Abstract

How to reduce the negative transport externalities, especially its carbon emissions, without having significant negative influence on economic and social development is the key for sustainable development in China. This paper explores the impacts of China’s recent modal shift policy on carbon emissions, summaries experience from China, and points out future development directions. The paper first compares the different energy consumption and carbon emissions between the road freight transport and the railways in China, and then has a scenarios analysis on China’s energy consumption and carbon emissions of the transport sector in 2025. The latest progress and major problems of modal shift policy in China are presented, and a methodology to address this problem is also proposed. Based on the methodology, we compare the benefits and costs brought by modal shift policy in the case of Ordos, Inner Mongolia. Based on the results, principles and suggestions on how to design and implement more efficient modal shift policy are proposed. We find that road transport is the most polluting mode among various modes of transport, and the railway transport has the least carbon emissions. Furthermore, the modal shift policy plays a positive role in carbon emissions, but the costs caused by the policy are higher than the benefits at some circumstances. Moreover, to achieve the sustainable modal shift policy by relying on the feasible market mechanism, together with scientific and effective regulation, instead of “one size for all” administrative policy, are likely the way forward.

Highlights

  • The Chinese government and people have realized that economic and social development need focus on GDP growth and on the sustainability of environment, which has been faced with severe environmental pollution and ecological destruction for more than twenty years

  • The carbon emissions from the transport sector account for about 20% of the total emissions in China’s is more than 80%, while the percentage of the United States, Japan, and India is above 85%, in Japan and the European Union, and it even reaches about 35% in the United States

  • Theanalysis, market tools article findsmodal that road transport is the most and most polluting among to achieve shift are to be considered, andenergy simplyconsuming relying on administrative means mode will inevitably various modes of transport, and the railway transport hasenvironmental the lowest energy consumption and lead to economic inefficiency

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Chinese government and people have realized that economic and social development need focus on GDP growth and on the sustainability of environment, which has been faced with severe environmental pollution and ecological destruction for more than twenty years. China’s total carbon emissions from fuel combustion in 2015 were 9.084 billion tons, of which 843.9 million tons came from the transport sector, accounting for. China’s total carbon emissions from fuel combustion in 2015 were 9.084 transport sector will become the main source of carbon emissions in China in the future with the billion tons, of which 843.9 million tons came from the transport sector, accounting for 9.3% of the total. The carbon emissions from the transport sector account for about 20% of the total emissions in China’s is more than 80%, while the percentage of the United States, Japan, and India is above 85%, in Japan and the European Union, and it even reaches about 35% in the United States

Literature Review
Comparative Analysis and the Traffic Forecast of Rail and Road
Scenario Analysis on the Numerical Results of “Road to Rail”
Assumptions and Scenarios Setting
Energy Consumption and Carbon Emissions under Different Scenarios
Chinese Government’s Modal Shift Policy So Far
The Latest Radical Government Policy on the Modal Shift
17 September 2018
The Negative Impacts of the “One Size for All” Administrative Policy
A Contrastive Analysis of the Railway Experience between US and China
The left vertical
Methodology
Dongwu railway is from
The Effects of “Road to Rail” Policy: A Case in Ordos Region
Findings
Conclusions and Recommendations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call