Abstract

Jonathan H. Turner is the Distinguished Professor of Sociology at the University of California at Riverside and, for many decades, the world’s leading authority on sociological theory, with research interests in many other areas such as human and societal evolution, social stratification and inequality, philosophy of science, and historical sociology. Professor Turner has authored, co-authored, edited, or co-edited a number of works, including more than 43 influential books, which have been published in twelve different languages, including The Structure of Sociological Theory, The Emergence of Sociological Theory, and many others. He is a member of the American Sociological Association and a former president of the Pacific Sociological Society and the journal editor for Sociological Theory. Professor Turner received a B.A. with honors from University of California at Santa Barbara, a M.A. and a doctorate in sociology from Cornell University. The interview is Professor Turner’s critical reply to the arguments raised in the article “Against Grand Theories: A (Cautionary) Tale of Two Disciplines,” which presents the view that universally accepted grand theories in social sciences are not achievable because of the lack of a common methodology or a theoretical core which results in their multiparadigmatic nature, value-leadenness and insufficient objectivity. The interview took place on March 23, 2021 online.

Highlights

  • That’s why something like The Principles of Sociology is so long – it’s full of data

  • Petr Jedlička: Your diagnosis of the state of sociological theory is that it is a hyperdifferentiated, overspecialized, and fragmented discipline1 – which is similar to the one that appears in my article

  • I inferred from this that it is a permanent characteristic of sociology given its limitations as a social science

Read more

Summary

Introduction

That’s why something like The Principles of Sociology is so long – it’s full of data. That’s why I think it’s possible to do grand theory. It’s a real theory, it’s not a category system, it’s not ideology, it’s series of principles that are very abstract that I assert are good for all times, in all places, whenever humans, or, I suspect, all intelligent life forms organized.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call