Abstract
In this article we intend to understand which discursive formations were historically and ideologically constituted about Dilma Rousseff 's impeachment process and how the meanings of corruption were interdiscursively mobilized in these formations. In theoretical-methodological terms we adopt the French discourse analysis, from the concepts of enunciation, discursive formation and interdiscourse. For that, we used as corpus of analysis statements collected on the social network Twitter. We show the discursive character and the construction of meanings of corruption from two discursive formations in dispute: #ForaDilma and # NaoVaiTerGolpe. In formations, the term corruption was an interdiscursive element that produced different meanings depending on ideological and historical affiliation. We conclude by showing the importance of considering discursive formations, discursive memory, ideological elements, and how to construct the meanings of corruption in recognizing its cultural, social, political and economic consequences.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
