Abstract

BackgroundA capacity for modulating the amplitude of the long-latency stretch reflex (LLSR) allows us to successfully interact with a physical world with a wide range of different mechanical properties. It has recently been demonstrated that stretch reflex modulation is impaired in both arms following monohemispheric stroke, suggesting that reflex regulation may involve structures on both sides of the motor system.MethodsWe examined the involvement of both primary motor cortices in healthy reflex regulation by eliciting stretch reflexes during periods of suppression of the motor cortices contra-and ipsilateral to the extensor carpi radialis in the nondominant arm.ResultsLLSRs were significantly attenuated during suppression of the contralateral, but not ipsilateral, motor cortex. Modulation of the LLSR was not affected by suppression of either primary motor cortex.ConclusionOur results confirm the involvement of the contralateral motor cortex in the transmission of the LLSR, but suggest that the ipsilateral motor cortex plays no role in reflex transmission and that neither motor cortex is involved in stability-dependent modulation of the LLSR. The implications of these results for reflex impairments following stroke are discussed.

Highlights

  • When operating in the physical world, our central nervous system must continually modify the stability of our body and limbs to compensate for instabilities in the environment

  • We examined the involvement of both primary motor cortices in healthy reflex regulation by eliciting stretch reflexes during periods of suppression of the motor cortices contra- and ipsilateral to the extensor carpi radialis in the nondominant arm

  • Our results confirm the involvement of the contralateral motor cortex in the transmission of the long-latency stretch reflex (LLSR), but suggest that the ipsilateral motor cortex plays no role in reflex transmission and that neither motor cortex is involved in stability-dependent modulation of the LLSR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When operating in the physical world, our central nervous system must continually modify the stability of our body and limbs to compensate for instabilities in the environment. Conclusion: Our results confirm the involvement of the contralateral motor cortex in the transmission of the LLSR, but suggest that the ipsilateral motor cortex plays no role in reflex transmission and that neither motor cortex is involved in stability-dependent modulation of the LLSR The implications of these results for reflex impairments following stroke are discussed

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call