The Framework of Law Impacts in Philosophy of Law and Justice: How the Certainty and Justice Understood?

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:0in">This paper put an analysis on the
 autonomy principle among law practitioners. The principle and values usually
 use as the basic concept for justice understanding. The justice concept is adopted
 to enforce the law in the fair trial process should not just understand to be
 the main goal. There must be a wide broad approach segmented the social and
 cultural frameworks with the conceptual analysis. This article is also concerned
 for searching the reason relating to the paradigmatic practical calculations to
 constitute the rule known as the reasonable rationale. The essential conditions
 of what is practically  managing the
 guide with the rule application remarks just revealed. These remarks hopefully
 can bring a clear explanation relating to the law practitioners pragmatic view
 of speech act implications for debating the provisions. The standard case of
 rules is formulated to protect and to fulfill the people's rights rather
 rigidly fixing its range of application. There are powers of the people is
 nevertheless limited decisions of legal validity concerning the substance of
 the law. Dissatisfaction with the understanding of law practitioners for making
 the reliable concept relating to the relationship between the law and powers of
 people is underpinned by the ideal of popular sovereignty influence to be
 understood. It is similar to the argument that consisted of the legal system for
 the rule of law to be existed. There is a necessity to confirm and build some
 mechanism of certain social practices among public officials and law
 practitioners. There must be clear perspectives on how and why the government
 and their policies absolutely cannot avoid the political biased and the
 certainty of law urge to build the certain facts of law for the people to be
 able to make law at all.<o:p></o:p></p>