Abstract

Current essay analyzes the materialization of media discursive practices which give identity to the journalist as a subject. The discursive event of such production is investigated within the context of the voting held at the Brazilian Federal Court of Justice on the 17th June 2009 which ruled on the non-obligatory of a journalist university diploma to warrant the profession. Since it is an event beyond the casual range, it enhances the rise and transformation of knowledge in society and in new forms of power. Enunciation sequences in six articles published by the magazines Veja and IstoÉ and by the newspapers Folha de S. Paulo on-line and O Estado de São Paulo are analyzed. Foregrounded on the French Discourse Analysis (DA), especially on Michel Foucault’s theoretical presuppositions, the journalists’ identity is built on notions of the freedom of speech and of the press. Further, in the enunciations, the ‘ability myth’, as an innate and/or acquired factor received through experience in the exercise of the profession, also produces effects on identity.

Highlights

  • By eight votes against one the Brazilian FederalCourt of Justice decided on the 17th June 2009 that the journalist’s university diploma was not mandatory for the exercise of the profession

  • Gilmar Mendes and the court ministers Carmem Lúcia, Ricardo Lewandowski, Eros Grau, Carlos Ayres Britto, Cezar Peluso, Ellen Gracie and Celso de Mello voted against mandatory university diploma

  • Foregrounded on the theses by Foucault (2008a), the type of discourse analysis employed in this paper

Read more

Summary

By eight votes against one the Brazilian Federal

Court of Justice decided on the 17th June 2009 that the journalist’s university diploma was not mandatory for the exercise of the profession. It establishes a factor with regard to what is and is not allowed. It is a rare event since it is not usual that professions undergo such drastic modifications, extensive to all professionals. It is a rare occasion in which the Federal Court of Justice meets to decide whether a university degree is required for the exercise of a profession.

Discursive regulations
Final considerations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call