عمى جواز تأخير بيان‬ ‫العام‪ ،‬فمن جوز جعمه تخصيصاً وبياناً له ‪ ....‬وغير المجوز بين قائل بانه يكون ناسخاً ‪ -‬وهو‬ ‫من لا ي ترط في جواز النسي حضور وقت العمل وبين ارد له‪ ،‬وهم المانعون من النسي قبل‬ ‫حضور الوقت)(‪ )٘ٙ‬ومن الواضح من هذا النص أن المسالة كانت محل أخذ ورد بين الاصوليين‬ ‫وليس مسألة مستحدثة أو استط اردية‪ ،‬وان الخلا مبنائي وحسب الموق من حيث الجواز وزمن‬ ‫ورود ‪ ،‬لذلك بعد أن عرض صاحب المعالم هذا الخلا ‪ ،‬بين انه(سيأتي تحقي ذلك)(‪ )٘ٚ‬والم ار‬

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The relationship between science is one of the important issues that must be recognized by the researchers so as not to leave them and withdraw matters from science to other science without the benefit of scientific.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call