Abstract

The subject of this publication is the classification and systematization of factors that influence the modification of the auditor’s opinion in the official report on the accuracy of the financial statements of client companies. A cluster of influencing factors was substantiated and proposed, based on the possible presence of material misstatements, events of significant uncertainty, and full disclosures in the notes to the financial statements. On the basis of a comparative analysis of statistical data on the results of mandatory and initiative audit, the main trends in the ratio of various types of auditors' opinions and the degree of their modification, formed in the main segment of the audit services market in Ukraine, are identified. The logical chain of transforming the auditor’s professional judgment into a final opinion in a general format, as well as taking into account the effect of significant uncertainty events, is substantiated and presented. As a tool for the practical implementation of the requirements of the International Auditing Standards, Matrices of dependence of the influential groups of factors and the degree of modification of the auditor's opinion under specific circumstances and results of the assignment are proposed. The purpose of the study was to identify and systematize the factors that influence the modification of the final opinion on the reliability of the financial statements of client enterprises in the official report of the auditor; in the development of tools for the practical implementation of the requirements of international professional standards to justify the degree of modification of opinion, providing sufficient confidence to interested users, minimizing their information risks. Sources and research methods: the information base of the research was the International Standards for Quality Control, Audit, Review, Other Provision of Confidence and Related Services (2016-2017) of the Council on International Standards on Auditing and Providing Confidence of the International Federation of Accountants; official statistics on the market of audit services in Ukraine (201 4 –2017); scientific publications; personal observations of the author. The study used methods of analysis and synthesis; systematic approach and systematization; dialectical, logical, economic and statistical methods. Results and practical significance: the obtained results allow us to conclude that in order to ensure the proper quality of performance of tasks for auditing the financial statements, auditing entities must, with due care and professional skepticism, approach the substantiation of their opinion, especially if it is modified. The proposed logical chain of formation of professional judgment and independent opinion of the auditor focuses on the general and specific factors influencing the choice of its type. The pragmatic value of the research is the algorithm for determining the effect of compliance with the assumption of the continuity of client enterprises on the choice of the type of auditor’s opinion with regard to its possible modification. Matrices of influence of influential groups of factors and the degree of modification of the auditor’s opinion ( а opinion with caution, а negative opinion, а refusal to express an opinion) are tools for effective navigation in order to implement the requirements of the International Standards on Auditing.

Highlights

  • The problem of forming the structure and content of the official report of an independent auditor in an adequate format for interested users constantly accompanies the theory and practice of auditing throughout the history of the establishment and development of the audit institution

  • The purpose of the study was to identify and systematize the factors that influence the modification of the final opinion on the reliability of the financial statements of client enterprises in the official report of the auditor; in the development of tools for the practical implementation of the requirements of international professional standards to justify the degree of modification of opinion, providing sufficient confidence to interested users, minimizing their information risks

  • The results of the study showed that, in order to ensure the proper quality of the audit tasks of the financial statements, the subjects of audit activity are obliged, with due diligence and professional skepticism, to approach the substantiation of their opinion, especially in the event of its modification

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The problem of forming the structure and content of the official report of an independent auditor in an adequate format for interested users constantly accompanies the theory and practice of auditing throughout the history of the establishment and development of the audit institution This is typical both for the international auditing public and for the professional auditing public in Ukraine. The desire to strengthen public confidence in the profession of an auditor and to ensure public recognition of its need draws the Council on International Standards on Auditing and Providing Confidence of the International Federation of Accountants to constantly review and strengthen the requirements of international professional standards for the quality of the report of an independent auditor [13] This concerns the standardization of an integrated approach to the consideration of all factors influencing the justification of the auditor’s opinion in the final report, taking into account its possible modification. The main focus is on expressing opinions about the reliability of the financial statements of client companies, but more about the ability of companies to ensure the continuity of their activities in the foreseeable future

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.