Abstract

The Rwandan construction industry contributes up to 7.4% of the total GDP of 2010, yet its performance within the economy has been, and continues to be, very poor due to cost overruns resulting to abandonment of of projects. system procurement is still dominant in the Rwandan construction sector and this may likely continue to be the trend. Delay in project execution is a major problem in the Rwandan construction industry. This occurs both in small and large projects. Virtually, all the projects executed over the years in Rwanda were faced with problem of delay in delivery. The primary objective of the study is to analyze the influence of procurement systems on construction projects. Specific objectives are; to identify the extent to which various procurement systems commonly used by project managers in Kigali for construction projects, to examine when The traditional design-bid-build influence of procurement systems encountered employing various procurement systems for construction projects, to assess the merits and demerits of the various procurement systems on construction cost, develop a framework of procurement factors influencing delays. For the research design and methodology, the research will be carried out in Energy Development Corporation Limited as one of the institutions highly involved in the procurement and execution of construction works in Rwanda. The descriptive and explanatory approaches were done during the research and qualitative and quantitative methods were considered as well. About the sample size and target population, the researcher considers 21 as target population and census technique was used. Data analysis used spread sheets, SPSS and other statistic graphs and tables. The data The type of validity used by the researcher for this study was the content validity. For the reliability of the data collection instrument, Test- retest reliability was used. It is a measure of reliability obtained by administering the same test twice over a period of time to a group of individuals. The findings guided the researcher after analyzing data, to systems collection instruments were questionnaires. observe the influence of procurement on construction projects in Rwanda.

Highlights

  • Delay iin iproject iexecution iis ia imajor iproblem iin ithe iRwanda iconstruction iindustry i(Gitau, iL. iM. i2015, iMushuti, iA. iet ial. i2016). iThis ioccurs iin iboth ismall iand ilarge iprojects. iVirtually, iall ithe iprojects iexecuted iover ithe iyears iin iRwanda iwere ifaced iwith ithe iproblem iof idelay iin idelivery. iMusirikare iand iKule i(2016) iobserved ithat i65.7% iof ipublic iconstruction iprojects iwhich iwere iimplemented ibetween i2009-2012 iwere idelayed, iwhereas ionly i5.2% iof ithese iprojects ifaced icost ioverruns

  • Various iprocurement isystems used for construction projects iwere idetermined. i

  • This iresearch ithus ihas iestablished ithe ineed ifor iappropriate isuggestions iand irecommendations ion ithe iadequate ichoice iof ithe iprocurement isystem ito iuse ifor ia iconstruction iproject ifor ian ioptimum iperformance

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The iconstruction iindustry iis ian iimportant ipart iof ithe ieconomical ibackbone iin imany icountries i(Agarwal, iet ial, i2019) ioften iaccounting ifor ibetween i7-10 ipercent iof ithe iGross iDomestic iProduct iIn iRwanda, ithis iindustry iis iof iparamount iimportance ifor iemployment iand ieconomic igrowth i(MINICOM, i2011, iRDB, i2012). iThe iGDP iin ithe iconstruction iindustry igrew ifrom iRWF ibillion i105 iin i2006 ito iRWF ibillion i244 iin i2010. iThe isector icontributed i6.1%, i6.5%, i7.5%, i7.3% iand i7.4% iof ithe itotal iGDP iin i2006, i2007, i2008, i2009 iand i2010 irespectively i(NISR/BNR, i2010). i iIts iperformance iwithin ithe ieconomy ihas ibeen iand icontinue ito ibe igood. iConstruction iis iamong iindustries iwhich iuse ihigh inumber iof ilabor iin iRwanda iand iviews ion iprevailing ibusiness iconditions iand iin ithe inext idecades iare ibetter ifor iconstruction iindustry ithan iother iindustries i(MINICOM, i2011). iThe iRwandan iconstruction iindustry icontinues ito ioccupy ian iimportant iposition iin ithe ination’s ieconomy ieven ithough iit icontributes iless ithan ithe imanufacturing. iThis iindustry iplays ian iimportant irole iin ithe ieconomy, iand ithe iproducts iof iits iactivities iare iso ivital ito ithe iachievement iof ia inational isocio-economic idevelopment igoals iof icreating ijob iopportunities iand isocial iamenities iand iinfrastructures i(MINICOM, i2011).There is insufficient information about the use of ivarious itypes iof iprocurement imethods iin iRwanda. iFor example there are questions wether the use iof procurement can isignificantly iaffect ithe iperformance iof imost iprojects. IThe iRwandan iconstruction iindustry icontinues ito ioccupy ian iimportant iposition iin ithe ination’s ieconomy ieven ithough iit icontributes iless ithan ithe imanufacturing. IFor example there are questions wether the use iof procurement can isignificantly iaffect ithe iperformance iof imost iprojects. The iRwanda iconstruction iindustry iis imodeled iafter ithe iFrench iand iBelgium isystems, iBelgium ibeing iour icolonial imaster, ialthough, iin ithe ipost-tutsi igenocide iof i1994, iit ihas iincorporated ithe istyles iof iUnited iKingdom iand iEast iAfrican icountries. I. The itraditional isystem iof iprocurement iis istill idominant iin iRwanda iconstruction isector iand i ithis imay ilikely icontinue ito ibe ithe itrend. IIn iaddition, ithe iRwandan iconstruction isector icomprises ithe iclients, icontractors, isubcontractors, isuppliers, iand ikey iprofessional iactors iresponsible ifor idesign iand isupervision iof iprojects i(Aimable, iSIBOMANA iet ial. Delay iin iproject iexecution iis ia imajor iproblem iin ithe iRwanda iconstruction iindustry i(Gitau, iL. iM. i2015, iMushuti, iA. iet ial. i2016). iThis ioccurs iin iboth ismall iand ilarge iprojects. iVirtually, iall ithe iprojects iexecuted iover ithe iyears iin iRwanda iwere ifaced iwith ithe iproblem iof idelay iin idelivery. iMusirikare iand iKule i(2016) iobserved ithat i65.7% iof ipublic iconstruction iprojects iwhich iwere iimplemented ibetween i2009-2012 iwere idelayed, iwhereas ionly i5.2% iof ithese iprojects ifaced icost ioverruns

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call