Abstract

The process of painting interpretation handling and text writing resulted in insufficient attention to children's live speech; the teacher guided their activities, and individual interpretation of a painting is blocked by “barriers,” such as rigid teacher instructions, sample descriptive texts, and the like. The experimental technique was recognized based on establishing open educational communication between the teacher and pupils at the lesson, where primacy and value of the painting worked as a visual image. The research represented the comparative analysis of children's texts. The results were as follows: first,n comparison of text drafts and final versions describing the painting; second, third, analysis of pupils' worksheets for comparing two paintings; fourth,n analysis of individual memos. The research concluded that the “barrier” technique, where pupils should respond on already prepared text, resulted in less detailed statements with fewer figurative expressions, and also increased the similarity of the texts, that was “leveling up” of perception and vision of the painting by children. “Barrier-free” technique ran effectively because it helped children build educational and personal communication.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call