Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing (‘fracking’), like other complex social and environmental issues, is a controversy about science which raises educational questions about how best to prepare young people to understand, respond to and, where necessary, act (or not) in response. It raises political questions. We present a state-of-the-art review of research literature on fracking and education using systematic strategies, with a view to finding out how it is framed in educational situations and how politics enters the science classroom. This serves as an illustrative case of how contested scientific and technological interventions with implications for the environment and society are treated in school science. The review is supplemented by interviews with 10 teachers of science and engineering working in schools or colleges near sites of operational exploratory fracking. We find that the research literature on teaching hydraulic fracturing is sparse, with only 25 studies relating to teaching and learning about fracking. Few studies (n = 7) relate to high school education. Where it features in science education, fracking is used as a context for interdisciplinarity and critical thinking, and lends itself to approaches using discussion, dialogue and modelling. Outcomes from fracking education range include knowledge gains and critical thinking. Teachers interviewed tended not to see a place for fracking in the curriculum or in the classroom and were averse to including politics in upper high school science education. Our analysis suggests depoliticization through absence of this specific complex environmental issue from the public (education) sphere, reinforced by the desire for ‘balance’ in high school science education and instrumental approaches to science education which prioritize assessed learning outcomes. Dealing with complex social and environmental issues such as hydraulic fracturing in the years of compulsory science schooling is necessary because scientific knowledge is necessary but not sufficient to prepare young people for the critical scientific literacy required to meet sustainable development goals. There is a need to assess and respond to the educational needs of local communities affected by industrial interventions such as fracking. These findings are likely to be relatable to other issues where there are local and global consequences of action or inaction and where the environment and health are pitted against economic and energy demands.

Highlights

  • In 2015, UN member states signed up to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (United Nations 2015), the core of which is 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) including quality education (SDG 4), affordable and clean energy (SDG 7), clean water (SDG 6), decent work and economic growth (SDG 8) and climate action (SDG 13)

  • Fracking is an example of a context in which scientific and technological knowledge comes into contact and conflict with economic, political, social and other forms of knowledge, and which requires critical scientific literacy in order to make well-justified decisions about the desirability of actions relating to fracking or anti-fracking

  • Raveendran argues for greater attention to political literacy in science classrooms and for attention to the power relations that exist in society and to the role of science and technology in reinforcing inequalities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2015, UN member states signed up to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (United Nations 2015), the core of which is 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) including quality education (SDG 4), affordable and clean energy (SDG 7), clean water (SDG 6), decent work and economic growth (SDG 8) and climate action (SDG 13). These include focusing on the nature of the controversy, critical reflection on one’s own views, promoting open-mindedness and curiosity to know more in order to inform decisions and motivating teachers to share their own positions, and the means by which they arrived at these, with students. Understanding how fracking is taught as a specific case can contribute to understanding of broader issues related to how other controversial scientific and technological issues are dealt with in science classrooms and identify the contribution of science education to meeting the SDGs. In this study, we discuss the place of education about fracking in high school science and the inclusion of the political dimensions of science in high schools, before presenting the findings of the state-of-the-art review of fracking in education and interviews with teachers and discussing the implications beyond the context of fracking

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call